Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Useful_Mistake]

It may be to simply help forestall an avenue of appeal. Because which would be the "Proper Appeals Court"for the transfer? 10th or 11th?

The Florida case I cited earlier would suggest that 10th would be the proper Appeals Court.

Is it possible Hardin is poking fun at Russ in his own way?

I mean, he clearly is.

 

[Your Starter for 10]

Now who is going to report Hardin to the Bar for wasting his clients money by filing extraneous responses to frivolous motions that he knows will have no chance of being read (on the record) by any court official.

 

[The Great Citracett]

Now who is going to report Hardin to the Bar for wasting his clients money by filing extraneous responses to frivolous motions that he knows will have no chance of being read (on the record) by any court official.

One of Russell's current missions is trying to get a local pastor/lawyer disbarred for not supporting brothels and for speaking against human trafficking, so I wouldn't put it past him to to start harassing the Bar about Hardin as well for an equally stupid reason.

 

[FuckedOffToff]

Hardin really enjoyed writing that "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" footnote, didn't he?
Must be hard to generate chuckles from general everyday lawyer stuff, I bet this passes for fun in legal land.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

For some inexplicable reason, Mr. Hardin decided to respond to Russ' whining motion to Utah court.

Now that Russell's shit on the carpet, might as well rub his nose in it.

Hardin really enjoyed writing that "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" footnote, didn't he?
Must be hard to generate chuckles from general everyday lawyer stuff, I bet this passes for fun in legal land.

This is exactly it. For various professional and practical reasons, Hardin can't come shitpost with us, and even though he can call or email Null to laugh about something, he wants to have his fun, too.

Hell, there are lawyers in this thread that would probably enjoy writing up responses to some of this batshit insane stuff themselves, and Hardin actually gets to do so. Let him have his fun.

 

[StinkySnack]

One of Russell's current missions is trying to get a local pastor/lawyer disbarred for not supporting brothels and for speaking against human trafficking, so I wouldn't put it past him to to start harassing the Bar about Hardin as well for an equally stupid reason.

Russell has complained to the Bar about nearly every lawyer he's interacted with. Skordas, Guinasso, judges who've ruled against him, attorneys who wouldn't hire him, etc. Of course he's complained about Hardin. Probably multiple times since he joined the case.

"Hardin said mean things about me!"
"Hardin made too many filings at once in an attempt to BURY me!"
"Hardin posted a mean drawing of me!"
"Hardin raised money off the mean drawing of me and I didn't get any of it!!"
"Hardin called me delusional when I'm clearly sane!"
"DISBAR HIM NOW!"

 

[RodgerDodger]

One of Russell's current missions is trying to get a local pastor/lawyer disbarred for not supporting brothels and for speaking against human trafficking, so I wouldn't put it past him to to start harassing the Bar about Hardin as well for an equally stupid reason.

The Bar ethics complaint boards tend to have an extra special file for "complaints filed by idiotic opposing litigants and pro se morons". I've heard they break it out and read choice specimens at holiday gatherings for the entertainment of all.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

For some inexplicable reason, Mr. Hardin decided to respond to Russ' whining motion to Utah court.
Wyświetl załącznik 5839500
He even acknowledges that the court literally cannot rule on Greer's motion. Perplexing
Wyświetl załącznik 5839502

Because Russell filed something and the court hasn't issued (won't issue, we can hope) anything saying shut up, Russell, case is closed, and bc Russell lost on the motion to transfer specifically because he did not respond. So to avoid any possibility of the court possibly applying the same "you slept on it" rationale against Josh, he filed. Shouldn't need to be done, but given the court's indulgence of the poor pro se plaintiff, and to tie up any loose ends, I see why he did it. Real world.

That and legal shitposting that probably won't get him in trouble, but more just belt and suspenders.

Now who is going to report Hardin to the Bar for wasting his clients money by filing extraneous responses to frivolous motions that he knows will have no chance of being read (on the record) by any court official.

Defensible given the plaintiff's pattern of behavior and irrelevant if the client okayed it.

 

[BoomerPrime]

On top of thoroughly enjoying this ass-faced retard getting his shit pushed in, I just wanted to say thanks to @AnOminous, @Useful_Mistake, and @mindlessobserver especially for the very interesting legal takes/options/observations about where things could go. Really helpful (and entertaining) for an old fuck like me that has somehow managed to not be involved in much of the legal process over the years.

"No, pro se child, it is you who will be traveling. Enjoy Florida, drooler."

 

[Sneedfully and Peacefully]

When Greer receives these filings and has his usual mental breakdown, do you think he's capable of screaming somewhat like a normal person?

What I mean is do his neighbors hear "AAAAAAAAA" and strained shitlip swearing, or is it more like "ghhhhhhh! fhhfuck yoo hhrhdimn"

 

[Useful_Mistake]

When Greer receives these filings and has his usual mental breakdown, do you think he's capable of screaming somewhat like a normal person?

You don’t really need to open your mouth wide to scream. It’s a bit uncomfortable, but possible

I just wanted to say thanks to @AnOminous, @Useful_Mistake, and @mindlessobserver especially for the very interesting legal takes/options/observations about where things could go.

Glad you enjoyed it!

 

[The Great Citracett]

When Greer receives these filings and has his usual mental breakdown, do you think he's capable of screaming somewhat like a normal person?

What I mean is do his neighbors hear "AAAAAAAAA" and strained shitlip swearing, or is it more like "ghhhhhhh! fhhfuck yoo hhrhdimn"

Probably something like Chewbacca trying to gargle.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

For some inexplicable reason, Mr. Hardin decided to respond to Russ' whining motion to Utah court.
Wyświetl załącznik 5839500
He even acknowledges that the court literally cannot rule on Greer's motion. Perplexing
Wyświetl załącznik 5839502

Of course Hardin didn't have to reply, but he did have to explain

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Now who is going to report Hardin to the Bar for wasting his clients money by filing extraneous responses to frivolous motions that he knows will have no chance of being read (on the record) by any court official.

It's not really frivolous if there's a good faith basis for the filing, which could just be that Greer is so retarded and has been given so much leeway as a pro se litigant that Hardin is countering what could be liberally construed as an argument making a case for a change in law (albeit, settled law with a sub-1% chance of being changed). The charging money part wouldn't be the basis for an ethics complaint, though I guess it could be a basis for injury in a negligent malpractice claim from breach of an attorney's duty to be competent. Even then, attorney-judgment rule would shield Hardin from being liable for a lot of tactical decisions.

 

[Kosher Salt]

It just requires a good faith effort to engage, not that you spend needless hours in an exercise in futility. Anyway nool's covered. This slurping retard will not drain the war chest unless he somehow wins and gets max statutory damages on both claims.

Realistically, this probably just looks like an email from party A to party B saying "I intend to make a motion for X for reasons XYZ," and party B replying either "we will not oppose X" or "we oppose X for reasons XYZ", right? And then party A says in their motion that they conferred with the other party by email and their motion is/isn't being opposed (or they got no response within 24 hours).

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Realistically, this probably just looks like an email from party A to party B saying "I intend to make a motion for X for reasons XYZ," and party B replying either "we will not oppose X" or "we oppose X for reasons XYZ", right? And then party A says in their motion that they conferred with the other party by email and their motion is/isn't being opposed (or they got no response within 24 hours).

It's saying to do all the TCP handshake shit offline before submitting crap to the court. Don't do the bullshit stuff that is always tried and never works.

Basic bitch example, don't ask for a stay because you're having a baby, let the other party know and if they agree just let both inform the court kinda thing.

 

[waffle]

It's saying to do all the TCP handshake shit offline before submitting crap to the court. Don't do the bullshit stuff that is always tried and never works.

Basic bitch example, don't ask for a stay because you're having a baby, let the other party know and if they agree just let both inform the court kinda thing.

I'm convinced being a federal judge is the ultimate negative example of hazing. By the time you become one you've been so mentally fucked up by decades of shitty notes and orders about "woah bro, you expect me to do my job and rule on motions? Im an important and busy man" that there's no way you're just going to accept that it can actually be a better use of you['re clerk]'s time to just adobe stamp your signature on shit like that instead of making everyone exchange a bunch of emails to generate a document that you['re clerk] is still going to just adobe stamp that signature on.

 

[Moths]

It's saying to do all the TCP handshake shit offline before submitting crap to the court. Don't do the bullshit stuff that is always tried and never works.

Basic bitch example, don't ask for a stay because you're having a baby, let the other party know and if they agree just let both inform the court kinda thing.

So in other words they don't believe in the Ty Beard method of law of just shooting your entire load at the last minute while giving opposition no time to respond?

 

[BIG BILL HELL'S]

Looks like Law Santa is going to be talking about the case.

 

[BoomerPrime]

It's saying to do all the TCP handshake shit offline before submitting crap to the court. Don't do the bullshit stuff that is always tried and never works.

Finally, someone puts it into terms I can understand!!!