2023 Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict

- Israel is uniquely threatened and can only trust its own might. This is seen in the debates around your (illegal) nuclear program
What makes a nuclear program "illegal?" Did Israel put a ban on its own nukes? Did they sign a treaty saying they wouldn't have any? Or is this a law that UN/NATO made up?
 
What makes a nuclear program "illegal?" Did Israel put a ban on its own nukes? Did they sign a treaty saying they wouldn't have any? Or is this a law that UN/NATO made up?
Technically not illegal but worth noting that if the West was consistent Israel would be under north korea/SA/Rhodesia tier sanctions.
 
You ain't special. Set that DEEP in your minds. We will not treat you special, ever.
There's a difference between wanting to be special and not wanting to commit national suicide.

I mean the Goldstone report concluded the IDF didn't have good evidence for hospital bombings so I was under the opinion that international panels aren't good sources...
You mean the same goldstone report that goldstone expressed regret over and wanted to be retracted?

Anyway polling among Palestinians from multiple sources has always had Hamas winning a majority of the vote, I don't find it surprising that Hamas won.
BTW, in the Ukraine thread, there are some Russian posters who acknowledge that what their country does is fucked up and should be condemned. Most of us who are sane are OK with doing this, principles above bloodline.
But, no, nope, not Israelis, not Jews. Whatever Israel does, whatever Jews do, there's a justification and was needed.
We set up the Oslo accords and recognized Palestine in exchange for terrorism to stop, terrorism didn't stop but we allowed them to keep the oslo concessions. They demanded 67 borders and Israel offered 90 percent of the west Bank,all of east Jerusalem, and Gaza multiple times to the Palestinians. They refused in 2002 and again in 2008. We gave them Gaza and free elections, they voted in Hamas.

Point out what Israel should have done differently in order to get a better outcome.
 
You mean the same goldstone report that goldstone expressed regret over and wanted to be retracted?
"They didn't do it on purpose guys, totally. Modern weapons just don't discriminate that much.." - Goldstone.

OK.

Thanks for the decontextualized input. But seriously, thanks for stopping the terrorism defense though, honestly the thread and world needs less of that in general.
 
The fun with WP doesn't even end there. Not only is it pyrophoric with the smoke turning to phosphoric acid when it gets in your eyes and lungs but it's also incredibly poisonous to boot. Even if you get that fire put out that burned your leg down to the bone you're almost certainly going to die from the poisoning.
Oh I know, was debating whether or not to mention it and figured the burning alone would get the point across on why there's restrictions on its use. But yes WP is really a bitch of a munition.
 
Technically not illegal but worth noting that if the West was consistent Israel would be under north korea/SA/Rhodesia tier sanctions.
Actually it is illegal under US law for the US government to be giving financial aid to nuclear powers that do not sign the NPT

There have been lawsuits over this and they get stonewalled. FOIA requests get "90% redacted"

If israel admits they have nukes then the USA cant legally be sending them billions every year. Everyone in DC including the POTUS who clearly knows they have nukes plays this game so they can illegally give Israel money every year. Thats why there is this weird ambiguity over them having them.

Like everything else with israel, no one can just tell the truth.
 
Actually it is illegal under US law for the US government to be giving financial aid to nuclear powers that do not sign the NPT

There have been lawsuits over this and they get stonewalled. FOIA requests get "90% redacted"

If Israel admits they have nukes then the USA cant legally be sending them billions every year. Every in DC including the POTUS who clearly knows they have nukes plays this game so they can illegally give Israel money every year. Thats why there is this weird ambiguity over them having them.
Yeah its totally great to have a rogue nuclear power extorting you by implying they'll nuke your allies in Western Europe.

Fucking hell.
 
Actually it is illegal under US law for the US government to be giving financial aid to nuclear powers that do not sign the NPT

There have been lawsuits over this and they get stonewalled. FOIA requests get "90% redacted"

If israel admits they have nukes then the USA cant legally be sending them billions every year. Everyone in DC including the POTUS who clearly knows they have nukes plays this game so they can illegally give Israel money every year. Thats why there is this weird ambiguity over them having them.

Like everything else with israel, no one can just tell the truth.

Can't be true. We give the pakis like 500 Million in military aid every year and they didn't sign.
 
Serious shit going on in Jenin, Several dropped tonight there with 2 of them being Mahmoud Al-Fayed and Muhammed Qatna source
1698195449912.png 1698195206160.png 1698195249083.png
1698195511298.png
 
implying they'll nuke your allies in Western Europe.
Where do they actually imply that? The only source I've found for the Samson option targeting western cities is an Israeli poem. Would make more sense to nuke all Arab countries instead of countries that would provide safeharbors for remaining Jews.

Serious shit going on in Jenin, Several dropped tonight there with 2 of them being Mahmoud Al-Fayed and Muhammed Qatna source
Wyświetl załącznik 5440801Wyświetl załącznik 5440778Wyświetl załącznik 5440785
Wyświetl załącznik 5440802
IDF executed a raid but were surrounded by Hamas aligned fighters in an ambush, had to turn off electricity to jenin and fight their way out.
 
Where do they actually imply that? The only source I've found for the Samson option targeting western cities is an Israeli poem. Would make more sense to nuke all Arab countries instead of countries that would provide safeharbors for remaining Jews.
Its been implied by journalists and analysts, I don't find it credible that a government including someone like Ben-Gvir wouldn't make a swing at the arch of Titus out of spite.

Personal reading of backroom dealings though, that's all, I should've worded my post better.
 
Its been implied by journalists and analysts, I don't find it credible that a government including someone like Ben-Gvir wouldn't make a swing at the arch of Titus out of spite.

Personal reading of backroom dealings though, that's all, I should've worded my post better.

So arab-loving retard head canon. got it.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole