💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Imagine you're a teenager, roughly 17-19. You heard that this guy from Dragon Ball is involved in a big ol' controversy, and you find this lawyer talking about the case. You watch his stuff and see he also talks about Google, guns, and various interesting legal topics. So you watch him more.
He's really chill, he likes to poke fun at weirdos, and overall you like the guy. He presents a clean cut image as well. Christian, traditional, loves his wife and kids, he's a solid guy. You might even respect him and be glad to see him do well in this whole YouTube thing.
Fast forward to 2023 and holy shit. It's not like he's some irredeemable monster, it's just that everything you liked about him has been slowly lost over time and now he's just some weird dude like all the others.

This one understands Revelations perfectly LOL!

TMFSquid​
Kjv version of revelations reads like either a really good acid trip, or from the pov of someone that has zero understanding or context to what's being seen
MrStirFry99​
it makes perfect sense to me, especially if you really understand what is going on in Genesis/Preflood times.
If it makes perfect sense to you, I'll be straight here you are schizophrenic.
 
Do you guys think the average person viewing this drama and sees this and will come to the conclusion that nick is neutral?
Yes, I think the direction of travel has been obvious since Eric July's implicit call out. July's fans will take that as a signal to jump on Nick and demand he get with the program, and his "ODD" will kick in and he will end up fully siding with Dick and Vito.
 
this faggot now openly defending Vito, I fucking knew it, Rekieta is probably one of the scummiest youtubers now, father of 5 protecting pedos.
Meanwhile his paypigs on locals are screaming for him to stream, while he spends his time defending Dax and Vito on twitter.
 
Nick doesn’t just wear a Balldo, he’s become one with the Balldo. And that Balldo is wrapped firmly around Dick Masterson’s nuts.

*sigh* He never pulled up.
 
Yes, I think the direction of travel has been obvious since Eric July's implicit call out. July's fans will take that as a signal to jump on Nick and demand he get with the program, and his "ODD" will kick in and he will end up fully siding with Dick and Vito.
Inb4 he ends up doing a Locals-only cuties watchparty.
 
Do you guys think the average person viewing this drama and sees this and will come to the conclusion that nick is neutral?
No. This concerns Dick. He's incapable of being neutral on Dick.

As I said in the other thread, his first video on his Youtube channel was about the Maddox lawsuit. He initially created his channel because of Dick.

Yes, I think the direction of travel has been obvious since Eric July's implicit call out. July's fans will take that as a signal to jump on Nick and demand he get with the program, and his "ODD" will kick in and he will end up fully siding with Dick and Vito.
Dude, let's not kid ourselves here. He'd side with Dick regardless. On practically anything. The fact July is involved in this is almost irrelevant. You could replace July with literally anybody, and that would still be true. He might not like Vito as much, but Vito is a package deal with Dick, so he's gonna defend him in deference to Dick.

I do agree though that July's callout is gonna cause people to trigger his ODD. He's already saying stupid shit like Dick and Vito don't REALLY like Cuties.
 
Which basically makes him a lying sack of shit.
You know his drug-riddled husk of a brain is just comtemplating saying something like "No guys, Dick and Pedo's....I mean Vito's, years long defense of Cuties was ironic. It was all jokes. You just don't understand because they're great comedians and you're not"
 
oh no no no
now we're almost at flamenco level of degeneracy with this one

what are you doing nick :story:
is there a context why he talked about bible black with drexel ?
I think a superchat brought it up, if not on that stream it was brought up via superchat on the occasional stream or two for weeks, if I remember correctly that is.
 
Bring charitable, Nick is right that it could be potentially disastrous for July to sue. He probably shouldn't. If he works out shit with the charity, he's not really out anything. Dick and Vito lose because the op didn't work.

OTOH, he's really underselling that e-mail. It can be connected to Dick and Vito via the "we" statement, among other things. It was intentionally crafted to fuck with July's business.

If somebody sent an e-mail like that to fuck with Nick, he's be losing his shit right now, and I think we all know it. He's got even less evidence that KF users are fucking with his business, but that stop him from whining to Null.
 
>Watches boat loads of creepy hardcore pornography
>Balldo in place
>Terabytes of torrent files (not the downloaded video mind you) sorted meticulously in his wankbank
>Most clicked: blacked.com complete, NTR, Jamaican resort amateur cams, Xia Anderson OnlyFans collection
>Why won't my wife have lots and lots of sex with me?

Gee, go figure, Balldo.
 
1) We already have receipts.

2) Anti-SLAPP wouldn't really be an issue here.

3) Actual malice is a given since Dick and Vito both know Eric July and obviously know he's not associated with ISOM.

4) Dick and his big brained self has already made incriminating tweets.

5) What he sues for is tortious interference.

6) He'd easily show $75k in damages because the lawsuit he's been engaged in would cost at least that much

Now, to clarify, I'm not saying any of these are correct or intelligent answers. I'm just saying they are the obvious answers that Eric would give and Nick pretending to be oblivious to them is, as he likes to say, weird.

It's funny because before Nick talked about it I was of the opinion that Eric July suing Dick and Vito would be a pointless waste of money unless he was only after discovery/public opinion points. But the more Nick talks about how Eric would definitely totally lose, the more I start thinking he might be able to win.

Maybe it can be called "Nick's Law". The more confident Rekieta is in a legal outcome, the more likely the opposite outcome will manifest.
 
It's funny because before Nick talked about it I was of the opinion that Eric July suing Dick and Vito would be a pointless waste of money unless he was only after discovery/public opinion points. But the more Nick talks about how Eric would definitely totally lose, the more I start thinking he might be able to win.

You know, at first I thought this was a clearcut example of a meritless lawsuit with no substantive evidence or provable damages, between two states that both heavily punish claims made by public figures like The Blaze employee Eric July, in a field with heavily established precedent in favor of the defendants.... but then Nick Rekieta said as much... now I don't know.

Maybe the defense attorney will come down with a terminal illness, like Mark Randazza. Maybe the judge will unexpectedly recognize Vito as the guy who tried to pick up his kid through discord. I don't know how, I don't know why, but thanks to the Rekieta Effect, Rippa's legal victory is all but assured at this point.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole