Disaster Biden's alcohol czar warns Americans could soon be told to limit themselves to just two beers per WEEK under strict new booze guidelines - Virtual prohibition will surely work out better than actual prohibition did!

Article | Archive

Biden's alcohol czar warns Americans could soon be told to limit themselves to just two beers per WEEK under strict new booze guidelines​

  • Dr George Koob said America could slash its drinking guidelines
  • Warned that alcohol raised the risk of cancer, heart disease and other issues
  • READ MORE: New York woman, 104, credits long life to a beer every night
By LUKE ANDREWS HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

UPDATED: 15:07 EDT, 24 August 2023

Americans could officially be urged to drink no more than two beers a week as part of strict new alcohol guidelines.

Biden's health czar told DailyMail.com the USDA could revise its alcohol advice to match Canada's, where people are advised to have just two drinks per week.

Dr George Koob — who admits enjoying a couple of glasses of Chardonnay a week — said he was watching Canada's 'big experiment' with interest.

'If there's health benefits, I think people will start to re-evaluate where we're at [in the US],' he told DailyMail.com.

Current US recommendations say women can have up to one bottle of beer, small glass of wine or shot of spirit a day while men can have two.

But those guidelines are up for review in 2025.

Dr George Koob, who directs the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, said the US could lower its alcohol recommendations to match those in Canada

Per the US guidelines, a drink is defined as containing 0.6 fluid ounces of alcohol, equivalent to one beer, one glass of wine at 12 percent alcohol or one shot.

Asked in what direction the guidelines could change, Dr George Koob, the director for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), said: 'I mean, they're not going to go up, I'm pretty sure.

'So, if [alcohol consumption guidelines] go in any direction, it would be toward Canada.'

The guidelines are currently under review, although the updated versions may not be published until the end of 2025.

The debate about whether alcohol is good in low amounts has been around for decades, but increasingly studies show that even a small amount can harm your health.

A major study from this June warned that drinking any amount of alcohol raised the risk of someone suffering 60 diseases, including 33 that had never been linked to booze before.

Liver cirrhosis — scarring caused by continuous, long-term liver damage — strokes and cancer are already well-established risks of excess boozing.

But the Oxford University-led study, which analyzed data from half a million men living in China, also drew links to other conditions like gout and cataracts.

Dr Koob told DailyMail.com that there were 'no benefits' to drinking alcohol in terms of physical health.

He said: 'Most of the benefits people attribute to alcohol, we feel they really have more to do with what someone's eating rather than what they're drinking.

'So it really has to do with the Mediterranean diet, socio-economic status, that makes you able to afford that kind of diet and make your own fresh food and so forth.
'With this in mind, most of the benefits kind of disappear on the health side.'

But he did give ground to social benefits, describing alcohol as a 'social lubricant'.

Dr Koob said he consumes around two glasses of white wine per week, usually a 'buttery Californian Chardonnay'.

College girls are more likely to binge drink than boys for the first time in American history, Biden's alcohol czar revealed earlier this year
Canadian health chiefs admitted their new rules may be a 'bit shocking' when they were announced earlier this year.

The review process for Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025 to 2030 has already begun — although the final version may not be published until the end of 2025.
America has been recommending a safe limit of up to two drinks per day for adult men and one for women since the 1990s.

In the past, studies suggested there may be some benefits to drinking — with resveratrol in red wine linked to a reduced risk of cancer and improved heart health.

In more recent years, the research has gone the other way, warning even consuming a small amount of alcohol is dangerous for health.

A report released in 2020 from a federal committee of experts warned that drinking raised the risk of cancer, saying limits should be slashed to just one beverage a day.

And in 2021 a report from the American Cancer Society warned alcohol was behind as many as one in 20 cancer cases in the US — or 25,000 annually.

It found alcohol raised the risk of both rarer cancers, like those of the throat, and more common ones such as breast cancer — the most common in women.

More recent research involving 370,000 people warned that drinking more led to a 1.4-fold rise in someone's risk of heart disease.

Top authorities including the World Health Organization have seized on the studies to warn that drinking even a small amount puts someone's health in danger.

It was this growing body of evidence — and their own analysis of 6,000 studies — that convinced Canadian health chiefs to overturn their alcohol guidelines in favor of up to two drinks per week earlier this year.

Previously, they had suggested women could have up to ten drinks per week while men could have 15 — similar to the limits set in the US.

The move quickly came in for criticism from some quarters, however, who accused authorities of 'ignoring' the benefits of drinking — including how it can help in social situations and with combatting loneliness.

Dr Dan Malleck, a health sciences expert at Brock University in Canada, said: 'Alcohol infuses many lives in many positive ways.

'We celebrate accomplishments, mark occasions, bring wine to parties, meeting with friends, commiserate, relax, blow off steam... these are important activities, and part of the texture and tone of many lives.'

Experts have previously argued that studies into the risks of alcohol are flawed because they fail to examine these social benefits.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
By the way the major study mentioned by the article is sketchy at best:
Researchers from Oxford teamed up with academics at both Peking University and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences for the study.

They examined data from a Chinese database containing the health information of more than 512,000 adults, aged 52 on average. It included details on their drinking patterns.


512k seems like a massive sample until you realize it is China and you cannot trust their data.

I am sure this is just another conspiracy theory!
Asians are notorious for not being able to handle alcohol, sometimes even more than one drink is too much.
I definitely wouldn't trust a study that didn't use a wide variety of different races and compare and contrast the effects long term.
 
I can’t think of one person I know who changed their drinking behaviour because of leaf government recommendations. Everyone my age remembers the food pyramid (1 serving protein, 8 carbs per day LOL)

Not much of a drinker myself, but I leave others to make their own choices.
 
Alcohol does not depopulate the planet rapidly enough, and drunks cost the State a lot of money medically until they die.
Fentanyl is much quicker and more likely to cause a quick death and is more popular among the youth, hopefully killing them before they can populate the planet with more useless eaters.
It's the Plan.
 
That's horrendous, I hope that's just a UK perspective because I'm honest about this stuff and I'd hate some doctor to assume I'm lying and have that affect my care, it's so stupid and arrogant. Britain is famous for their drunkenness and lie-bragging though, so I understand the impulse.
The medical establishment just don't care and I'm sure that happens here as well. Powerlevel,but fuck it since just went through my 2nd eye surgery this year to correct the double vision I developed about 6 months after I first started showing symptoms of my health falling off a cliff and am on some good ass painkillers.
So when I started showing symptoms basically daily intense headaches, and then 6 months later double vision I went to a VA neurologist and eye doctor. Ran all kinds of tests that showed some abnormal results such as lowered hemoglobin, extremely high kappa free light chains (biomarker for multiple myeloma), about 5 others that were substantially outside the normal range. The funniest one which was a syphilis test that was done 3 times on my blood and once on spinal fluid. First time was mildly reactive, 2nd reactive, 3rd mildly reactive, and spinal fluid nothing detected, so infectious disease specialists said no syphilis (fuck you don't know what it's like to pray for syphilis just so you can get a treatment and return to a normal life). Then more headaches started piling on.....gi and urinary issues, random muscle twitches and spasms, dizziness, brain fog, numbness and burning feeling all over body in random spots, joint/muscle pain, became iron deficient anemic, lost consciousness once, and a bunch more latest is rashes and flare ups after UV exposure. But even though all these symptoms were going on and with the results no doctor wanted to explore more or figure out what was going on. For the next year I basically existed and doped up on what ever non pain relief pill they pushed to try and treat the symptoms and gained a shitload of weight from like 6 different meds and was in no shape to work out. Even though I had all these symptoms I didn't meet criteria or another different test would rule out a disease (like with the kappa free light chains you also need a m-spike protein on a 24 hr urine which I didn't have and my ANA was negative) so was never diagnosed with anything or given a treatment because they just quit looking. Then had a therapist who I was seeing put a diagnosis of Somatic disorder (basically its all in my head) in my chart and shit became harder. I sent to be seen outside of the VA system (built they sent my records), and the same type of shit happened abnormal blood test results and still not trying to find an issue. Since I was over concerned with symptoms and thus causing my symptoms was their logic in diagnosing that.

Meanwhile my symptoms keep getting worse (the left side of my body is basically junk right now). I was sent to a neuro-opthamalagist who said my double vision was caused by me always having a lazy eye and for some reason my brain could no longer correct it. I tried to explain I've never had a lazy eye, brought pictures for him to look at, told him it probably would of kept me from joining the military and the least be noted in my entrance records (it wasnt) and recommended surgery. At the time I needed an 8 diopter prism in glasses to see a single image. I decided to wait on surgery because I felt it was whatever was wrong with me causing the double vision and if that was ever fixed would probably need another surgery to undo it. So went the next 3 years wearing basically Prof Farnsworth (futurama) glasses.

About a year later I did get lucky and saw a really good neurologist. The first appointment he said he thinks I have an autoimmune disorder and a small fiber/autonomic neuropathy that resulted from it. So he tested all the autoimmune disorder stuff again (still negative lol). He said he is sure it is an autoimmune disorder due to my symptoms and how it evolved and the anthrax vaxcines and every other vaccine I was given no other with no familial or other environmental risk factors. , but new autoimmune disorders are "discovered or how to diagnose em" everyday and would try me on prednisone to see if it helps. I developed an ulcer my first week on it so it was stopped. And he ordered a skin biopsy to check for the small fiber/autonomic neuropathy which had never been done on me before and should have. The first time it was negative (they used my right side). The 2nd my left side, it came back un mistakably positive and the way they do it is they take 3 slices of skin from three sites (thigh, shin, and foot). My foot had half the normal number of small fiber nerves and shin 3/4 normal, thigh under normal also but forgot the ratio. The first one didn't have any sweat glands for the autonomic portion but the 2nd one also did not so he was able to diagnose that since at leadt 1 should of been found between the 2. Just more objective evidence (besides the abnormal labwork), mri's etc there was something going on there.

In October of last year decided I wanted to try and not have to wear the Farnsworth glasses so went back to the neuro-opth and again tried to let him know I've never had a lazy eye he still said I did and surgery was the way to go so I said ok. Met with the surgeon in December and told her the same thing. She said she agreed with the neuro-opth and we scheduled it for January. Had the surgery and at the post op appt the next Monday (surgery was the previous friday), I was able to mostly see single but still needed a 2 diopter to be consistent. Since it was still healing it could also go back to none and we would check at the next follow up 2 weeks later. That one I was at a 4, so we're still watching it. For my 6 week followup I was back at an 8, and my right eye wasn't healing as good/as fast as my left so she wanted me to follow up again in another 2 weeks (and she opened the stitches on my left eye to try and adjust again and got me back down to a 4). 8 week follow up comes and I'm back to a 12. Her recommendation was to do a 2nd one in 6 months and she will try to adjust some other muscles on the other side of my eyeball.
That surgery was today. After she came to check on me I asked her what the plan would be if I again start seeing double or start to need a prism again. Her response was "if that happens we need to recheck you for myasthenia gravis" That's an autoimmune disorder that quite often occur with other autoimmune disorders.

So far I've only seen a single image consistently (the first time it was inconsistent). So I'm kind of torn. On one hand part of me want it to be fixed now and be wrong about it being linked so that it is truly fixed. And on the other part of me hopes it does come back so that at least another doc will hopefully start looking closer to find what's driving all this that hopefully leads to a good diagnosis and treatment (while there isn't really a treatment for the small fiber/autonomic nerve stuff there is a chance once what ever caused it is fixed it will heal) so that I can have a normal quality of life and not have 22 a day. And I've never asked for pain killers except after the surgeries. I did try weed for the first time into it a couple years back and it did nothing but caused sky high anxiety. Tried CBD, acupuncture, TEMs etc which all did not help.

Sorry so long winded text wall and PL and to tie back into the reply. Had a doc not made assumptions/did their job/just listened to what I was saying, quit ignoring the shit that pointed to a problem at the beginning/middle of this 8 fucking years of my life wouldn't be gone for nothing short of what can best be described as surviving agony.

Edit: added to apology also fuck it I'm high on pain killers.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I'm not American and my country is suffering from a wine glut because the chinks stopped buying our plonk, so I'm doing my best to help get through the stockpile one box at a time.

This so-called "Doctor" Koob can slurp my turgid root.
 
By the way the major study mentioned by the article is sketchy at best:
Researchers from Oxford teamed up with academics at both Peking University and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences for the study.

They examined data from a Chinese database containing the health information of more than 512,000 adults, aged 52 on average. It included details on their drinking patterns.


512k seems like a massive sample until you realize it is China and you cannot trust their data.

I am sure this is just another conspiracy theory!

Especially when you consider that they are very conservative about this kind of stuff too. Anything that even slightly gives the impression of negative for society. (i.e. productivity) As a person vice I mean.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
That's horrendous, I hope that's just a UK perspective because I'm honest about this stuff and I'd hate some doctor to assume I'm lying and have that affect my care, it's so stupid and arrogant. Britain is famous for their drunkenness and lie-bragging though, so I understand the impulse.

The "hidden curriculum" in leafland taught us to double reported alcohol consumption self-reports as well, so it's not just bongistan.
 
If you elect me president I will return beer to the basics: Mesopotamian beer which was basically an alcoholic protein shake, you would eat beer all day and drunk-build ziggurats for the anunnaki.

Remember: a vote for cybertoaster is a vote for gilgamesh!
 
If you elect me president I will return beer to the basics: Mesopotamian beer which was basically an alcoholic protein shake, you would eat beer all day and drunk-build ziggurats for the anunnaki.

Remember: a vote for cybertoaster is a vote for gilgamesh!

It will be a lot trickier to fortify the election if it switches from mail-in ballots to cuneiform tablets.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole