Culture Have More Sex Please

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Ishtar
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia


By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
you're either lying or a eunuch
idk I was on SSRIs throughout high school and that shit can make you eunuch like. I had a girlfriend tell me 'you need to think with your dick' and some of the shit Red Pill motherfuckers talk about is kind of right wrt how people act or what they want.

In retrospect I have to give this article a lot more credit, if only because it sparked so much discussion despite being so vapid. Very predictable that its devolved into nothing but the usual suspects getting baited by the other usual suspects, though
I know, nobody clicks these threads but everybody knows what they are, its like 5 people and 2 of them are like 'lol just get laid incels Ill fuck literally anyone but you' and the religious mfs going 'shut your fucking mouth and your legs you worthless trollop we need god to give us meaning in life to be happy', the round and round is kind of funny.



I think its easier to chill out about it if you realize men and women are pretty much almost the same when it comes to needs wants and desires around sex and relationships and how they work, but its like heads and tails, just different perspectives and I suppose 'roles' sort of.

I think people outside of men in this instance are having the amount of sex they want, people do turn to porn and like masturbation I guess, as well as some thing like there are plenty of women who will have a lot of attention on tinder and hook up but still say they feel lonely, women worry more about keeping in touch with friends and have more--there is a sort of bias inherent with the people used in the studies here.

Overall I do think its mostly a 'whats the point' at some point thing, its globalism and the rat experiment thing, more government and social justice wont fix it, and saying religion would is just doing the same thing as calling on government and ordinances or whatever.

I think its always been a u shaped curve based on whether or not youre down with 'wandering' or 'shop[ping around' so to speak and it just used to be covered up, its extremes on one end here and then tinder has now allowed extremes on the other, I think I read the average amount of sex partners people had was around 13-15 ish and even when they studied it years ago, the average amount partners both men and women wanted you to have was around 7-9.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I would add they literally defend and praise guys like Andrew tate . For real and then they have shocked pickachy face when women decided to go cat lady route. I mean shit on women for anything, demean them, pump and dump them and then they are suprised when women are like lol no thanks bro.
Scrotes gonna scrote
Literally only the most retarded out of touch men find Andrew Tate as anythong but a punchline to a joke. When he got arrested, I saw more dudes laugh at hom and unironically praise Greta Thunberg for mocking his dumb ass then praise hom. That should be an indication you have no idea how any man but the most brutish and idotic ones operate. That shouls also be an indicatiom that most men are normal and frankly most women are normal too, but the current zeitgeist of casual sex , porn and general hypersexualization of the populace without a focus on actual relationship building and reproduction is not normal and is causing normal people to do stupid shit.
 
I love the juxtaposition of these two articles.
The Wisconsin woman who made global headlines after being accused of the particularly gruesome meth-fueled decapitation of her lover one year ago attacked her own defense lawyer in court Tuesday when the judge in the case suggested a trial delay was necessary.

Based on the allegations against his 25-year-old client Taylor Schabusiness, Green Bay defense lawyer Quinn Jolly must have known that he did not sign up for an easy case. But he may not have anticipated his client would one day try to put his face on the receiving end of her fist.

Local news cameras were rolling when Schabusiness lashed out. Judge Thomas J. Walsh had, against his own preferences, reached the conclusion that the scheduled March 6 trial likely had to be moved back to May 15 at the earliest, FOX 6 reported. Schabusiness did not like that, and she apparently blamed her lawyer.

The handcuffed defendant suddenly lunged at Jolly and engaged in a brief struggle with him before a stunned law enforcement officer in the courtroom took her down to the ground and attempted to restrain her.
careful. they're going to start spamming your notifications. GET REKT LIBTARD
Wyświetl załącznik 4541314
I suspect we are dealing with someone that is male.
Literally only the most retarded out of touch men find Andrew Tate as anythong but a punchline to a joke. When he got arrested, I saw more dudes laugh at hom and unironically praise Greta Thunberg for mocking his dumb ass then praise hom. That should be an indication you have no idea how any man but the most brutish and idotic ones operate. That shouls also be an indicatiom that most men are normal and frankly most women are normal too, but the current zeitgeist of casual sex , porn and general hypersexualization of the populace without a focus on actual relationship building and reproduction is not normal and is causing normal people to do stupid shit.
He’s appealing to young men for whatever reason.
 
Andrew Tate is an actual pimp and you shouldn't listen to him about any form of relationships.
 
This guy is deranged.
Screenshot_1.png
Screenshot_3.png
 
Perhaps we should get rid of the notion of marital consent and make wives the property of their husbands again. It would be one way to reverse some of the damage of the past century. Women should be legally obligated to submit to the will of their husband on command. This would make marriage desirable, and if we got rid of divorce and marital rape laws-marriage rates would sore as men would be incentivized to marry again.
How many lonely divorced men are there? How many miserable men have wives that are de facto room mates? If you want more sex-then make it happen more often in marriage. Men's mental well being would improve drastically if we did what I suggested.
How about you try improving yourself first before jumping to putting White women in breeding camps. Also how does putting White women in breeding camps against their will save the White race?

It's annoying, isn't it? I keep getting the "oh, you've decided to stay single? lol MGTOW" thing.
The phrase MGTOW is rather broad when you think about it, let's say I stay in for the day and play vidya. I've gone my own way and I didn't need to bitch about women to do it. Anything that a guy does is technically a man going his own way it's the reasons will be different but it's the same process really
 
How about you try improving yourself first before jumping to putting White women in breeding camps. Also how does putting White women in breeding camps against their will save the White race?
Very simple: It produces more Whites, that can lead struggle against non Whites in the ongoing racial war. Every White man can invent, work, or fight, is a tool, same with White women producing more workers, soldiers and scholars/scientists.

Racial conflict reduced to the basics is a struggle for resources and comes down to will to win and sheer numbers.
 
Uh, I'm an extremely mediocre middle-class dude of no relevance or note.


Because my account is a joke about confusing Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, you oblivious retard. You're the only person on this entire site who didn't immediately get it.
Especially considering there’s a user here named @Ben Affleck with Matt Damon’s face on it. Went over his head.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole