martinfinnegan / Sarah Anne / "Sander Safe Space" - obsessive Bioshock fan with a delusional streak

[norrington]

Sorry, I had crashed into a slumber for a bit. Gramma Meowthkip needed a nap.

I'm quoting all these posts to give you a sense of how many goddamned words you've written. Look at them. Look at all those goddamned words.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: A guy named William Shakesman once said "Brevity is the soul of wit." That just means don't waste my time. So, who are you to Sarah? A mutual? She ask you to do this, or did she guilt you into it by just showing you links and complaining, being all like "oh, if only SOMEONE could go in and tell these Kiwis how wrong they are! I'm not asking you, of course. I just wish someone would!"

I feel like I should challenge you to keep your posts to like, 140 characters or something, or have you answer in the form of a haiku, so maybe you'll learn to keep things nice and simple instead of needlessly complicating this with your noisy bullshit.

Are you kidding? This is the most interesting this thread has been in a while. I mean, it's fuckin' TL;DR because @norrington seems to think she's like James Joyce or William Faulkner or some shit, but hey, it's conflict.

I know, yeah. As I said, I'm a bad writer. I was a mutual of theirs, like I said (but I get it, you know, as much shit as I've posted, like, some info's gonna slip through the cracks, no disrespect). I don't know where they are, I found this thread looking for them. I'm assuming they're okay since they apparently tried a couple of url changes and alt accounts/twitter, and have presumably just cut ties with all former followers to start fresh since there have been quite a few people claiming to be former friends/mutuals/etc. I can't fault her for that, but I also definitely am not in contact with her at all and wouldn't have any better idea how to go about finding her than you guys would.

Spoiler: off-topic re: faulkner-joyce

If we're gonna go with one of the two, I'd personally opt Joyce instead of Faulkner (do I get a vote?), since at least Joyce's stuff was so completely disconnected from reality it couldn't even like, claim to pretentiousness on its own behalf. Later audiences had to do that for it to make it seem like they both read and had the balls to say they understood what the fuck was going on.

Faulkner did some alright shit, too, and realistically, I'm probably as much of a massive whiny-ass pissbaby as he is, even if I'd prefer Joyce I could see it being the stronger comparison of the two. I dunno. Both are probably fair to mockingly compare me to (as a wannabe faulkner/joyce, of course). I swear I'm not that fucking full of myself to make that comparison seriously, no matter how much I write. It's more a (figuratively speaking) compulsive thing than some kind of you-all-should-be-so-thankful-as-to-read-my-many-words-of-wisdom thing. But don't take my word for it.

Could I throw Hugo's hat into the ring? He was as wordy, but less abstract/absurdist and way more preachy/moralistic, so it might fit? Just a thought.

 

[Meowthkip]

I know, yeah. As I said, I'm a bad writer. I was a mutual of theirs, like I said (but I get it, you know, as much shit as I've posted, like, some info's gonna slip through the cracks, no disrespect). I don't know where they are, I found this thread looking for them. I'm assuming they're okay since they apparently tried a couple of url changes and alt accounts/twitter, and have presumably just cut ties with all former followers to start fresh since there have been quite a few people claiming to be former friends/mutuals/etc. I can't fault her for that, but I also definitely am not in contact with her at all and wouldn't have any better idea how to go about finding her than you guys would.

If you're a bad writer, maybe you should git gud.

Spoiler: off-topic re: faulkner-joyce

If we're gonna go with one of the two, I'd personally opt Joyce instead of Faulkner (do I get a vote?), since at least Joyce's stuff was so completely disconnected from reality it couldn't even like, claim to pretentiousness on its own behalf. Later audiences had to do that for it to make it seem like they both read and had the balls to say they understood what the fuck was going on.

Faulkner did some alright shit, too, and realistically, I'm probably as much of a massive whiny-ass pissbaby as he is, even if I'd prefer Joyce I could see it being the stronger comparison of the two. I dunno. Both are probably fair to mockingly compare me to (as a wannabe faulkner/joyce, of course). I swear I'm not that fucking full of myself to make that comparison seriously, no matter how much I write. It's more a (figuratively speaking) compulsive thing than some kind of you-all-should-be-so-thankful-as-to-read-my-many-words-of-wisdom thing. But don't take my word for it.

Could I throw Hugo's hat into the ring? He was as wordy, but less abstract/absurdist and way more preachy/moralistic, so it might fit? Just a thought.

Nobody cares. Nobody asked.

 

[norrington]

If you're a bad writer, maybe you should git gud.



Nobody cares. Nobody asked.

I'm trying.

 

[lesboslut69]

I followed this kid (and hasn't the whole point of this forum being how mentally/psychologically immature she is? Regardless, I say kid mainly because I've followed her that long; sorry if that's misleading, though)

Well, we've cleared up any confusion here now, I should hope.

She's not a kid, and because she is not a kid, she should be held accountable for her actions. See: lying to people with a far-fetched story about being gang raped, a laundry list of disorders... I could go on.

Spoiler: off-topic re: faulkner-joyce

To clarify, since you seem to need everything broken down: we're saying you're full of hot air.

I'm assuming they're okay since they apparently tried a couple of url changes and alt accounts/twitter, and have presumably just cut ties with all former followers to start fresh since there have been quite a few people claiming to be former friends/mutuals/etc.

Which are, of course, the actions of someone with nothing to hide, right? You'd think if none of this were true she'd say something. But instead, she's put everything on lockdown. You'd think if any of her claims held water, she'd try and defend them.

 

[Meowthkip]

I'm trying.

Now you're getting it.

 

[Pancake]

It's like compiling a file on somebody with all their personal information, where they work, go to school, who they interact with and what they do in their free time, maybe following them sometimes and then making sure you do all that conspicuously enough that it'll get back to them, and then when somebody calls you on it you say "yeah but I've never spoken to them so it's not like I'm /harassing/ them? calm down lol" like.

It's nothing like that at all, because you're forgetting Tumblr is available to the public. It's not some locked down little safety nest of hugs and rainbows. Why does everyone forget that?

 

[Melkor]

If you post it publically, everyone will see it--even future employers. That's why you separate RL from online and you don't fucking tell people every detail of your life.

 

[norrington]

It's nothing like that at all, because you're forgetting Tumblr is available to the public. It's not some locked down little safety nest of hugs and rainbows. Why does everyone forget that?

I haven't forgotten anything. I'm perfectly aware of all this. Just because I agree with you that it's stupid doesn't make it okay to go digging it up. They're not putting in an application to work for you guys. You've got no reason and no valid or verified justification (e.g. them being a piece of human garbage like your other subjects) to go digging into this person's life other than to harass them. You did it because some other tumblrina hiding behind anon because they knew the person sicced you on them.

If you post it publically, everyone will see it--even future employers. That's why you separate RL from online and you don't fucking tell people every detail of your life.

If a place of employment where I've put in an application finds out all the companies I've worked at and schools I've attended and whatever the fuck else, that's normal. If some random asshole I don't know at all finds all this shit, and goes about it in a way that he knows I'm gonna know he's doing it, that'd be fucking creepy.

Again, if it were some person being a massive piece of shit to people or encouraging toxic shit like proana or whatever the fuck else, I'd understand. I also assume I wouldn't've been following them in the first place. I'm just asking why you buy that this person's worth their own personal lolcow thread since your 'proof' of her fake rape claims doesn't hold water, far as I can tell. She wasn't broadcasting this shit. Yeah, it was posted online, yeah, that's stupid, but she wasn't promoing or advertising or any of that shit.

Also, what the fuck would you all think a person should do in this scenario? They've had their P.O. box, full name, presumably their hometown, old instagram pictures, all doxxed. So, what, they just sit on their ass and do nothing? Leave up all the personal info you guys are saying it's so fucking stupid to post in the first place? Maybe it was a good lesson for her in the end, but that's not how you convince other members here to not do dumb shit like that; you just fucking tell them like a normal person. I don't see the evidence that she deserved this doxxing pseudo-harassment shitfest in the same way others might have, according to your own standards as best I've been able to gauge them.

But that goes back to the original question, the reason I'm here, "white knighting" aside, which is whether or not you have some actual evidence to back up your justifications for all this. But it's already been said you don't. I know that. I know I should be done. I dunno why I'm not. We all know I'm a dumbass though, that's been well-established.

 

[dykesquad]

They've had their P.O. box, full name, presumably their hometown, old instagram pictures, all doxxed.

Wrong-o. Sairnder doxxed herself. @Whiskey Foxtrot posted some stuff pertaining this on the actual first fucking page, but hey, I get it--too busy being special to do any backreading, right champ?

At any rate, straight from the cow herself: reasons to donate to her, followed by her address (not pictured, since she's gone on full lockdown).

Spoiler: Posting your address online is worth it as long as people send you Biomerch

 

[norrington]

Wrong-o. Sairnder doxxed herself. @Whiskey Foxtrot posted some stuff pertaining this on the actual first fucking page, but hey, I get it--too busy being special to do any backreading, right champ?

At any rate, straight from the cow herself: reasons to donate to her, followed by her address (not pictured, since she's gone on full lockdown).

Spoiler: Posting your address online is worth it as long as people send you Biomerch

Again.
Stupid? yes. Incredibly so.
Immature? Irrational? Definitely.
Merits posting on a forum and getting thousands more views and accompanying off-site harassment? In my opinion, not so much. But. "White knighting," forum guidelines, "she-was-asking-for-it" debate, whatever.

Anyway. It's been mostly fun, honestly. This last bit, not so much, but maybe that's just because I've gotten tired. Either way, I'm off for a while. Maybe for good (if only, right?) if I come to my senses and grasp the fact that I'm talking to a brick wall of self-affirmation that rivals tumblr itself. Wouldn't've started with this if I'd thought that were the case initially, but we've established how gullible, childish, spergy and generally moronic I am. So... Thanks for humoring me, I guess? Kind of?

I'll probably check back later, who the fuck am I kidding.

Sweet dreams, guys.

 

[& Knuckles]

who cares

Your dedication to trying to win an internet fight surely merits something, but it ain't respect.

 

[nasty blast from the past]

I'll probably check back later, who the fuck am I kidding.

Make sure you got them titpics when you do, bb.

 

[Juscum]

Make sure you got them titpics when you do, bb.

OT: Didn't "she" call herself a "college man"? God, I hope not. Seeing Dynastia's dick was enough for me.

On topic:

off-site harassment?

As far as I know, no one has showed up at her place to throw eggs and tell her to stop playing vidya. Citation needed.

 

[lesboslut69]

Okay, is it just me, or did Pagan's tumblr bio say something about dating Sarah?

Spoiler: Trouble in paradise?

Spoiler: On the other hand, she still has Fontaine and Cohen smooching on her sidebar.

 

[Whiskey Foxtrot]

I think that if this was Sairnder or Pagan then we'd be getting more batshit gibberish than spergy essays.

it just seems kind of like, distinctly gross of you all.

This needs to go in random text.

 

[dykesquad]

Not sure if Pagan is either in drastic lack of self-awareness (likely!) or if these posts are about Sairnder. Going off @lesboslut69 's theory, it certainly looks like cracks are starting to show.

Spoiler: THE VAGUEPOSTZZ

 

[norrington]

Alright, look. My first reaction to this site was mild revulsion, then I read some of your stuff, read more about the people you guys went after, read how users usually introduce a lolcow--generally with trepidation, especially if it's their first one or a new, unestablished lolcow; e.g. 'does this merit a thread? what do you guys think?' etc. Read through a few of them.

The people who got the most hate and the most attention were genuinely, verified completely full of shit about all their shit, were hiding behind fake-ass claims to oppression, were usually doing something disgusting on top of all that (thinly-disguised proana/mia shit encouraging others to take up dangerous, disordered behavior, encouraging/romanticizing self-harm, repeated confirmed-fake public 'suicide attempts/threats', or just straight up racist/antisemitic/homophobic/transphobic/etc).

There were some one-off people who might not have deserved it but who also usually didn't get the full, all-out treatment, who got a couple posts or pages mocked for their content but didn't get every part of their online life dredged up and made fun of for having endometriosis and scrutinized for how "legit" it seemed with no evidence to the contrary.

You guys keep insisting I care about her as if that proves I have some close personal relationship with her; I care about her, as much as I'd care about any person in her situation, dealing with the mental and physical issues she does, as I believe she genuinely is, because I've read this shit you guys think is so fucking bizarro for years. Some of you suggested she was fake-trans. And yeah, I doubt they were gonna go get HRT or seek out GRS, but I don't doubt they were experiencing some types of serious psychological distress bad enough that they could mistake it for a type of gender dysphoria--beyond that, they didn't respond to hate they got like 'uwu don't attack me ur just being transphobic!!1' which would have been fucking disgusting.

The only time I've ever heard of her bringing up her 'issues' in online fights was when she was being harassed by people defending untagged nsfw noncon incest and/or underage fanfic/fanart in the tags; ill-advised, possibly talking-out-of-her-ass powerleveling to prove a point against somebody coming after you for not shipping their incest otp? Yeah. Does that powerleveling, true or not, merit her getting her own personal lolcow thread and having her entire life deemed gross and bizarre by you guys? Fucking no. By your own goddamn standards.

It's not about white knighting, it's not about morals, it's about this forum apparently genuinely wanting to stay above getting sucked into petty personal vendettas disguised as lolcows by an anonymous OP, and me saying that's, apparently, full of shit. It's a low quality thread with low quality content on its own, and many have said on this thread that it wouldn't be remarkable on its own if their choice of kintype or whatever the fuck you call it wasn't sort of "bizarre" in its own right because it was Sander Cohen.

I'm not either of them. I never followed pagan (I'm pretty sure I followed martinfinnegan before the two of them ever met/started following each other). I'm not close to them. Hell, 'verify' me however the fuck you do that if you still want to keep insisting like I'm just one of them.

TL;DR - I'm telling you I think you're off-mark on this one. I'm trying to do it within the scope of your own community guidelines, pointing out how it's off by your own fucking standards. From the start, I've said this shit seemed gross of you guys to do, it seemed fucking out of character. From the response I've gotten, I've realized that's probably not the case.

That's really all I've got to say about it. Have fun shitting on the quality of my writing and calling me a liar and asking for my tits, and I'll keep being the only one getting off-topic marks in this thread for responses to your off-topic questions that got 'win's and 'greats' or whatever the fuck. And yet this place supposedly more than just a doxproof tumblr-knockoff self-affirming circlejerk soundboard. I should've known better than to seriously think that at one point.

EDIT: Figured a quick redact was in order, since I've realized by this point it's mostly just a handful of you here on the tumblr subforum that are this goddamn annoying.

 

[Juscum]

doxproof tumblr-knockoff self-affirming circlejerk soundboard

Can someone translate this into English for me?

 

[Hanamura]

Alright, look. My first reaction to this site was mild revulsion, then I read some of your stuff, read more about the people you guys went after, read how users usually introduce a lolcow--generally with trepidation, especially if it's their first one or a new, unestablished lolcow; e.g. 'does this merit a thread? what do you guys think?' etc. Read through a few of them.

The people who got the most hate and the most attention were genuinely, verified completely full of shit about all their shit, were hiding behind fake-ass claims to oppression, were usually doing something disgusting on top of all that (thinly-disguised proana/mia shit encouraging others to take up dangerous, disordered behavior, encouraging/romanticizing self-harm, repeated confirmed-fake public 'suicide attempts/threats', or just straight up racist/antisemitic/homophobic/transphobic/etc).

There were some one-off people who might not have deserved it but who also usually didn't get the full, all-out treatment, who got a couple posts or pages mocked for their content but didn't get every part of their online life dredged up and made fun of for having endometriosis and scrutinized for how "legit" it seemed with no evidence to the contrary.

You guys keep insisting I care about her as if that proves I have some close personal relationship with her; I care about her, as much as I'd care about any person in her situation, dealing with the mental and physical issues she does, as I believe she genuinely is, because I've read this shit you guys think is so fucking bizarro for years. Some of you suggested she was fake-trans. And yeah, I doubt they were gonna go get HRT or seek out GRS, but I don't doubt they were experiencing some types of serious psychological distress bad enough that they could mistake it for a type of gender dysphoria--beyond that, they didn't respond to hate they got like 'uwu don't attack me ur just being transphobic!!1' which would have been fucking disgusting.

The only time I've ever heard of her bringing up her 'issues' in online fights was when she was being harassed by people defending untagged nsfw noncon incest and/or underage fanfic/fanart in the tags; ill-advised, possibly talking-out-of-her-ass powerleveling to prove a point against somebody coming after you for not shipping their incest otp? Yeah. Does that powerleveling, true or not, merit her getting her own personal lolcow thread and having her entire life deemed gross and bizarre by you guys? Fucking no. By your own goddamn standards.

It's not about white knighting, it's not about morals, it's about this forum apparently genuinely wanting to stay above getting sucked into petty personal vendettas disguised as lolcows by an anonymous OP, and me saying that's, apparently, full of shit. It's a low quality thread with low quality content on its own, and many have said on this thread that it wouldn't be remarkable on its own if their choice of kintype or whatever the fuck you call it wasn't sort of "bizarre" in its own right because it was Sander Cohen.

I'm not either of them. I never followed pagan (I'm pretty sure I followed martinfinnegan before the two of them ever met/started following each other). I'm not close to them. Hell, 'verify' me however the fuck you do that if you still want to keep insisting like I'm just one of them.

TL;DR - I'm telling you I think you're off-mark on this one. I'm trying to do it within the scope of your own community guidelines, pointing out how it's off by your own fucking standards. From the start, I've said this shit seemed gross of you guys to do, it seemed fucking out of character. From the response I've gotten, I've realized that's probably not the case.

That's really all I've got to say about it. Have fun shitting on the quality of my writing and calling me a liar and asking for my tits, and I'll keep being t only one getting off-topic marks in this thread for responses to your off-topic questions that got 'win's and 'greats' or whatever the fuck. And yet this place supposedly more than just a doxproof tumblr-knockoff self-affirming circlejerk soundboard. I should've known better than to seriously think that at one point.

where the tits tho

 

[nasty blast from the past]

And yet this place supposedly more than just a doxproof tumblr-knockoff self-affirming circlejerk soundboard.

New random.txt?