iniuit basketball pro 420
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 22 Mar 2023
It's absolutely embarrassing that a bunch of so-called lawyers and legal experts are hinging this absolute circus show of a "defense" on entirely extralegal matters. Let's say the oldest kid (16, mind you) has a job, can drive, etc. None of that matters, because *by the letter of the law* parents have certain legal responsibilities to any children under their care that are under the age of 18. What they're saying is, children ranging from the ages of 6-16 are fully fit and capable of taking care of themselves and/or each other. Actually, that's not embarassing. That's fucking infuriating.People who try to place responsibilities on kids are retarded. The 16 year old most likely only recently turned 16, if he gets a job who's watching the other 4? His parents got strung out before he could learn how to drive, get a job or take care of 4 other kids when he's a KID himself.
No guarantees that they can or will, but I would put actual money on them trying their absolute hardest to do soDoes it really matter who the judge is? There's only three. Are the noseguards going to find a problem with all three?