💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
You'd never see the cheap bottles though. He'd just refill his expensive bottle with Jim Beam and we'd be none the wiser. He may already be doing so.
No, that would require realizing he has no money left. Nick doesn't like looking at finances. It's icky, prudish even. Better to just let the nanny handle the receipts.
 
He is headed into freefall with his income, and I am waiting until it actually hits and affects the daily life image he portrays. It had taken longer because of the contract and will take longer because his home is paid for, but taxes are high...
We haven't seen any new Rustangs, CoomMobiles, trips to Cuck Island, or similar crap recently.
 
No, that would require realizing he has no money left. Nick doesn't like looking at finances. It's icky, prudish even. Better to just let the nanny handle the receipts.
"You spent $3,000 on snacks?!? Well... I mean... I DO like Doritos. Plus it does make me look stupid rich to everybody. Okay, fine."
 
"You spent $3,000 on snacks?!? Well... I mean... I DO like Doritos. Plus it does make me look stupid rich. Okay, fine."
If Doritos are the bar to being rich... fuck, guess my megear wage is actually part of the 1%, because I can buy a bag of cool ranch Doritos ( the best kind). BRB, gotta make a Walmart run guys!
 
If Doritos are the bar to being rich... fuck, guess my megear wage is actually part of the 1%, because I can buy a bag of cool ranch Doritos ( the best kind). BRB, gotta make a Walmart run guys!
No, you got to spend $3,000 on Doritos and other snacks, or it doesn't count. It's the size of the bill that makes him cool.

Nick really thinks sharing how much the Nanny buys in snacks each month makes him cool, and doesn't at all make him sound like an idiot.

But KF and Null are the ones that don't understand social cues.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Just catching up with the Legal Mindset drama. is there a single bridge left anywhere that Rekieta has not burned?
Maybe the fat 50 year old white guy and his wine mom thot who'd stream from the Cuck Vault in-between sodomizing Nick's worn out asshole? Unless Our Wife chased them off for not being melanated enough.

Drexel too maybe? He's gotta stay cool with Nicky until his daughters turn 18 and he can teach her BDSM to save her from the Gay 90s Craiglist doms.
 
You are very much the company you keep, as the current company Nick has chosen for keep consists of a fat degenerate porn addict drag who lusts after a Vtuber (Coomalot), a black swinging bull who groomed the daughter of a woman he dated (Drexel), a washed up, Cuties and loli defending LA failure obsessed with destroying the business of a guy who makes comic book because of crabs in a bucket (Dick) and his fat, chomo sidekick (Vito). Plus the wine mom in a bikini and fat Australian who show up on his streams.
It's also true you are the company you don't keep, and ironically for someone who accused others of "alienating" those around them, he can be defined by all the people he's chosen to alienate over the last year.
 
No, you got to spend $3,000 on Doritos and other snacks, or it doesn't count. It's the size of the bill that makes him cool.

Nick really thinks sharing how much the Nanny buys in snacks each month makes him cool, and doesn't at all make him sound like an idiot.

But KF and Null are the ones that don't understand social cues.
If you spend $3000 on snacks, you shouldn't have a credit card. I don't care how cool it looks. That's a used car worth of junk food.
Yeah, Dick and Vito.

Which is the cause of like 90% of his problems.
It shocks me he sticks with those freaks of nature. But he also hangs out with a groomer, so I really shouldn't be. It's just sad I used to watch him.
 
Nick really thinks sharing how much the Nanny buys in snacks each month makes him cool, and doesn't at all make him sound like an idiot.
I've seen someone argue that Nick is lying about the 3k snack bill, that it would be impossible to spend that much per month on snacks alone. So either Nick actually does spend 3k on snacks because he's a dumbass or he's lying about spending 3k because he thinks it raises his social status. Either way he just looks like a retard.
Just catching up with the Legal Mindset drama. is there a single bridge left anywhere that Rekieta has not burned?
Dax. He already forced him to apologize and make up with Ralph.
Plus the wine mom in a bikini and fat Australian who show up on his streams.
Don't forget Legal Vices who has taken up the chief balldowashing spot after Legal Mindset decided to turn on him.
 
Besides his terminal wet brain I can't figure out why he wants to skip over every big money maker and go with what was popular yesterday.
Surely the smart move would be to start streaming the Fani Willis trial as that converges with Trial Stream, Trump and potential to bring in more guests
Rekieta's channel is all about last week's news today.

He will get to that next week.

He spent about a week's worth of shows, roughly 9 hours of three back to back shows covering the Vince McMahon lawsuit, savoring reading the coomer text messages and everything else last week, when it was already old news.

As far as I can tell, Rekieta had no plans to cover the Carano lawsuit. But he was asked about it in Locals, and then Legal Mindset criticized his take on the matter. Nick initially claimed that the Locals chatter wrongly told him it was a defamation lawsuit and that's why he was wrong, but then Elissa destroyed that excuse by putting it side by side with what the chatter actually asked and the excuse was false.

That means now Nick needs to spend multiple shows a week late arguing why he was actually right all along. Because the alternative is that Nick was wrong. And that can't be true. He can't just move on to a newer bigger more profitable topic that he's not seething over. If you don't understand that, you lack social media expertise.

You remind me... How is Nick's YT manager doing, I wonder...?
Rekieta mentioned the partner manager during that talk about Rumble as someone he could talk to, but wouldn't care about his schedule because they don't interact with the algorithm or anything. It seemed to be in the present tense, but he likes to merge actual reality with hypotheticals. I think he has actually written off YouTube for reasons only he can understand.
 
I've seen someone argue that Nick is lying about the 3k snack bill, that it would be impossible to spend that much per month on snacks alone. So either Nick actually does spend 3k on snacks because he's a dumbass or he's lying about spending 3k because he thinks it raises his social status. Either way he just looks like a retard.
Or he's just such a completely out of touch retard that his nanny is robbing him blind, claiming to be spending that, and since he is completely clueless, he doesn't realize what a cockamamie tale this is.

But when it's Nick, just assuming he's lying is usually the safer guess.
That means now Nick needs to spend multiple shows a week late arguing why he was actually right all along. Because the alternative is that Nick was wrong. And that can't be true. He can't just move on to a newer bigger more profitable topic that he's not seething over. If you don't understand that, you lack social media expertise.
Remember when he just used to be wrong about stuff that hadn't happened yet? Now he gets to be wrong about stuff that happened last week.
 
Rekieta mentioned the partner manager during that talk about Rumble as someone he could talk to, but wouldn't care about his schedule because they don't interact with the algorithm or anything. It seemed to be in the present tense, but he likes to merge actual reality with hypotheticals. I think he has actually written off YouTube for reasons only he can understand.
I vaguely recall his youtube contact reaching out while he was either banned, or shortly thereafter, asking what happened to his superchats. (As in one hand doesn't know what the other is doing at Youtube.) Obviously the superchats go down with a ban, and he was pushing Rumble and Locals in particular at that point. He just kind of laughed it off. Knowing Nick, he probably didn't respond and lost that contact most people would kill for.
 
Playboard returned $0 for YT and if that is true this is the lowest night i recall. Rumble viewers and chatters were super low as well. This was yet another waste of people's time and you'd think he'd get the idea that his viewers don't care after this. Sadly he will have a grand conspiracy that Rumble is now suppressing him.


Nick said 6 things and you see he is the good guy in this. He has fallen into the anti-anti-sjw trap and you see it's the anti-sjws who are the bad people.

RekietaLaw"@brofist I hate doing streams on something like Carano because I WANT TO SUPPORT HER. But this lawsuit is bad, looks like woke and SJW shit and is gayer than me"2024-02-16 02:56:54 -0600 CST


Seems the reason he can't stream is he can't use the room he has specifically for streaming and for which mommy and daddy bought him a new house. Maybe Kayla and her boyfriends are using it because it is soundproof and has AC?
RekietaLaw"@blorth I wish it was as simple as health, My friend. I RARELY cancel a stream for my own heaslth. Because, normally, I can FAKE health for 3-4 hours. I can't faked being unable to be in my studio"2024-02-16 02:55:21

------------------------
Total Rumbles: $ 41
Rumble Count: 12 ( 6 )
Conversion Rate Raw: 0.43258832011535686
Peak Viewers: 2774
Peaked time: 2024-02-16 01:16:11.966513033 -0600 CST m=+12225.275033501
------------------------
Chat Messages: 2057 ( 211 unique users )
Muted: 0
Deleted: 0
Unknown: 1
------------------------
StreamID: 260525208
Start: 2024-02-15 22:57:36.954218566 -0600 CST m=+3910.262739024
End: 2024-02-16 03:34:44.680839172 -0600 CST m=+20537.989359635
------------------------
StreamURL: https://rumble.com/v4dp8kx-gina-carano-lawsuit-part-2-of-the-complaint-review.html
------------------------
 

Załączniki

  • 260525208.7z
    260525208.7z
    59,2 KB · Wyświetlenia: 23
  • 260525208.png
    260525208.png
    45,4 KB · Wyświetlenia: 12
  • 260525208rants.csv
    260525208rants.csv
    2,7 KB · Wyświetlenia: 31
I've seen someone argue that Nick is lying about the 3k snack bill, that it would be impossible to spend that much per month on snacks alone. So either Nick actually does spend 3k on snacks because he's a dumbass or he's lying about spending 3k because he thinks it raises his social status. Either way he just looks like a retard.
Maybe he considers hard liquor to be a snack.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole