martinfinnegan / Sarah Anne / "Sander Safe Space" - obsessive Bioshock fan with a delusional streak

[Tokitae]

I'm not managing to find those callout posts for @Takotsubo5, but I did stumble on a bunch of posts Sarah wrote about her family. Here's a post she wrote about her mom. Her tag from tentacle-twat also has a post about her mom yelling at her. Also, uh, how old is her sister, because this post makes her look like she's at least 10, but then this post makes her seem a lot younger. Also apparently her sister knows about the whole Sander Cohen thing.

Also, found another one of her URLs. And her Bioshock blog.

I'd be willing to bet the latter two sister posts were just staged for notes and attention, realistically. Loads of people do that; see: every [insert popular fandom] according to my mum/grandpa/sister/dog/etc. post ever.

Um... I'd weigh in on the norrington situation but I guess all that can be said has been said. Look, man, I really don't want to antagonise you, since it seems like you came here with good intentions and I don't really want to slam you for wanting to protect someone you see as vulnerable, but like... at this point can't you see that things have only ramped up since you came along to try and fix things? You don't seem like a bad person, but you really aren't helping your case or your friend's by sucking people into arguments here (or being sucked in yourself). I really think it would be better to just take a step back, or take it to PM with the people you have beef with... otherwise you are just adding fuel to the fire you supposedly came to put out.

And of course, the last thing you want is to end up with a thread yourself. That's happened before and I'm sure will happen again, but I personally don't think it is worth it just to defend a person you're only kind of friends with on the internet. Still, it will likely be your choice how things ultimately play out here.

 

[Doc Smith]

It kind of seems like you're reaching for reasons not to buy @Takotsubo5's side of it at this point, @norrington. A lot of the questions you asked were pretty damn specific, and you had the benefit of looking up the answers recently rather than recalling them from years ago. And given how many times these two account jumped, I don't blame her for not remembering each and every detail.

I'd be willing to bet the latter two sister posts were just staged for notes and attention, realistically. Loads of people do that; see: every [insert popular fandom] according to my mum/grandpa/sister/dog/etc. post ever.

I thought so, too, which is why I linked them. I'm finding more and more posts that seem like they were faked for notes, which lends credence to the idea this is a running theme with Sarah.

 

[3-DAWG]

And of course, the last thing you want is to end up with a thread yourself. That's happened before

im reading through that the now and the people started a annoyed, but r getting ore and more harsh with sheep cause she just keeps adding more fuel to the fire, i'm not trying to be an asshole but do u want that @norrington? <:/ theres peeps here that r already annoyed with u and if u keep just coming back with more massive walls of text ppl r gonna get more harsh with u

 

[Whiskey Foxtrot]

Yeah, but couldn't you say that about like, 90% of this site though? I mean, depending on your perspective. Like, obviously at least other users get something out of most of the rest of the posts and all (humor?) but is it really that bizarre?

Being skeptical about the authenticity of someone who claims to have personally known a lolcow isn't bizarre.

Caring enough to write thousands of words about it, conduct interrogations, devote a considerable amount of your personal time on it, and continue to shit up the thread despite everyone else waving their hands and going "no, stahp" is.

 

[norrington]

@Tokitae I don't have a beef with anyone who hasn't come in trying to flame me, and even then, the only thing I've done is responded to their attempt and then dropped it. I don't care enough about personal attacks to bother keeping after somebody for calling me stupid or a bad writer or gay for martinfinnegan or whatever else. I care about this account either verifying themselves in the same way any other account on this site is verified as a lolcow (i.e. live message on an account with clear, provable connection to the thread's subject), or being acknowledged as a fake and their remarks being acknowledged for what they are, which is just bullshit.

@Doc Smith, I've demonstrated they have 2 livejournal accounts that are still activated and should be accessible if she is who she says she is. Even if she forgot the password for both of those accounts, I sincerely doubt they've forgotten the email they used to sign up with all these accounts, url-switching or not. I've also pointed out that nearly all of the more valid aspects of their stories here can be found on archives of the ex-gf's old deviantart account, which I've also demonstrated they've likely been pulling information from since their first claim.

@Whiskey Foxtrot Proving takotsubo is a fake or getting them to prove me wrong concretely has been the point of all this from the start. I made a mistake of being too moralistic about it at the start, and apologized and reiterated my points without the high-horse white knighting, but from that point on, *almost nobody gave a shit about what I was saying until I'd finally gone through exactly what I meant.

At this point, it's just people grilling me personally and defending takotsubo by saying she provided more proof than I have, which I am honest to god just not seeing in any of her posts. I wouldn't have posted here again if it weren't for her and putato talking about already being verified again.

That said, I'm not gonna sit here and act like I'm not bizarre. But that doesn't mean I'm wrong, either.

*EDIT: some people gave some shits.

 

[BaraChan]

@norrington I'm impressed you've been trying to defend your ass and Sarah's puss vag and continuously denying Takotsubo5's claims that they are Sarah's ex. Honestly you aren't really getting anywhere with this like at all so why do you keep going?

 

[Putato]

@norrington, and if she screenshots being on these LJ accounts, you'd call shoop again. Funny how she needs to jump through YOUR hoops to prove who she is and get verified, despite you not being a mod; thus not calling any shots. I get the feeling that she'd nearly have to dox herself for you to be satisfied.

 

[Trucute]

It's going to take a lot more than an unverified white knight coming into a thread halfway in and stirring up shit that would have died had you left it alone to change opinions. Really how most of us feel at this point is set in stone so you're pretty much fighting a battle you can't win for a person who you're just making things worse for. Just drop it and maybe the thread will die.

 

[3-DAWG]

im gonna go get some eats ya'll, im guessing when i get back norringtons gonna post more massive walls of text and nothing is gonna get progressed, just the same repeated shit.

 

[norrington]

@norrington, and if she screenshots being on these LJ accounts, you'd call shoop again. Funny how she needs to jump through YOUR hoops to prove who she is and get verified, despite you not being a mod; thus not calling any shots. I get the feeling that she'd nearly have to dox herself for you to be satisfied.

They're not my hoops. She's not verified, therefore people should stop acting like what she says carries any weight at all until she is. And the suggestion was to post something on either of those livejournal accounts, as is the usual practice in lolcow verification.

 

[Putato]

They're not my hoops. She's not verified, therefore people should stop acting like what she says carries any weight at all until she is. And the suggestion was to post something on either of those livejournal accounts, as is the usual practice in lolcow verification.

How the hell do you know what goes into lolcow verification? She provided a screenie of her DA. If the mods are fine with it, then it should be fine for the rest of us.
Speaking of, you have yet to verify yourself, so you don't really have much room to talk. You are waiting for an "impartial third party" (good luck getting that), but you alone are the final judge for @Takotsubo5's validity.

 

[Meowthkip]

How the hell do you know what goes into lolcow verification? She provided a screenie of her DA. If the mods are fine with it, then it should be fine for the rest of us.
Speaking of, you have yet to verify yourself, so you don't really have much room to talk. You are waiting for an "impartial third party" (good luck getting that), but you alone are the final judge for @Takotsubo5's validity.

@norrington won't let me verify them because I'm biased. And they aren't.

 

[Putato]

@norrington won't let me verify them because I'm biased. And they aren't.

Oh, shoot. I forgot that @norrington is the most unbiased and moral person to come into this thread. All the other users (including mods) are just a bunch of dang dirty trolls! Perhaps we should make her head mod.

 

[Juscum]

@norrington won't let me verify them because I'm biased. And they aren't.

You? You're the nicest mod on this site. How.

 

[norrington]

How the hell do you know what goes into lolcow verification? She provided a screenie of her DA. If the mods are fine with it, then it should be fine for the rest of us.
Speaking of, you have yet to verify yourself, so you don't really have much room to talk. You are waiting for an "impartial third party" (good luck getting that), but you alone are the final judge for @Takotsubo5's validity.

@norrington won't let me verify them because I'm biased. And they aren't.

Okay. Here's two scenarios for you:
A. Someone posting a new message on a livejournal account that is completely dead and has been for years (which applies to both of those accounts) and doesn't link back to their current social media accounts in any way, shape, or form
B. Someone giving out their current, active tumblr information either publicly on a thread being watched by people who seem increasingly desperate to take me down a notch or twelve, or to someone who's been teetering on the edge of vindictiveness throughout this thread.

You're right. I smell a double standard. Call the equality police.

 

[Juscum]

teetering on the edge of vindictiveness

Citation needed, please.

 

[Putato]

Okay. Here's two scenarios for you:
A. Someone posting a new message on a livejournal account that is completely dead and has been for years (which applies to both of those accounts) and doesn't link back to their current social media accounts in any way, shape, or form
B. Someone giving out their current, active tumblr information either publicly on a thread being watched by people who seem increasingly desperate to take me down a notch or twelve, or to someone who's been teetering on the edge of vindictiveness throughout this thread.

You're right. I smell a double standard. Call the equality police.

A: If they haven't been on for years, then it's plausible they don't remember their password. As @Takotsubo5 has shown, they have a tendency to account hop and probably aren't retarded enough to use the same password over and over.
B: Come off it. We all know even if she does that, you'd throw a bitch fit that she never mentions Sarah or her past.

I do hope you aren't in law school. You'd make a rubbish lawyer. (And you obviously skive off lessons to defend the honour of Maid Sarah.)

 

[Trucute]

You do realize most of your problems right now would be solved if you just let the moderator who offered to verify you do so instead of flinging shit at a person who doesn't meet your standards of verification despite being a new user who doesn't know how this forum works right? They offered a form of identification unlike yourself who keeps spouting the same bullshit and stamping your feet that it doesn't meet your tumblr callout post standards. We don't need to fucking dox the person just know who they are which so far you have done nothing of the sort.

 

[norrington]

A: If they haven't been on for years, then it's plausible they don't remember their password. As @Takotsubo5 has shown, they have a tendency to account hop and probably aren't retarded enough to use the same password over and over.
B: Come off it. We all know even if she does that, you'd throw a bitch fit that she never mentions Sarah or her past.

I do hope you aren't in law school. You'd make a rubbish lawyer. (And you obviously skive off lessons to defend the honor of Maid Sarah.)

Spoiler: except this part where I'm the one linking the ex to those accounts

@Takotsubo5, let me give you another hand here: "your" old livejournal is still active. (link) They don't post there any more, there's nothing tying it to anybody's newer accounts wherever ex gf is now, so if you're her, it should be no issue for you to post proof that you're who you say you are there. It looks like it was made around the same time as your deviantart account so presumably you either still remember the password for it, too, or you know the email you could get a password reset from.

EDIT: Alternatively, you could change the password on that deviantart to something innocuous/impersonal (e.g. 123456 or 'password') and let us know so we could see for ourselves that you have access to the deactivated account, since there's no way to reactivate a deviantart after it's been deactivated for 30 days.

EDIT #2: I found another older livejournal ex-gf said was theirs on an old twitter account. If you can't access that first one, maybe you can still remember the log-in for this one: (http://mrsmustang.livejournal.com).

and, you know, explaining why they should be very likely to have access to one or the other.

 

[Putato]

and, you know, explaining why they should be very likely to have access to one or the other.

Or perhaps like a lot of people do (including myself) she has different accounts with different passwords linked to different emails. Not everyone is moronic enough to use the same password for everything. (Though I can infer from this that you are.)