Disaster Gun control group slammed over claim Kyle Rittenhouse 'not held accountable' for 2020 shooting, despite trial - He still lives rent free in Bloomberg's mind

Article (Archive)

Critics ripped gun control group Moms Demand Action for a social media post claiming that Kyle Rittenhouse "was not held accountable" for killing two men and injuring another with his AR-15 rifle during a Black Lives Matter riot in 2020.

Even though a Wisconsin circuit judge ruled in 2021 that Rittenhouse was not guilty of all charges relating to the deaths of the two men and the injury of the other, Moms Demand Action claimed justice hadn’t been done in post on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Friday, which marked the three-year anniversary of the incident that happened during the riot in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Rittenhouse’s defenders slammed the post for ignoring that Rittenhouse had been through a highly publicized trial and judged as acting in self-defense against his attackers that day.

The progressive group posted, "Three years ago today, at a protest of the police shooting of Jacob Blake in Kenosha, WI, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse—who was openly carrying an AR-15-style rifle—shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, and wounded another man. Rittenhouse was not held accountable."

In a subsequent post, the group linked to an article from a gun control activist site noting that armed assemblies have a propensity to turn violent. In a caption for the post, Moms Demand Action added, "Since then, armed demonstrations—largely driven by far-right mobilization and reactions to left-wing activism—have continued. A study by @Everytown found that armed demonstrations are violent or destructive six times more often than unarmed demonstrations."

The claim that Rittenhouse didn’t receive justice for his actions outraged conservatives on the social media platform.

Townhall senior writer Julio Rosas, who was reporting at the Kenosha riots when they happened, amended the gun control group’s post. Stating, "Fixed your misleading post," Rosas shared an updated image of it marked up with edits in red.

Rosas version read, "Three years ago today, at a BLM riot of the justified police shooting of Jacob Blake, WI, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse—who was openly carrying an AR-15-style rifle—shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, and wounded another man in self-defense. Rittenhouse was found not guilty in a court by a jury."

Medical research and conservative X user Forest Garner responded to the post, stating, "He was held accountable. There was a trial and everything. It was in the news. The verdict based on the actual evidence was that he was not guilty of any crime."

Pro-Second Amendment account "Texas Gun Rights" replied to Moms Demand Action, saying, "Cope and seethe."

Conservative X user Justine added, "Yes the jury ruled that it’s acceptable to shoot people trying to lynch you."

After a multitude of angry replies hit the original post, Moms Demand Action turned off the ability for general users on the site to comment on it, only allowing accounts it follows or mentioned in the post to reply.
 
It's not just anti-gun groups.. progs and dem ghouls of all sorts talk about him like he is a murderer who at best got off on a technicality. They don't care (or know) about the facts, the narrative is the only thing that matters.
 
It's not just anti-gun groups.. progs and dem ghouls of all sorts talk about him like he is a murderer who at best got off on a technicality. They don't care (or know) about the facts, the narrative is the only thing that matters.
I remember people finding out that Rittenhouse didn't shoot black people after the trial. There was wall to wall coverage about him and the three dudes he shot, his trial was publicly broadcasted where two of the deceased were shown and the third person he shot took the stand. And yet, because these people don't educate themselves or fight misinformation (like they claim they do, and need to restrict you for your own good), they would've thought Rittenhouse shot up some darkies. And it was with that thought, they were so anti-Rittenhouse, because he was some sort of evil racist looking to shoot up a protest for a black dude.
 
Spacebattlers been arguing semantics that Kyle isn't "innocent" but is guilty of murder but the court and jury rule him not guilty of it.
That place's reaction to him was horrifying. Didn't they get a splinter thread off the main riots one for the Kyle incident where it got shut down within a page or two because the video was out there and 100% showed he was in the right, so as such discussion had to stop because it was showing a lot of posters for what they were?

I had hope when they realised the Smollett story exposed a lot of them as insane people and seemed to cause some introspection but roll on 2020 and it was the same story again. Interestingly now on an internet search neither the main riot threads, Rittenhouse ones or Smollett show up. Not certain if they deleted them or locked them away so it was harder to identify all the posters there who are unironically saying "murder white people."
 
Joseph Rosenbaum
^^this faggot was an irredeemable kiddie fiddler. Kyle's first bullet shattered the motherfucker's pelvis. I've watched all the footage - Rosenbaum died in agony, whinging like a ruptured moose. I watched those particular 4:00m several times, and few things in life have ever given me so much pleasure.

As far as I'm concerned, they should dig him up and shoot him some more. Asshole had it coming and then some.
 
I remember people finding out that Rittenhouse didn't shoot black people after the trial. There was wall to wall coverage about him and the three dudes he shot, his trial was publicly broadcasted where two of the deceased were shown and the third person he shot took the stand. And yet, because these people don't educate themselves or fight misinformation (like they claim they do, and need to restrict you for your own good), they would've thought Rittenhouse shot up some darkies. And it was with that thought, they were so anti-Rittenhouse, because he was some sort of evil racist looking to shoot up a protest for a black dude.
Lol Kyle would have been 100% innocent if he had ventilated 3 hood rats attacking him, too.

Leftists literally worship niggers.
 
True. This should have come along with the removal of block, hell, before it.
It might actually be funnier to keep the whole disabling replies thing, but when you hit that it ends up showing the quote tweets directly under your original tweet.
When you block a post, you don't see it any more, but everyone else sees it and any other replies to you from that person displayed prominently under your post.
 
notice how they conveniently leave out the third guy, Grosskreutz, had a gun himself and admitted to pointing at kyle. somehow that gun wasnt a bad gun, unlike kyle's.
I don't know why they don't point that out, it's living proof that the 'good guy with a gun' meme is bullshit. A good guy had a gun, and Kyle just shot him anyway.
 
^^this faggot was an irredeemable kiddie fiddler. Kyle's first bullet shattered the motherfucker's pelvis. I've watched all the footage - Rosenbaum died in agony, whinging like a ruptured moose. I watched those particular 4:00m several times, and few things in life have ever given me so much pleasure.

As far as I'm concerned, they should dig him up and shoot him some more. Asshole had it coming and then some.
Yep

Kyle literally took out the trash that night.
 
They originally were trying to say he did and that myth still persists on twitter.
I see a lot of frustrating similarities between the political left and the political right camps, but this caliber of echo chamber really is exclusive to the left. Right-wingers can be just as ridiculous in their interpretation of the facts, but I don't see them creating entire bizarre alternate realities where they insist something happened despite trivially-obtained and incontrovertible evidence to the contrary.

It's one thing to believe OJ should've been convicted - it's another thing to insist years later that he should've been convicted because he totally murdered all the toddlers in a daycare.
 
The second guy that Rittenhouse shot at was a black guy that drop kicked him, and he missed, but it appeared that he only missed a head shot by a matter of inches.

Screen Shot 2023-08-26 at 10.59.44 AM.png

A mere few inches, and I think it would've been a very different trail, and probably a different outcome.

Due process and sanity gets thrown out the window when the left loses one of their pet niggers at the hands of a literal Nazi.

Dropkick Nig never testified, nor do I believe he was ever positively identified, but I think his identity was known, but he had a long record of the standard offenses of criminal niggitry, and his testimony would've hurt the prosecution more than it would've helped them, and so the mainstream media just pretended that he didn't exist at all.
 
Dropkick Nig never testified, nor do I believe he was ever positively identified, but I think his identity was known, but he had a long record of the standard offenses of criminal niggitry, and his testimony would've hurt the prosecution more than it would've helped them, and so the mainstream media just pretended that he didn't exist at all.
His identity actually came out DURING the trial, if I remember correctly. But yes, he was a career criminal, just like everybody else who was out burning shit down "for justice" that night.
 
Facts and evidence don't matter to people. Most people who believe Kyle Rittenhouse is a literal murderer because the media for nearly a year said this White surpremacist murderer/killer.

Even though the case as justified, you have just because of media hysteria people who believe that he went out there to murder innocent black and brown protesters. This is merely from the words prescribed to him without evidence.
 
The ride never ends.

FYI:
Anti-gun groups are now funding "strategic lawsuits against self defense" cases against Kyle.


If anyone has GOP party ties at the state level, I do recommend reaching out to pass "anti-SLASD" laws using the same formula as "anti-SLAPP" laws.

EXCLUSIVE: Kyle Rittenhouse Sued by Estate of Criminal He Shot in Self-Defense (Archive)

On August 25, 2020, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse shot three men, killing two, in self-defense during a Black Lives Matter protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Now, the estate of Joseph Rosenbaum is suing Rittenhouse, Kenosha officials, local Sheriff’s departments, the City of Kenosha, the City of West Allis, and several counties for “compensatory and punitive damages” for the “wrongful death” of Rosenbaum.

During the Kenosha incident, Rosenbaum confronted and chased Rittenhouse, eventually throwing a sack of items at him. According to witness testimony, Rosenbaum reached for Rittenhouse’s gun. Rittenhouse then fired four times, killing Rosenbaum. Ultimately, Rosenbaum’s death set off a chain of events that led to another death and injury as Rittenhouse protected himself from a mob of protestors.

During Rittenhouse’s trial, Rosenbaum’s fiancee testified to his extensive mental health issues. It was also uncovered that Rosenbaum spent most of his adult life in prison for sexual contact with five preteen boys.

Rittenhouse was acquitted of all criminal charges in 2021 and has since moved to Texas.

“These lawsuits are making it harder and harder for me to move on with my life,” Rittenhouse told Texas Scorecard. “It is extremely difficult to go outside without fear of being harassed or assaulted because of the lies spread in these lawsuits. No one should have to continue to defend the fact that they acted in self defense.”
 
They originally were trying to say he did and that myth still persists on twitter.
And at least one work of academia. Someone published an Egypt history work for National Geographic that included the claim that Kyle murdered 3 black people.

So they can't count and don't know history from years ago but are qualified to write books on ancient history. Need much more be said about "experts."
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole