💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[ThisHill2DieOn]

Got my internet back and got around to downloading Legal Mindset's YT chats for his noseguard stream. xlsx format. Haven't had time to read them myself, so not sure what if anything juicy is in there. Except Uncivil Law chatting "Andrew is loyal " at 02:20:49, right before the stream closes.

Anyways, enjoy.

 

[AnOminous]

"I don't watch or care about any of this KF shit. Also, I saw where Josh said..."

lmao

We should have one of those timers for how many days it's been since Nick told us, yet again, how much he doesn't care.

I still don't get where this "people are mad at him" shit comes from. He just went from a guy we laugh with to a guy we laugh at.

It's one of the lolcow copes that they give you, word for word, when you turn into a lolcow, because every single lolcow claims exactly this, that people are mad at them for shitting their pants in public and drooling like a retard, instead of just laughing at a retard.

I mentioned this before; lots of times the person who you think would be great in a D&D game often winds up being the worst.

I was usually a GM. I wasn't particularly strong as a player, at least in a sustained campaign.

Spoiler: rpg sperging

My one skill was being an obnoxious, annoying pest. I think my most obnoxious character was a lawful neutral wizard who was a stuck-up, obnoxious prig. Lawful neutral meaning all the moralfagging of a paladin but without the moral part. And he talked like a fag too.

Anyway, my one skill meant that my main playing was as a temporary guest player doing the kind of character who would usually be an NPC but needed more fleshing out, often someone who had a critical role to play at some point in the adventure (so they couldn't just kill me) and usually an incredibly annoying prick who would do everything to try to sucker the other characters into killing him.

I had one character who was the stereotypical chaotic neutral fuckwit but knew where the stash was that was the point of the expedition. Within a few minutes I had everyone hating me so much they wanted to torture the information out of me, but the paladin who was the party leader refused. I taunted the paladin relentlessly every time he did his usual lawful goody two-shoes bullshit. Due to cleverness on the part of the players, there was an encounter with another actual NPC who also knew the location, and they tricked him into blurting it out.

Everyone looked at me and I knew what was coming. "We don't need this guy any more, do we?" And I taunted the paladin one last time. "That wouldn't be very good, would it. Would [your deity] like that?" And he rolled a 20 and chopped off my head on the spot with his handy vorpy and said "I'll repent tomorrow." And we all laughed.

But you can see how this kind of behavior would not really work out in terms of a prolonged campaign. It would get really old. It's okay when it's in small doses and when it's actually with the approval of the GM and of the group.

tl;dr GMs do not necessarily make good players. Often rather the opposite.

 

[Captain Manning]

Love that nervous laugh. He's really trying.
So it basically boils down to - 'I will listen to advice unless it's coming from a detractor'? Solid argument. Dig in those heels, Nick. Dig them in and never let go.

There's a solid case to be made for not listening to alogs. That is to say, people who hate your guts.

However, not everybody who is criticizing Rekieta can be labeled an alog.

I'm particularly sure Null isn't alogging Rekieta. Compare and contrast everything Null has said about Rekieta to... I dunno... Kinochet, for example. One he wants to stop acting stupid, and the other he wants to do a kickflip off a bridge because they are so stupid they're probably beyond redemption.

Nick just can't take the criticism, and doesn't want to acknowledge it might be valid. This will not end well.

 

[AnOminous]

There's a solid case to be made for not listening to alogs. That is to say, people who hate your guts.

There's a solid case to be made for listening to people who hate your guts and are attacking you, if only to know what avenues of attack they are using. If they inadvertently say things that are actually true that you can use to improve yourself, all the better.

 

[Procrastinhater]

I still don't get where this "people are mad at him" shit comes from. He just went from a guy we laugh with to a guy we laugh at. The only people I've seen getting mad are the ones that feel like we somehow turned on Nick (Locals chat). Frankly, I don't give a shit what Nick does. I don't enjoy his content now that he shifted formats so I don't watch him anymore. Coming here to laugh at the idea of him shoving his balls inside another human being is a source of joy.

Exactly. I've lost a content creator that used to make legal content that was entertaining and funny but gained a lolcow that talks about reaming his wife with ball dildos and has a community of desperate old slatterns that post hilariously bad titty pics, so its not even a loss, more like a lateral move.
I liked funny legal videos but I like laughing at retards just as much if not more. The only people I can see that are mad are the leathery old tiddy posters and their simps that are getting mad at being called out and laughed at for being ridiculous.

someone who really doesn't know you, is generally regarded as a loudmouth idiot and someone nobody in the general public takes serious and you don't really suffer from the accusation....not per se.

I wonder if all this Balldo shit and publically turning into a drunken coom brained deviant is a 4D Chess move by Rackets to render himself defamation proof...

 

[Anticipointment]

Aren’t….aren’t all chaps assless?

Exactly. Which leads one to wonder, did Drex mean Nick was wearing chaps without pants underneath? Perhaps he was wearing them with one of Kayla’s thongs? Did Drex witness this, was he shown a photo, or only heard about it? The mind boggles at all the horrifying possibilities.

 

[Strix454]

Exactly. Which leads one to wonder, did Drex mean Nick was wearing chaps without pants underneath? Perhaps he was wearing them with one of Kayla’s thongs? Did Drex witness this, was he shown a photo, or only heard about it? The mind boggles at all the horrifying possibilities.

Yeah. Any dude that has a conversation with another dude about wearing chaps with their ass exposed is almost certainly grooming the other guy for a life-changing experience.
When he passes you the molly, don't take it Drex.

 

[Not Who You Think]

Exactly. Which leads one to wonder, did Drex mean Nick was wearing chaps without pants underneath? Perhaps he was wearing them with one of Kayla’s thongs? Did Drex witness this, was he shown a photo, or only heard about it? The mind boggles at all the horrifying possibilities.

Assless chaps because Nick has no ass.

 

[feral cat #6385]

Exactly. I've lost a content creator that used to make legal content that was entertaining and funny but gained a lolcow that talks about reaming his wife with ball dildos and has a community of desperate old slatterns that post hilariously bad titty pics, so its not even a loss, more like a lateral move.
I liked funny legal videos but I like laughing at retards just as much if not more. The only people I can see that are mad are the leathery old tiddy posters and their simps that are getting mad at being called out and laughed at for being ridiculous.

I am thankful for the heel turn. My sleep schedule is a lot better now.

 

[Swole McPole]

The problem with the tests proposed in most courts is that they are very subjective and they allow the legal system quite a bit of flexibility to decide subjectively if calling someone a pedo is per se defamation or not. It allows the judge to use their spider-sense to determine what the intent of the person was. That is how the law officially works in the light of day.

Practically speaking behind the scenes, it seems to often come down informally (not as a matter of official law) to:

a) How much damage was done to the person by the accusation
b) Was the person making the accusation going to be accepted as credible in saying what they said.

That makes much more sense to me. I knew that your courts were much more liberal about constitutes defamation than ours are, but it seemed unlikely to me that you could publicly accuse somebody of being a paedophile and always, in all circumstances have the courts say 'Oh, that's just opinion. No harm, no foul.' Which is the line Rekeita seems to be taking, and that Kosher Salt seemed to be affirming.
You seem to be saying, 'well, it depends' -- and that's true here in the UK too. There's a list of 'points of guidance' to help the court decide whether a defamatory statement is opinion or fact.

1. “The statement must be recognizable as fact, as distinct from an imputation of fact.
2. Opinion is something which is or can reasonably be inferred to be a deduction, inference, conclusion, criticism, remark, observation etc.
3. The ultimate question is how the word would strike the ordinary reasonable reader. The subject matter and context of the words may be an important indicator of whether they are fact or opinion.
4. Some statements which are, by their nature and appearance opinion, are nevertheless treated as statements of fact where, for instance, the opinion implies that the claimant has done something but does not indicate what that something is, i.e. the statement is a bare comment.
5. Whether an allegation that someone has acted “dishonestly” or “criminally” is an allegation of fact or expression of opinion will very much depend upon context. There is no fixed rule that a statement that someone has been dishonest must be treated as an allegation of fact.”

So not that different to the USA after all. I mentioned earlier that my wife was a lawyer. Her view was that you really should do anything you possibly can to avoid getting involved in litigation. It's massively stressful, phenomenally expensive and can drag on for years. Unlike Nick, she actually practiced law for thirty-odd years, so she knows what she's talking about. She'd regard his willingness to let this actually go forward ratther than attempting to settle it as hard evidence of his lolcow status -- even if she wouldn't quite use that term.

 

[AnOminous]

I wonder if all this Balldo shit and publically turning into a drunken coom brained deviant is a 4D Chess move by Rackets to render himself defamation proof...

"Defamation-proof" generally doesn't work in the other direction. You can't really claim you're such an absolute retard that absolutely nobody would believe what you say because you're only known as a completely retarded piece of shit.

If there is such a defense, Nick doesn't qualify for it. He actually has credibility at least in a certain sphere.

 

[Strix454]

.I mentioned earlier that my wife was a lawyer. Her view was that you really should do anything you possibly can to avoid getting involved in litigation. It's massively stressful, phenomenally expensive and can drag on for years. Unlike Nick, she actually practiced law for thirty-odd years, so she knows what she's talking about. She'd regard his willingness to let this actually go forward ratther than attempting to settle it as hard evidence of his lolcow status -- even if she wouldn't quite use that term.

I agree with your wife's view. Its best to avoid litigation whenever possible and to exit litigation in the most financially efficient way possible (including settlement). Ruthless cost-benefit analysis of the litigation is absolutely necessary at every step.
The most foolish thing Nick is engaged in is trying to turn his own legal problems into content for his streams. He shouldn't be commenting about his own case. Especially commenting on other lawyers involved in the case or the judge. Even more so than usual because of the ongoing professional disciplinary investigation into his conduct.

 

[Phony Chicken]

lol wut
Meanwhile, Nick's chat asks every guest the balls or no balls question.

Also CGoody saying he never talks to a child in a "negative way" is a really weird thing to say given the context that he was in a private group with a 12 year old or whatever. What the fuck does he mean by that? A pedo's definition of talking to a child in a "negative way" would be different than a non-pedo, for you know, a totatly random example.

 

[Captain Manning]

New Elissa clip. Who here likes Thomas the Tank Engine?

Watch it all the way though. It's great.

lol wut

Fat women!

The joke is he likes fat women. We call him Dear Feeder.

Christ almighty, do these people know nothing of Kiwi Farms culture?

 

[Potatoherder]

The most foolish thing Nick is engaged in is trying to turn his own legal problems into content for his streams.

Honestly it may have paid off if he didn't decided to speedrun being a lolcow. He was riding high off of getting unbanned and everyone stood behind him. Him starting a gofundme only started to raise eyebrows after his cuckmobile purchase and a solid month bragging about how much he made. People like to help the little guy but Nick clearly isn't one anymore.

Also, Seems the Kyle interview is happening the 24th:

Rekieta Law (@RekietaLaw)

Jan 24th at 11pm central.

nitter.1d4.us

 

[Phony Chicken]

New Elissa clip. Who here likes Thomas the Tank Engine?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=oePhdkZUvxg
Watch it all the way though. It's great.

lol she's getting better at this. Love it.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

New Elissa clip. Who here likes Thomas the Tank Engine?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=oePhdkZUvxg
Watch it all the way though. It's great.


Fat women!

The joke is he likes fat women. We call him Dear Feeder.

Christ almighty, do these people know nothing of Kiwi Farms culture?

Absolutely killer video, Elissa nailed it. Can't wait to see chat reeing about how she is making money off of the "private" locals chat and how stuff is being taken out of context again.

 

[Maude Snew]

Absolutely killer video, Elissa nailed it. Can't wait to see chat reeing about how she is making money off of the "private" locals chat and how stuff is being taken out of context again.

He should try shitting himself on stream, I hear that makes a lot of money for content creators.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

He has exactly 777 subscribers. It's a sign. He is Our Nosetradamus.

I checked out his two most recent videos, the first from December and the second from yesterday. I felt he earned the chance for me to listen to him gloat about being right about Nick.

This guy gets like 100 views tops on his videos and in the first one below he claimed that Drex has appeared in his comment section to noseguard.

That said, I take severe issue with his characterization as the Montagraph lawsuit as a "legit lawsuit". Severe issue. That's a terrible take.

New Elissa clip. Who here likes Thomas the Tank Engine?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=oePhdkZUvxg
Watch it all the way though. It's great.

I have to say, I give legitimate props to Nick for not throwing Null under the bus even though it might seem convenient for him to scapegoat him at this time. Good for him.

On the other hand, Elissa seems to have gone full mask-off as a detractor now, based on the end of that clip.

Honestly it may have paid off if he didn't decided to speedrun being a lolcow. He was riding high off of getting unbanned and everyone stood behind him. Him starting a gofundme only started to raise eyebrows after his cuckmobile purchase and a solid month bragging about how much he made. People like to help the little guy but Nick clearly isn't one anymore.

Also, Seems the Kyle interview is happening the 24th:
Wyświetl załącznik 4288728

Rekieta Law (@RekietaLaw)

Jan 24th at 11pm central.

nitter.1d4.us

Congrats to Nick, I thought this wouldn't happen at this point. Though I find it odd that a week out he's only promoting it in a reply to a 5-day-old Tweet and holding it on a normal Tuesday night show. But whatever, it's a big win for him. Hopefully he can go one night without sex or drug talk.

 

[Lady Rackets Ass]

Honestly it may have paid off if he didn't decided to speedrun being a lolcow. He was riding high off of getting unbanned and everyone stood behind him. Him starting a gofundme only started to raise eyebrows after his cuckmobile purchase and a solid month bragging about how much he made. People like to help the little guy but Nick clearly isn't one anymore.

Also, Seems the Kyle interview is happening the 24th:
Wyświetl załącznik 4288728

Rekieta Law (@RekietaLaw)

Jan 24th at 11pm central.

nitter.1d4.us

Rate me optimistic but if that actually happens I will probably tune in