Disaster Gun control group slammed over claim Kyle Rittenhouse 'not held accountable' for 2020 shooting, despite trial - He still lives rent free in Bloomberg's mind

Article (Archive)

Critics ripped gun control group Moms Demand Action for a social media post claiming that Kyle Rittenhouse "was not held accountable" for killing two men and injuring another with his AR-15 rifle during a Black Lives Matter riot in 2020.

Even though a Wisconsin circuit judge ruled in 2021 that Rittenhouse was not guilty of all charges relating to the deaths of the two men and the injury of the other, Moms Demand Action claimed justice hadn’t been done in post on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Friday, which marked the three-year anniversary of the incident that happened during the riot in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Rittenhouse’s defenders slammed the post for ignoring that Rittenhouse had been through a highly publicized trial and judged as acting in self-defense against his attackers that day.

The progressive group posted, "Three years ago today, at a protest of the police shooting of Jacob Blake in Kenosha, WI, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse—who was openly carrying an AR-15-style rifle—shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, and wounded another man. Rittenhouse was not held accountable."

In a subsequent post, the group linked to an article from a gun control activist site noting that armed assemblies have a propensity to turn violent. In a caption for the post, Moms Demand Action added, "Since then, armed demonstrations—largely driven by far-right mobilization and reactions to left-wing activism—have continued. A study by @Everytown found that armed demonstrations are violent or destructive six times more often than unarmed demonstrations."

The claim that Rittenhouse didn’t receive justice for his actions outraged conservatives on the social media platform.

Townhall senior writer Julio Rosas, who was reporting at the Kenosha riots when they happened, amended the gun control group’s post. Stating, "Fixed your misleading post," Rosas shared an updated image of it marked up with edits in red.

Rosas version read, "Three years ago today, at a BLM riot of the justified police shooting of Jacob Blake, WI, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse—who was openly carrying an AR-15-style rifle—shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, and wounded another man in self-defense. Rittenhouse was found not guilty in a court by a jury."

Medical research and conservative X user Forest Garner responded to the post, stating, "He was held accountable. There was a trial and everything. It was in the news. The verdict based on the actual evidence was that he was not guilty of any crime."

Pro-Second Amendment account "Texas Gun Rights" replied to Moms Demand Action, saying, "Cope and seethe."

Conservative X user Justine added, "Yes the jury ruled that it’s acceptable to shoot people trying to lynch you."

After a multitude of angry replies hit the original post, Moms Demand Action turned off the ability for general users on the site to comment on it, only allowing accounts it follows or mentioned in the post to reply.
 
Of course we have a lot of people here who want those rules ignored when convenient to do so. It's a miracle it's held up as much.
I'm sure TPTB had discussions about the case at the time and decided they couldn't pull a Derek Chauvin on Rittenhouse without risking serious levels of death and destruction. Telling the citizens of the most heavily armed country in the world that self defense is no longer a right they have would not have gone well. If regardless of the facts of your case, you're going to be found guilty of transgressing against innocent and pure crustpunk troon attackers, you might as well kill them if there's any threat at all.
 
notice how they conveniently leave out the third guy, Grosskreutz, had a gun himself and admitted to pointing at kyle
i hadn't paid that much attention to the build up of the trial because like a lot of people i had a lot of other things on my mind when it happened. it blew my mind when i watched the trial and i learned that

- Gaige Grosskreutz feigned a surrender and then tried to shoot Kyle in the head after he lowered his rifle in turn

- the footage of that happening, as well as the whole incident in general, had been available like almost immediately after the shooting happened (IIRC)

and then even after Grosskreutz admitted that's what happened on the stand news companies still ran with the "but the protestor only tried to shoot Kyle because he was afraid for his life" angle

if Kyle hadn't reacted so quickly and shot back he would be dead right now by the hand of a coward. seeing that trial in real time changed my mind about quite a few things
 
gun control groups are always some of the biggest liars out there.

notice how they conveniently leave out the third guy, Grosskreutz, had a gun himself and admitted to pointing at kyle. somehow that gun wasnt a bad gun, unlike kyle's.

mom's demand action can go fuck themselves, nothing but a bunch of lying sniveling busybody mom's who cant stand that people have control over their own lives.
The founder lives in San Francisco as well, of all places.
 
IMG_0638.jpeg
On the plus side, having the opposition literally consist of “concerned moms” pretty much guarantees that the youth will be averse to them.
 
Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty in a court of law, Moms Demand Action should cope and seethe.
Spacebattlers been arguing semantics that Kyle isn't "innocent" but is guilty of murder but the court and jury rule him not guilty of it. I'm surprised Moms Demand Action and other gun control groups still haven't yet got to that level of semantic fuck-fuck gaming.

I'm sure TPTB had discussions about the case at the time and decided they couldn't pull a Derek Chauvin on Rittenhouse without risking serious levels of death and destruction. Telling the citizens of the most heavily armed country in the world that self defense is no longer a right they have would not have gone well. If regardless of the facts of your case, you're going to be found guilty of transgressing against innocent and pure crustpunk troon attackers, you might as well kill them if there's any threat at all.
TPTB got Daniel Perry to remove the right of self-defense. And seeing how nobody who isn't some flavor of Marxist causing zero serious levels of death and destruction over his verdict.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
In a subsequent post, the group linked to an article from a gun control activist site noting that armed assemblies have a propensity to turn violent.
Even if this is true (and I don't believe it, but if it is) I have to blame the people who decide to attack someone who is openly armed. Especially if there's a group of armed people, if you openly engage in hostilities with them, you're either looking to die, or are too stupid to keep breathing; and whatever happens, happens, and I can't shed a tear for you. I'd also like to point out how dozens of cities burned over retarded joggers getting ventilated, mostly without the aid of guns. If guns really were the problem you want to portray them as, Minneapolis should've lost a quarter of its total fucking population when Floyd went down.

you would think mothers would be happy some dude ventilated a pedo
Two pedos.
 
Just looking at the magazine; is that a 9mm or 22lr? I mean, it doesn't matter, but seriously mad over that? Careful, a kid might shoot down a G.I. Joe toy helicopter.
It's a Ruger, so I'd bet it's a 10/22.

Mom demand Action founder scaremongering over a bolt action rifle:
Wyświetl załącznik 5295711
"Founder", more like designated astroturf representative. How many anti-gun NGOs does Bloomberg own exactly?
 
After all the 2A wins we've been getting in courts of all levels recently, then seeing Moms Demand Action BTFO'd like this? It makes my black little heart fly!
 
Of course there's Double Jeopardy, they just get the Feds to file charges if you get off at the state level, or vice versa. Plus the civil lawsuits designed to punish and impoverish you. That's not officially violations of your protections against final jeopardy, but there you have it.
I'm sure TPTB had discussions about the case at the time and decided they couldn't pull a Derek Chauvin on Rittenhouse without risking serious levels of death and destruction. Telling the citizens of the most heavily armed country in the world that self defense is no longer a right they have would not have gone well. If regardless of the facts of your case, you're going to be found guilty of transgressing against innocent and pure crustpunk troon attackers, you might as well kill them if there's any threat at all.
Fat piece of shit Nadler wanted the DOJ to prosecute Rittenhouse after his aquittal.
 
Fat piece of shit Nadler wanted the DOJ to prosecute Rittenhouse after his aquittal.
DOJ said they were going to go after Chauvin if the court didn't convict him. I don't think they even care that they're mask off anymore.
The Civil Rights Act has been nothing but an anchor around the neck of the country. Do anything wrong and the feds can warp it into a "depriving someone of their rights" and congratulations, you're now a felon. They didn't go after Chauvin, they got Chauvin for that exact thing; depriving Floyd of his rights, because suddenly part of policing isn't to grab people and put them in a cage if they're found in violation of a law.
 
notice how they conveniently leave out the third guy, Grosskreutz, had a gun himself and admitted to pointing at kyle. somehow that gun wasnt a bad gun, unlike kyle's.
Leftists are terrified of legal guns in the hands of responsible owners, but they're 100% okay with illegally-possessed or carried guns in the hands of recidivist criminals.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole