- Dołączono
- 18 Wrz 2019
Afrocentrists conflate North Africa with sub Saharan Africa all the time. For example Septimus Severus has the blacks shouting from the rooftops that he was a black emperor despite the fact that he was half Italian half Punic (descendants from Phoenicians).Not really. The earliest real evidence for any black person being in Britain is around the Tudor era - I think one or two were brought to the English court, probably by the Portuguese, and were employed as minstrels and the like.
In the 17th and 18th centuries it became fashionable to employ black servants - you can see a few of them in paintings of the period. Certainly no more than any other European country though. But they weren't more than like 0.001% of the population until after WWII. Definitely no evidence at all of black people being in Britain during the period of the Roman Empire, as much as some people desperately want to find it.
Edit: In the Vindolanda tablets (fort near hadrians wall) there was however a chap named Niger which they are desperately trying to saying is evidence of a black man.
I still want to know why there’s a Tik Tok trend saying King James I was black. But anyway end of my thread derailment carry on with the troons.
Ostatnio edytowane:
