🐱 ‘There’s no hope for men’: TikToker says female co-worker is talking to 39 guys on Hinge, sparking debate

CatParty

While “love is blind” may be a common reality show-producing mantra, the reality of online dating today seems set to prove love is anything but sightless.

Apps like Tinder and Bumble employ a swipe system in which users are presented with a photo and scant information about their potential partner, allowing them the option to quickly select “yes” or “no” with just the flick of a finger.

As these apps become ubiquitous, more people are realizing the imbalances that they produce. For example, a 2016 study found that, while men on Tinder accumulate likes slowly, women can rapidly match with many people. To that end, by the study’s conclusion, the seven fake male profiles researchers created had received a total of 532 matches; the number for the fake female profiles was 8,248.

The findings of this study seem to be backed up by a recent viral TikTok from user Jeremy (@lilyanddahhboosh).

In the video, which now boasts over 69,000 views, Jeremy asks his co-worker about her matches on the dating app Hinge. After only two days of being on the app, she is allegedly talking with almost 40 people.

Jeremy’s surprise in the video is obvious.

“Do you realize for guys we have to wait, like, weeks to get likes, let alone a person that we are interested in to send us a ‘like’…[or,] when we send them a ‘like,’ for them to accept it?” Jeremy asks his co-worker. “We’re, like, shooting a basketball in the dark, blindfolded, backwards, and hoping that it lands in a goal that’s almost smaller than the actual ball.”

In the comments, some users agreed with this notion.

“I sat with my guy friend and we did a 5 minute bumble swipe where we had to swipe on everyone,” recalled a user. “I got 55 matches he got 2. It’s so rough for guys.”

“I had over 4,000 likes in 6 days,” claimed another. “Got overwhelmed…and didn’t proceed.”

However, others pointed out that quantity does not equal quality.

“From those 39 only like 2 are good,” a viewer stated.

“Tell me why half the men don’t respond then when they liked you first then you accept and start a convo,” a second user questioned.

“But it’s exhausting,” another user wrote. “From 39 none will be able to follow through with consistent communication!”

The findings of the 2016 study seem to back up this claim. In the study, while women did receive more matches than men, they were also better instigators and communicators.

“Overall, we find that 21% of female matches send a message, whereas only 7% of male matches send a message,” the study reads. “Thus, women who match with us are 3 times more engaged than men.”

Jeremy later posted an update on his co-worker’s progress.

In summary, she has now whittled the number of men she’s talking to down to 17.

In the comments, Jeremy clarifies that this series shouldn’t be taken to say that men are completely hopeless in the modern dating world.

Responding to a commenter saying they were unsure of how to proceed knowing that their match is talking to many other people, he simply wrote, “Not all women are doing that. Just be yourself and if she doesn’t like it. Then let her go, king. Don’t change yourself for someone else.”
 
Who cares? Fuck them hoes and move on. I made a tinder for shits and giggles just to waste their time while visiting a friend in a city, and got quite a few matches, just to troll them. Gotta learn to market yourself.
 
1659815584041.png

I wish I could find the account that posted this, because I bet the pfp is completely out-of-line with her apparent expectations.
 
In all likelihood, that will just increase frustration towards women until you take up porn again or find a woman. While I can see the added motivation factoring into your chances, it also may lead to you fucking up, coming off as the sex starved man you will literally be.
To be honest, unless you have low energy and pass out after work or have no free time, I agree with staying off dating apps. Sure you can find a real girl every now and then, but most of the ladies there are literally either cheating on someone (boyfriend/husband/etc.) or trying to find a way out of making mistakes. (I have 4 children pay for them subhuman) Also yeah, porn is bad because it makes your brain less receptive to trying to earn your pleasures, and can lead to sexual dysfunction or deviancy if consoomed to much.


When you approach think of it like talking within your friend group. Tell jokes, act as you normally are. No holding your breath, no being shy (ok so talk to them like a friend you might want to have sex with). The best thing to do is if you get rejected instead of getting frustrated keep yourself in an emotionally neutral area, the same as if your friend said he couldn't come hang for some festivities. Have a slight disappointment and continue on as if nothing happened. Some women will actually come back upon seeing their rejection didn't effect you. There are some who will openly apologize about rejecting you weirdly enough then open the door for you.

In regards to wasted money, a good technique that usually mitigates that is by having the women invest into the dates by paying for something or bringing something along. Weird comparison but like the people who threw money into scientology, the more you have someone invest in dates or relationships with you the more likely they are to stay.

One key thing many men don't do also when talking to the woman in question is pay attention to body language. It's easy for many women to give away how attracted they are. Facing away, licking their lips, broad stare.

Also don't feel bad about the fuck ups, that leads to experience, which is necessary to do better in the next time. Also some women actually like sex starved men, as weird as that sounds, some women will even temporarily get into a sexual relationship just to help morale boost less charismatic men. Those lady often feel damaged and never end up in a serious relationship due to traumas, which is unfortunate.

Personally, I myself knew one of the "top 20%" the most special girl in my life myself, so I know they exist despite harping on women a lot. If it wasn't for her bad health and her pushing me to other women I would have already been out of the dating pool, because it's a shitstye. If you find one of the 20%, and you don't have a misfortune of fate, don't ever let her go.
 
There's all sorts of people who use dating apps that I can have empathy for. I think the one type of person I don't understand being there is pregnant women. If pregnant women actually have a lot of success on dating apps then I'm baffled.
 
we are witnessing several generations of women be absolutely trash
you can try and say not all women the same way we say not all men but hilariously it is actually most women in this scenario rather than a subset of sex-obsessed men in power
So about that 100 dates chart. I have a few questions with no actual answer to receive since the dude is anonymous, but when I look at it, it feels like some things were left out, which skews the bias.

1a. Of those who put out on the first date, was it the woman or the guy who initiated it? There's a chart saying that the first move was initiated by 62 women, and he initiated to 38 women. Well what was the “first move”, was that for the kiss on the first date (41 women) or was it for the sex? And were any of those first moves further reciprocated, or were there rejections? Were those who rejected it "dropped" after the first date?
1b. Of the 16 women he sexed up on the first date, who was the instigator? 24 women wanted sex on the first date, but did he go through with any of those women? Implying he banged 16 of those 24 women, why was it that he turned down the other eight?​
1c. Did any of the 17 dates who got drunk have drunken sex with him, or no?​
1d. Vast majority of his dates were single mothers, but were any of those who put out the ones who talked politics, mentioned bad exes, had no time to date, or did they not make any kind of bitching comments at all?​
1e. What did half of them actually talk about that wasn't mentioned for the first date conversations? Were they just too mundane or too normal to mention? How many of those conversations overlapped with how many women?​
1f. Were any of his dates the ones who had “NO HOOKUPS” on their profiles, or did he not date any of those “NO HOOKUPS” matches?​

2. Are the medical problems most of them talked about serious medical problems that could be a deal-breaker to dates, or just “woman problems” that was passed off as medical?

3. The nine women who weren't on their phones on the first date, did he go on to date them a few more times, or no? There were nine women who had about seven-or-so dates with them, were those them, or was it a hodgepodge? Which of the women were the most “acceptable” or the “exception” to go on multiple dates with. Were any of them part of the given stats on the chart?

4. Why were 18 women wearing heels to the first date such a big deal to note? Is that really a bad thing?
 
This, and specifically we're now seeing the first generation of guys who went through school being explicitly told that they're worthless and irredeemably evil. If they don't shoot up a mall, they certainly aren't going to college or getting jobs, are doped up on SSRIs and/or atomic-grade legal cannabis, not able to leave the house, and rightfully are not optimistic about their future.

We're starting to see stories like that come out.

son.jpg
 
We're starting to see stories like that come out.

Wyświetl załącznik 3571098
Yeah, and the bouncer's story earlier in the thread is totally legit. There's no hope, you're all right, and sex isn't worth this kind of stress.
 
Shit really is rough out there for young guys. I was at a party the other weekend, and this young guy - 23 or so - was telling me a story of a date he went on recently. Apparently they headed back to her place, where her housemates were there and sat in the living room. As he was walking to her room with her (and I'm fuzzy on the order of events he told me) he noticed a black-pen mark on the doorframe of her bedroom door, allegedly marking 6 foot.

Apparently her housemates laughed and shook their heads, and his date asked him to leave - because he was below the line.

I don't know how true any of it really was - but for young guys to have to contend with that level of treatment, as well as the constant fear of what that kid in the Daily Mail article went through... I honestly don't get how they cope.

Thank fuck I'm old.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 3570284
Dude on the left ain't bad looking, but when she gets to stand beside the rich and famous guy, the difference in expression are stark.
I had an ex who's mom had that same expression on her wedding picture. The dad was happy as a pig in shit with a full head of hair and a mustache. At the time I was dating my ex, the dad was bald and miserable, and after spending a few days at my ex's place i could see why. Mother was NEVER happy unless she was out with her friends and/or it was football season but as soon as she came home she made EVERYONE's lives miserable by bitching, moaning, and complaining.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Shit really is rough out there for young guys. I was at a party the other weekend, and this young guy - 23 or so - was telling me a story of a date he went on recently. Apparently they headed back to her place, where her housemates were there and sat in the living room. As he was walking to her room with her (and I'm fuzzy on the order of events he told me) he noticed a black-pen mark on the doorframe of her bedroom door, allegedly marking 6 foot.

Apparently her housemates laughed and shook their heads, and his date asked him to leave - because he was below the line.
Manlets BTFO.
 
Christ this is atrocious. I honestly feel like 1 in 2 male zoomers are gonna die incels because of how things are.
 
We have to get it into people's heads that sex is a LONG way from the most important thing in life and is incredibly overrated unless it's with your soulmate.
 
You get what you deserve if you think you're getting anything with quality and longevity on a dating app. Nobody using them has good prospects because the swiping and matching is the dopamine they get from scrolling Facebook and they don't think further than that. People with stuff going on worth knowing are not on dating apps, and they have good social circles to pull well adjusted people from if they are ruthless in their values.

There's retarded entitlement on both sides that will never be satisfied by interaction on a dating app, and the combined speed and rate of rejection by people you think are beneath you only fuel resentment and avoidance of responsibility in choosing better ways to meet people. Everybody knows this and they still keep these apps on their phone and bitch about their self imposed dilemma. You may find someone good online but the vast majority don't for aforementioned reasons.
 
Half of the users if not more would just have the word Nigger in their bio and that includes myself.

Miscegenation is an affront to the Lord.
An exception will be given to Orientals who must send a 23andme report in their proposition.

No woman above the age of 26 please, I don't want your barren womb.

NIGGER.NIGGER.NIGGER.NIGGER.NIGGER.NIGGER.NIGGER.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole