TranssexuaLiam - Assigned Male's genderbent cousin

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I wonder are trannies triggered by Liam's artwork as well as cis people

Here's one vote for yes.

Although I'm not as bothered by the plot as most people, I think cause I don't have the instinctive packer=dildo thing, which admittedly, if you're not used to it and don't know how bad lower dysphoria can get is a really fucking weird thing to do, just shoving a rubber dick in your pants.
 
It's not triggering; I just find it oddly disturbing that the author has a creepy fixation with children's genitals.
You can't use packers as dildos, by the way. They're not made for that kind of use.
 
Something about the art style makes me feel physically ill. Nothing serious, just a little queasy. There's just something about it that's gross to me.

Because this shit is totally by the same dude who made Moon Over June.

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/screen-shot-2016-05-02-at-11-36-39-am-png.90703/

Demfaces_moonoverjune.png


The expressions don't lie.
 
I gotta say it, it looks to me like whoever draws this comic asked LaBelle for art tips. Between the linework (moreso the brush that looks a bit like a calligraphy brush), nightmarish facial expressions, weird ears and anatomy in general.... yeah....
 
A packer and a dildo are different. A packer is for alleviating bottom dysphoria (dysphoria about one's genitalia). Dildos are for fucking. It always bothers me a bit whenever the topic comes up, because dealing with dysphoria and the creepy fetishists are two entirely different things. All the tumblrtard bullshit conflates the two, which doesn't help.

However, kids not yet at puberty and who don't have severe bottom dysphoria don't necessarily need a packer, which makes the comic creepy as fuck, more than the art style already makes it. Reminds me of the creepy fetishists who jizz themselves over the idea of trans children.
 
Now, I don't know for sure, but I don't imagine that a packer that is as big as one's entire lower body is the most effective way to alleviate this "bottom dysphoria."
 
I.... I dunno. The art style is.... "different?" I don't want to say it's worse than Assigned Male because, let's face it, the art of AM is complete shit. And it's less condescending than Sophie, too. It's just kinda weird. Like a tranny Ren and Stimpy or something.

The artist keeps framing the strips like they're Youtube videos and he keeps saying "Follow me on youtube." Is there a youtube channel for these cartoons? I'd like to see that.
 
A packer and a dildo are different. A packer is for alleviating bottom dysphoria (dysphoria about one's genitalia). Dildos are for fucking. It always bothers me a bit whenever the topic comes up, because dealing with dysphoria and the creepy fetishists are two entirely different things. All the tumblrtard bullshit conflates the two, which doesn't help.

However, kids not yet at puberty and who don't have severe bottom dysphoria don't necessarily need a packer, which makes the comic creepy as fuck, more than the art style already makes it. Reminds me of the creepy fetishists who jizz themselves over the idea of tranny children.

It doesn't matter what it's for. At the end of the day that strip is about a child stuffing a giant rubber cock down his jeans.
 
Why are artworks pieces of turd they call artwork aimed at the tumblr crowd always so fucking ugly?

I get it - their bodies are too healthy for normal clothing and tents are edgier, wearing a proper bra only reinforces the partiarchy and all decent looking people in the world are photoshopped anyway. But why the hell have all these comics to be ugly on purpose (and why the hell do the creators even fail at executing this stylistic choice properly?)? Is their self-esteem that low? Does ths style help conveying a message that I just don't understand because I'm too priviledged? Is this supposed to come off as quirky?

Could somebody enlighten me? I really want to know.
 
Why are artworks pieces of turd they call artwork aimed at the tumblr crowd always so fucking ugly?

I get it - their bodies are too healthy for normal clothing and tents are edgier, wearing a proper bra only reinforces the partiarchy and all decent looking people in the world are photoshopped anyway. But why the hell have all these comics to be ugly on purpose (and why the hell do the creators even fail at executing this stylistic choice properly?)? Is their self-esteem that low? Does ths style help conveying a message that I just don't understand because I'm too priviledged? Is this supposed to come off as quirky?

Could somebody enlighten me? I really want to know.
Because the tumblr crowd will literally look for any excuse to accuse them of something horrible. Character drawn thin? "You hate fat people!" Character shown in a hetro relationship? "You hate transexuals!" Character drawn too pretty? "Unrealistic beauty standards/You're a sexist pig!" I guarantee no matter how a character is drawn or what they're drawn doing, someone somewhere on tumblr will find it "problematic" and throw you to the wolves.
 
Why are artworks pieces of turd they call artwork aimed at the tumblr crowd always so fucking ugly?

I get it - their bodies are too healthy for normal clothing and tents are edgier, wearing a proper bra only reinforces the partiarchy and all decent looking people in the world are photoshopped anyway. But why the hell have all these comics to be ugly on purpose (and why the hell do the creators even fail at executing this stylistic choice properly?)? Is their self-esteem that low? Does ths style help conveying a message that I just don't understand because I'm too priviledged? Is this supposed to come off as quirky?

Could somebody enlighten me? I really want to know.
Sometimes I think it's an earnest response to the same design choices in mainstream media, but they don't seem to know how to go against the norm while still making their art appealing to look at.

At least in this case. I am of the opinion that the female version of this comic, Sophie Labelle, just sucks at art.
 
Because the tumblr crowd will literally look for any excuse to accuse them of something horrible. Character drawn thin? "You hate fat people!" Character shown in a hetro relationship? "You hate transexuals!" Character drawn too pretty? "Unrealistic beauty standards/You're a sexist pig!" I guarantee no matter how a character is drawn or what they're drawn doing, someone somewhere on tumblr will find it "problematic" and throw you to the wolves.

That actually makes sense to me.

Sometimes I think it's an earnest response to the same design choices in mainstream media, but they don't seem to know how to go against the norm while still making their art appealing to look at.

At least in this case. I am of the opinion that the female version of this comic, Sophie Labelle, just sucks at art.

All of this "art" looks the same to me, so it seems like their backlash against the evil mainstream media is not successful after all. But then again, I'm not the target audience.
 
All of this "art" looks the same to me, so it seems like their backlash against the evil mainstream media is not successful after all. But then again, I'm not the target audience.

Technically in regards to the sameness, this is mostly due in part to the fact that a lot of Tumblr artists are 'self-taught', which really means they all copy off each other instead of starting with fundamentals and then branching out into stylistic choices. They jump straight to stylistic. So it's all just basically the same flavor of shit dressed up slightly differently.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole