Cassandra Clare
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 9 Lip 2023
I feel like people on both sides of this are really missing the point, and I said this in my earlier post, but AI voices ARE NOT the same as AI "art"She's still going.
Wyświetl załącznik 5278558Wyświetl załącznik 5278559Wyświetl załącznik 5278560Wyświetl załącznik 5278574Wyświetl załącznik 5278576Wyświetl załącznik 5278562Wyświetl załącznik 5278563Wyświetl załącznik 5278564Wyświetl załącznik 5278565Wyświetl załącznik 5278566Wyświetl załącznik 5278567Wyświetl załącznik 5278568Wyświetl załącznik 5278569Wyświetl załącznik 5278570Wyświetl załącznik 5278571Wyświetl załącznik 5278572Wyświetl załącznik 5278573Wyświetl załącznik 5278574
As an aside, archive.today is only saving the tweet itself instead of the replies for context, so I would try to archive every tweet just in case.
These artists and animators are basing the ethics of AI voices with their fears of AI "art", and when you put it like that: Oh no!!! Indie creators are using AI to voice their works, what next?? Big corporations? Oh the humanity!! Now art is truly dead and creativity is gone!
Trust, AI voices won't be replacing real people any time soon. If they want to fight the good fight they should make a list of companies who have fired artists and directors to replace them with AI (one comes to mind, Rayark recently fired 90% of their art team and generated AI images for their new character).
And ugh. Again with Viv's holier-than-thou attitude and that sass. Really reminds me of that time some Scottish TERF slighted a trans person on the internet and boomers and zoomers crossed paths for the first time.
So much of that arguing was JUST like this. "Oh bet he's a boomer who talks about the good ol days" or Viv's "lol cope harder" crap. Stop trying to impress your posse and engage in a debate without sass and using internet slang words. It's fucking embarrassing.