Technically true. They didn't allow female members so she would at most have been an associate/hanger-on who said nigger a whole hell of a lot.
For the purpose of her denial - Weev stated in a screen shot (from cumtown?) she was not a member due to the charter for GNAA being boys only.
She did hang with the GNAA crew per Weev and the thread on her indicates pictures of her/data about her came from GNAA tied servers.
Calling her a member of GNAA is deniable and Weev statements of 'not a member' support a denial to 'member of GNAA'. "Hanger on of GNAA" is also words attributed to Weev.
The IRC logs have been denied as 'other people are called Jackie Singh' so she's claiming Jax isn't her because name collision with someone else. Less comments about the IRC isn't her VS she goes far harder on 'not a member of GNAA'.
While the GNAA is objectionable for many the posting tended to be copy paste about being gay and niggers, over and over. The IRC logs represent personal attacks on others as tranny/nigger/Jew and more of a problem for Jackie than saying 'I was just copy/pasting to get a rise outta people as a troll using no-no words'. The sleeping in the bed of an undersecretary is not a good look if you are claiming you are where you are because you have technical chops.
The IRC logs mention by the Washington Examiner may be the same IRC logs now public and the Examiner makes the claim they verified the veracity with 5(?) people. Perhaps there are people who have stepped forward about the IRC like Weev has about the GNAA. I just don't remember seeing it in the Jackie thread.
I know people in general are dumb but I’m kinda insulted on behalf of all people you assume don’t have the discernment to know how to interpret links and screenshots backed by third party archives and government documents, vs “lol he grinds nigger babies into artisanal meat”
The various people here are not the issue with respect to truth/doing a bit. The various people who've done some shit that is now documented need an excuse to deny their past and the standard is 'said on KF - therefore a lie'. By having bits like the pepperoni as a regular thing Patrick can say 'see this? Obviously a lie and the whole site is nothing but lies like that.' A person can opt to read a multi page thread along with all of Patrick's history and come to a conclusion or take Patrick at face value that he's been SWATted and people say he makes meat from humans. To play things straight enough for Patrick to have no grounds for 'KF lies' is just not in the culture of this place.....and that's ok. It's not like every post from Patrick is grounded in reality and if Patrick was 100% straight he would not have threads about him on various web sites.
Most people don't have time or emotional willingness for the shit here and will lean into Patrick support until they spend time with Patrick and end up walking away with as noted in the posting today "what the fuck is wrong with him?".
