Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Useful_Mistake]

Russ's response is going to be completely unhinged.

If he responds at all

 

[AnOminous]

Look again

Wyświetl załącznik 5847711

Weird. Still not seeing it although the docket now has a parenthetical saying response requested.

 

[Betonhaus]

Look again

Wyświetl załącznik 5847711

Is there like a dropdown menu or a tab to click on order to find that line?

 

[ScooterL]

I enjoyed the first footnote. Relevant because it undermines Russell's claim that he's not an experienced litigator, while concisely introducing the court to his real character - a devious little worm who wants to pay for sex with teenagers.

Stylish work, Mr Hardin.

 

[Botchy Galoop]

Please forgive. I am trying to get this entire lawsuit clear in my mind. This is my basic understanding:

• Greer sues Moon and Kiwi Farms in Nevada court
• Case is dismissed, thus Moon "wins"
• Greer appeals the dismissal
• Appeal is granted, thus Greer "wins" plus appellate court makes some dubious rulings
• Ball in Greers court, Greer drops the ball, misses scheduling and other deadlines
• Moon's atty asks Nevada court "where is the plaintiff?" and says "this should be in Florida court"
• Nevada court, happy to dump this dog, agrees that the venue should be Florida

TY in advance for corrections and clarifications.

• So now, is Florida just deciding the appeal or is the whole shit-a-ree back to the very beginning?

 

[DavidS877]

Please forgive. I am trying to get this entire lawsuit clear in my mind. This is my basic understanding:

• Greer sues Moon and Kiwi Farms in Nevada court
• Case is dismissed, thus Moon "wins"
• Greer appeals the dismissal
• Appeal is granted, thus Greer "wins" plus appellate court makes some dubious rulings
• Ball in Greers court, Greer drops the ball, misses scheduling and other deadlines
• Moon's atty asks Nevada court "where is the plaintiff?" and says "this should be in Florida court"
• Nevada court, happy to dump this dog, agrees that the venue should be Florida

TY in advance for corrections and clarifications.

• So now, is Florida just deciding the appeal or is the whole shit-a-ree back to the very beginning?

Greer sues Moon and Kiwi Farms in Nevada court -> Utah Court. Greer Lived there at the time.

It continues right where Utah left off. The appeal kicked it back to Utah and said basically "this claim needs to go to trial". They now need a trial or to dismiss it on different grounds. Since the original pre-appeal was dismissed at the beginning they need to go through all the motions/discovery/and ultimately trial.

 

[Betonhaus]

So now, is Florida just deciding the appeal or is the whole shit-a-ree back to the very beginning?

I think we might first get a response that boils down to "wtf?"

 

[Harvey Danger]

Ouch! The plights and trauma lumps! I love Hardin for putting exactly who and what Greer is, in front of the Judge with his first motion. And clearly and succintly laid out why he is pulling no punches with the pro se retard. Along with rather cleverly pointing out that the 10th dumped this all in her lap rather than deal with it.

This really is well-written. I was worried we were in for another month of the court trying to figure out WTF just landed in their lap, but this makes is crystal clear without sounding like repetitious complaining. It also clears up the end-of-docket confusion from Utah, very concisely.

Null got one of the good ones.

If he responds at all

Hardin impugned the integrity of the sacred address. Greer will absolutely ride to its defense astride a frothing motion (once he figures out how to file in Florida).

 

[ScooterL]

they need to go through all the motions/discovery/and ultimately trial

All of which Russell is incapable of doing, so the whole thing falls apart, unless he can do enough double-shifts mopping floors to pay for some very expensive lawyers.

I really think he might just ghost the court - and if he doesn't, we're going to have a lot of milk.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Weird. Still not seeing it although the docket now has a parenthetical saying response requested.

Is there like a dropdown menu or a tab to click on order to find that line?

I realise this is a very serious thread with very serious discussion... I guess I shouldn't have clipped quite so much of the top line.

 

[Betonhaus]

I realise this is a very serious thread with very serious discussion... I guess I shouldn't have clipped quite so much of the top line.

I have no idea what you are even looking at

 

[RodgerDodger]

If he responds at all

Hardin mailed it to his actual den! Russ is not going to take that quietly.

 

[ScooterL]

I have no idea what you are even looking at
Wyświetl załącznik 5848496

It's a gag, and he gave it away too soon.

 

[Mind Goblins]

I realise this is a very serious thread with very serious discussion... I guess I shouldn't have clipped quite so much of the top line.

It's okay friend, I've got you

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

I have no idea what you are even looking at
Wyświetl załącznik 5848496

So this circus has to wait on the slack-jawed faggot again? Can the "I'm a retard" excuse help him at this point?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Magistrate is notified that he has to resolve pending motions. Due to the fact that this was not assigned a docket number, we all missed it for 4 days

 

[StinkySnack]

So this circus has to wait on the slack-jawed faggot again? Can the "I'm a retard" excuse help him at this point?

No. Russell is not required to file a reply. If you'd put in the minimal effort to read the thread, you'd already know that as it was addressed several pages back.

A lot of you non-Greer thread regulars are a lot like Russell yourselves.

 

[RodgerDodger]

I really think he might just ghost the court - and if he doesn't, we're going to have a lot of milk.

The real question now is just how far his previous ghosting of the court will go? He may already be past the point of no return. As Hardin pointed out Russ's only response to filings or court prders in Utah was to vehemently, possibly maliciously affirm that the incorrect address given to the court was in fact correct.

Courts don't like it when the Plaintiff plays hard to get. It indicates that they are wasting the Courts time and resources.

Failure to Prosecute the claims is a clean problem free and pretty much unappealable way to dispose of the entire mess. Just as the Utah Court realized that kicking it to Florida was the most problem free least appealable mechanism of dealing with it.

 

[BULLY HUNTER_78]

I enjoyed the first footnote. Relevant because it undermines Russell's claim that he's not an experienced litigator, while concisely introducing the court to his real character - a devious little worm who wants to pay for sex with teenagers.

Stylish work, Mr Hardin.

My favorite is the second footnote that references Greer’s ability to use the correct address for his PAC. The Judge should very easily conclude Russ is playing games with the court to delay the case while he raises funds to retain the DJF.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

No. Russell is not required to file a reply. If you'd put in the minimal effort to read the thread, you'd already know that as it was addressed several pages back.

A lot of you non-Greer thread regulars are a lot like Russell yourselves.

Thanks fucktard. I was seeking clarification on the Supreme Court's response to Russell's antics, but yes, I probably skimmed over it. Good job pointing that out faggot.