Disaster Biden's alcohol czar warns Americans could soon be told to limit themselves to just two beers per WEEK under strict new booze guidelines - Virtual prohibition will surely work out better than actual prohibition did!

Article | Archive

Biden's alcohol czar warns Americans could soon be told to limit themselves to just two beers per WEEK under strict new booze guidelines​

  • Dr George Koob said America could slash its drinking guidelines
  • Warned that alcohol raised the risk of cancer, heart disease and other issues
  • READ MORE: New York woman, 104, credits long life to a beer every night
By LUKE ANDREWS HEALTH REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

UPDATED: 15:07 EDT, 24 August 2023

Americans could officially be urged to drink no more than two beers a week as part of strict new alcohol guidelines.

Biden's health czar told DailyMail.com the USDA could revise its alcohol advice to match Canada's, where people are advised to have just two drinks per week.

Dr George Koob — who admits enjoying a couple of glasses of Chardonnay a week — said he was watching Canada's 'big experiment' with interest.

'If there's health benefits, I think people will start to re-evaluate where we're at [in the US],' he told DailyMail.com.

Current US recommendations say women can have up to one bottle of beer, small glass of wine or shot of spirit a day while men can have two.

But those guidelines are up for review in 2025.

Dr George Koob, who directs the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, said the US could lower its alcohol recommendations to match those in Canada

Per the US guidelines, a drink is defined as containing 0.6 fluid ounces of alcohol, equivalent to one beer, one glass of wine at 12 percent alcohol or one shot.

Asked in what direction the guidelines could change, Dr George Koob, the director for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), said: 'I mean, they're not going to go up, I'm pretty sure.

'So, if [alcohol consumption guidelines] go in any direction, it would be toward Canada.'

The guidelines are currently under review, although the updated versions may not be published until the end of 2025.

The debate about whether alcohol is good in low amounts has been around for decades, but increasingly studies show that even a small amount can harm your health.

A major study from this June warned that drinking any amount of alcohol raised the risk of someone suffering 60 diseases, including 33 that had never been linked to booze before.

Liver cirrhosis — scarring caused by continuous, long-term liver damage — strokes and cancer are already well-established risks of excess boozing.

But the Oxford University-led study, which analyzed data from half a million men living in China, also drew links to other conditions like gout and cataracts.

Dr Koob told DailyMail.com that there were 'no benefits' to drinking alcohol in terms of physical health.

He said: 'Most of the benefits people attribute to alcohol, we feel they really have more to do with what someone's eating rather than what they're drinking.

'So it really has to do with the Mediterranean diet, socio-economic status, that makes you able to afford that kind of diet and make your own fresh food and so forth.
'With this in mind, most of the benefits kind of disappear on the health side.'

But he did give ground to social benefits, describing alcohol as a 'social lubricant'.

Dr Koob said he consumes around two glasses of white wine per week, usually a 'buttery Californian Chardonnay'.

College girls are more likely to binge drink than boys for the first time in American history, Biden's alcohol czar revealed earlier this year
Canadian health chiefs admitted their new rules may be a 'bit shocking' when they were announced earlier this year.

The review process for Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025 to 2030 has already begun — although the final version may not be published until the end of 2025.
America has been recommending a safe limit of up to two drinks per day for adult men and one for women since the 1990s.

In the past, studies suggested there may be some benefits to drinking — with resveratrol in red wine linked to a reduced risk of cancer and improved heart health.

In more recent years, the research has gone the other way, warning even consuming a small amount of alcohol is dangerous for health.

A report released in 2020 from a federal committee of experts warned that drinking raised the risk of cancer, saying limits should be slashed to just one beverage a day.

And in 2021 a report from the American Cancer Society warned alcohol was behind as many as one in 20 cancer cases in the US — or 25,000 annually.

It found alcohol raised the risk of both rarer cancers, like those of the throat, and more common ones such as breast cancer — the most common in women.

More recent research involving 370,000 people warned that drinking more led to a 1.4-fold rise in someone's risk of heart disease.

Top authorities including the World Health Organization have seized on the studies to warn that drinking even a small amount puts someone's health in danger.

It was this growing body of evidence — and their own analysis of 6,000 studies — that convinced Canadian health chiefs to overturn their alcohol guidelines in favor of up to two drinks per week earlier this year.

Previously, they had suggested women could have up to ten drinks per week while men could have 15 — similar to the limits set in the US.

The move quickly came in for criticism from some quarters, however, who accused authorities of 'ignoring' the benefits of drinking — including how it can help in social situations and with combatting loneliness.

Dr Dan Malleck, a health sciences expert at Brock University in Canada, said: 'Alcohol infuses many lives in many positive ways.

'We celebrate accomplishments, mark occasions, bring wine to parties, meeting with friends, commiserate, relax, blow off steam... these are important activities, and part of the texture and tone of many lives.'

Experts have previously argued that studies into the risks of alcohol are flawed because they fail to examine these social benefits.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
As usual, this is just going to materialize in a tax raise on alcohol. The government is looking out for you my friend, that's why they bleed you dry.

Fuck them and fuck their guidelines. Nobody ever campaigned to elect surrogate parents. These people are just bored delusional narcissists.

I would like to see an independent study on whether or not lining them up against a wall would benefit society.
 
Don't do anything to make American life better or easier to where people wouldn't need to drink so much. Just keep everything shitty/the same and tell people to stop consuming the alcohol they need to get through the shitty life you and your capitalist friends made for them. I'm sure this will work.

75-80% of alcoholism in the US is work related.
 
A major study from this June warned that drinking any amount of alcohol raised the risk of someone suffering 60 diseases, including 33 that had never been linked to booze before.
Guess "Long COVID" isn't selling anymore.
 
Please, please, please let them be stupid enough to get full of the same hubris they had with everything else, and go full tilt into this. Please let them ban booze.

I've learned to be cautious about "x will result in y" statements in clownworld, but this would be one of the quickest ways for them to accelerate shit beyond their control. Had prohibition been combined with the great depression there probably would've been blood in the streets, people will do some crazy shit when in booze withdrawal, and unlike the time of prohibition 1.0 we have no sense of national cohesiveness, people are struggling to put food on the table or work, and coming home to drink their troubles away is one of the few solaces Americans have now. Take that away, please, I want to watch millions of drunks slowly become sober and angry.
 
By the way the major study mentioned by the article is sketchy at best:
Researchers from Oxford teamed up with academics at both Peking University and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences for the study.

They examined data from a Chinese database containing the health information of more than 512,000 adults, aged 52 on average. It included details on their drinking patterns.


512k seems like a massive sample until you realize it is China and you cannot trust their data.

I am sure this is just another conspiracy theory!
You can't trust self reported diet data as it's extremely suspectable to variables that cannot be controlled for.

That's why we get contradictory articles every year saying X is good then X is fucking bad.

The only way to do such a study would be to lock everyone up in solitary confinement.
 
As usual, this is just going to materialize in a tax raise on alcohol. The government is looking out for you my friend, that's why they bleed you dry.

Fuck them and fuck their guidelines. Nobody ever campaigned to elect surrogate parents. These people are just bored delusional narcissists.

I would like to see an independent study on whether or not lining them up against a wall would benefit society.
Its like they want to create the biggest shadow economy possible.
 
They really need to quantify the risk into digestible numbers in order to allow people to make informed decisions and decide if the juice is worth the squeeze to reduce alcohol consumption drastically to public health's ever shrinking recommendations.

What's the improvement in all-cause mortality for hitting their targets?

Alcohol could use a longitudinal population study similar to the Framingham study for risk factors for heart health.

Framingham allowed the creation of personalized calculators allowing estimation of 10-year cardiovascular risk and how many percentage points of improvement if you say, cut your cholesterol or stopped smoking.

The Framingham risk scores also reveal from an actuarial perspective that age essentially trumps all.

Your biggest risk factor for bad things happening is getting old, and there's not much you can do about that.

It also showed that cholesterol drug guidelines are really a scam, as people with zero risk factors for heart disease will still score high enough to be recommended drugs solely based on their advancing age alone.

Shouldn't we be worrying more about the effects of fentanyl and tranq and Xanax and all of the other high powered drugs instead of people drinking a a six pack now and then?

Funny how it's abstinence-only for alcoholics with no "harm reduction" or "safe supply" advocates.

Hospitals used to keep beer on their pharmacy formularies so that doctors could prescribe drunks a few beers a night so they didn't go into DTs and go psychotic when admitted. This got replaced at some point by benzo protocols, which work well but are a lot less fun.
 
If you're worried about people's drinking habits, maybe you shouldn't be making life hard to get through sober. Let's not forget that the government helped create a million more alcoholics and drug addicts with two years of lockdowns, and a million more with inflation and the recession.
 
Tobacco banned, alcohol banned, drugs legal.
Either make all shit legal or leave just tobacco and alcohol as is. There seems to be something big going on with this drug push.
See also: New Zealand and it's retarded absolute ban on tobacco for people born past a certain birthdate. They also had a referendum to legalize weed but that thankfully failed.
 
Tobacco banned, alcohol banned, drugs legal.
Either make all shit legal or leave just tobacco and alcohol as is. There seems to be something big going on with this drug push.
See also: New Zealand and it's retarded absolute ban on tobacco for people born past a certain birthdate. They also had a referendum to legalize weed but that thankfully failed.
Nixon had some spicy opinions about weed and why legalization was being pushed.
 
Remember we all need to live as long as possible and spend as many years as possible shitting ourselves to justify immigration, nursing homes and muh growth

You can live till you're 200 retard, you're still going to die

Can everyone stop being an utter coward and come to terms with it
 
It's crazy when you see how people self-report how much they drink vs how much is sold per capitia. Lots of liars out there
The GPs I know tell me that they mentally double and add a bit when people self report.
I barely drink. I wouldn’t say I’m teetotal because if I fancied a drink I’d have one and sometimes I do. But I think it’s been well over a year since I last felt like it. People my age tend to have gone down the route of not being bothered about it and the occasional one now and again or hardcore boozers.
I think people need to be given honest info and then left to make the choice themselves. Some people can happily have a tiny nip at bedtime for life or a small red wine with dinner, or a few beers over the football. Others have terrible problems. You can’t regulate it without removing peoples freedom only give people correct info and let them decide
Massive x to doubt on this study though. Chinese alcohol metabolism is not informative for westerners.
Amazing they do this then push the idea on pregnant woman that one or two units once or twice a week is just fine, when it isn’t. Alcohol is a teratogen
 
The GPs I know tell me that they mentally double and add a bit when people self report.
I barely drink. I wouldn’t say I’m teetotal because if I fancied a drink I’d have one and sometimes I do. But I think it’s been well over a year since I last felt like it. People my age tend to have gone down the route of not being bothered about it and the occasional one now and again or hardcore boozers.
I think people need to be given honest info and then left to make the choice themselves. Some people can happily have a tiny nip at bedtime for life or a small red wine with dinner, or a few beers over the football. Others have terrible problems. You can’t regulate it without removing peoples freedom only give people correct info and let them decide
Massive x to doubt on this study though. Chinese alcohol metabolism is not informative for westerners.
Amazing they do this then push the idea on pregnant woman that one or two units once or twice a week is just fine, when it isn’t. Alcohol is a teratogen
It's rough. Probably 30% or so drink 90% of all the booze sold. I'm in that middle area, but been on both sides of it. It's almost Star Wars -esque. The dark side is easier, more seductive, but destroys you. The way out is hard, but more rewarding in the end.
 
The GPs I know tell me that they mentally double and add a bit when people self report.
That's horrendous, I hope that's just a UK perspective because I'm honest about this stuff and I'd hate some doctor to assume I'm lying and have that affect my care, it's so stupid and arrogant. Britain is famous for their drunkenness and lie-bragging though, so I understand the impulse.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole