hat tip to
@Ralphamaniac
Wyświetl załącznik 5057036
this picture is what throws the whole torswats angle into uncertainty, in my opinion. i don't read or care about OnAforums so i only know that this joke has come up in this lolcow thread. it makes no sense that the torswats guy would accuse fatrick of attempting to defame his local PD, sue them, and pay quasi off with whatever money he potentially won from it unless it's super fucking gay ops coming from inside the farms, because i certainly don't believe he was looking for a patsy.
disclaimer: i also don't use telegram but since it has
t.me . 12m there i think this is from the torswats guy? feel free to label me dumb and stupid if this wasn't torswats guy posting it. but if it was, then i stand by my point that we're back to square one.
i also echo other users in the last ten+ pages (and myself from before that): it would be very easy to prove or disprove Patrick S. Tomlinson's culpability with transaction history from either side. in my experience, this is where all the ragebaiting comes to a head, as was most recently the case with the GTA6 leaks - someone allegedly possesses critical material that'll cause massive ructions if released, teases releasing it... and
never fucking releases it. then we're all left wilting blue-balled once the faggot successfully extracts their narcissistic supply from all the drama they roused.
the torswats fag needs to dump transaction histories, or the MPD needs to bring Patrick in, obtain all his financial records, and settle the matter. there's no excuse for either not happening at this stage.