Religious & Morality Spergging of the Catboy Covenant - Debate the most autistic points of Nick & Friends ethics and morality

[Easterling]

Religous zealotry in current year to the extreme that these people take it is unironically an incel cope, Its the sort of shit that kids with a relgious upbringing latch onto once they learn about the crusades/inquistion. The difference is most edgy teens grow out of that shit, look back and cringe and move on with thier lives, go clubbing make friends and try not to judge others quite so harshly on experiences they themselves have not had. I find a lot of people like this use piety as a crutch for not participating in normal behaviour through being autisitc or socially stunted in some form. Its their only way of not feeling inferior to thier peers.

 

[Gondola Enjoyer]

I genuinely have no clue how the alt-right grift went from "fucking cuckservatives aren't hardcore enough and christcucks are just slaves to jews" to "CHRIST IS KANG, PRAISE GOD".

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Dude didn't even know who Spartacus was. How can one claim to truly know Christianity without a knowledge of Roman history?

What the heck does Spartacus have to do with Jesus?

 

[Tacitus Kilgore]

Some of you might be familiar with Andrew Anglin the Daily Stormer and maybe his Gaymer Uprising forum. They do this Christian zealot routine all the time. He did it recently when crypto crashed. I find it to be really cringey. They say retarded religious based shit over there at Gaymer Uprising all the time. There are a few of them that even said dinosaurs are fake. They seem to have gone for a young earth type of thing. Dem dinosaurs iz all fake an shiiiiiieeeeeeet. When they don't say stupid shit like that they are doing a Christian schizo act where they say everything is demonic or a demon. It's hilarious shit.

In this link Anglin is doing his best Christian doom splain routine.

https://gameruprising.to/index.php?threads/war-is-coming.39469/

 

[Bioniclelover]

Religous zealotry in current year to the extreme that these people take it is unironically an incel cope, Its the sort of shit that kids with a relgious upbringing latch onto once they learn about the crusades/inquistion. The difference is most edgy teens grow out of that shit, look back and cringe and move on with thier lives, go clubbing make friends and try not to judge others quite so harshly on experiences they themselves have not had. I find a lot of people like this use piety as a crutch for not participating in normal behaviour through being autisitc or socially stunted in some form. Its their only way of not feeling inferior to thier peers.

They are just LARPers, they aren't really zealous or pious. They latch to catholicism like american self-described communists to soviet union or neo-nazis to nazi germany. None of them has any resemblence of actual knowledge about the beliefs they supposedly espouse. It's just a way for them to be part of something bigger and give them sense of belonging and a clear moral compass.

 

[Sanity]

I genuinely have no clue how the alt-right grift went from "fucking cuckservatives aren't hardcore enough and christcucks are just slaves to jews" to "CHRIST IS KANG, PRAISE GOD".

I sometimes feel like it's a psyop to push angry white kids away from ethnonationalism, which is antithetic with being a christian. This way, frustrated young white men can lash out at white women for catharsis, and they don't focus too much on racial demographic problems. Notice how you can get away with extreme misogyny way easier than with racism? Imagine if some political figure, even as anecdotal as catboy Fuentes, said that black people shouldn't have the right to vote, or that they're only good for breeding. You could be sure that he would get sued to death. Everything related to racialism in a way that is beneficial towards whites, is literally satan in our post-WW2 western world. Fuentes and his clique allow frustrated white men to feel "based" in a way that doesn't challenge what the "elites" are pushing, or globohomo if you prefer. These pathetic movements also pit white men and white women against each other, because of their extreme misogyny. It's astonishing to see these retards on telegram unironically thinking that muttboy fuented will save le white civilization or whatever.

I also fail to see how clinging on an agrarian abrahamist faith is going to help anybody sorting out the shit going on in our hypermordern times.

 

[Terra Pax]

I sometimes feel like it's a psyop to push angry white kids away from ethnonationalism, which is antithetic with being a christian. This way, frustrated young white men can lash out at white women for catharsis, and they don't focus too much on racial demographic problems. Notice how you can get away with extreme misogyny way easier than with racism? Imagine if some political figure, even as anecdotal as catboy Fuentes, said that black people shouldn't have the right to vote, or that they're only good for breeding. You could be sure that he would get sued to death. Everything related to racialism in a way that is beneficial towards whites, is literally satan in our post-WW2 western world. Fuentes and his clique allow frustrated white men to feel "based" in a way that doesn't challenge what the "elites" are pushing, or globohomo if you prefer. These pathetic movements also pit white men and white women against each other, because of their extreme misogyny. It's astonishing to see these retards on telegram unironically thinking that muttboy fuented will save le white civilization or whatever.

I also fail to see how clinging on an agrarian abrahamist faith is going to help anybody sorting out the shit going on in our hypermordern times.

There are however many 10s of million of white people in Nick's target age demographic and the number of followers he has is, at best, maybe in the low thousands. Core followers in the hundreds.

Are you involved in any IRL white advocacy movements like AF purports to be? If not why? Is it because you have pressings issues like work or family? Do you want to enjoy your free-time relaxing or doing something fulfilling or constructive? Do you find the idea of wearing some silly costume or making a homemade shield to be really gay? If the answer to any of these is yes then you should know why these movements, AF and all, attract only the worst sorts of people. It's why you don't get John the carpenter or bill the hareware store guy-otherwise normal people. Instead they get Kai the streamer or Jayden the neet or some other insufferable faggot with an insufferable middle-aged white mom name.

No psyop required IMO. In a system of like 300 million people it's perfectly reasonable for a few hundred retards to coalesce around one of them who has slightly more gumption than the others.

 

[Gary the Cryptofascist]

They are just LARPers, they aren't really zealous or pious. They latch to catholicism like american self-described communists to soviet union or neo-nazis to nazi germany. None of them has any resemblence of actual knowledge about the beliefs they supposedly espouse. It's just a way for them to be part of something bigger and give them sense of belonging and a clear moral compass.

Yeah, it is all just fake and gay. Non of them is actually a Christian. Today is the Feast of the Corpus Christi, pretty important solemnity. How many Catboy/AF faggots are actually celebrating this? Or even know what that is or that it is today?

 

[Kung Pow Cream]

So when are they going to do the thing where they realize Catholicism is not actually that based and then they go to Norse Paganism because they think that's more based?

 

[Rosy Reptile]

I genuinely have no clue how the alt-right grift went from "fucking cuckservatives aren't hardcore enough and christcucks are just slaves to jews" to "CHRIST IS KANG, PRAISE GOD".

I sometimes feel like it's a psyop to push angry white kids away from ethnonationalism, which is antithetic with being a christian. This way, frustrated young white men can lash out at white women for catharsis, and they don't focus too much on racial demographic problems. Notice how you can get away with extreme misogyny way easier than with racism? Imagine if some political figure, even as anecdotal as catboy Fuentes, said that black people shouldn't have the right to vote, or that they're only good for breeding. You could be sure that he would get sued to death. Everything related to racialism in a way that is beneficial towards whites, is literally satan in our post-WW2 western world. Fuentes and his clique allow frustrated white men to feel "based" in a way that doesn't challenge what the "elites" are pushing, or globohomo if you prefer. These pathetic movements also pit white men and white women against each other, because of their extreme misogyny. It's astonishing to see these retards on telegram unironically thinking that muttboy fuented will save le white civilization or whatever.

I also fail to see how clinging on an agrarian abrahamist faith is going to help anybody sorting out the shit going on in our hypermordern times.

For some it's a LARP, but for many what alt-righters need to realize is that many of those guys just honestly learned more and just outgrew the alt-right. As it turns out secularism itself is a psyop even bigger and more important than anything having to do with race, and mankind's problem is spiritual first and political second. The "agrarian abrahamist faith" isn't a solution to "hypermodern times", it's just the demonstrable reality of the situation. Asking what good Christianity is for saving the white race is like asking an alt-righter what good the alt-right is for saving video games. It's a question asked by someone who has not been keeping up.

Of course they goofed by going Catholic specifically, but a lot of these guys were cradles or just agnostics new to religion entirely.

 

[Meiwaku]

So when are they going to do the thing where they realize Catholicism is not actually that based and then they go to Norse Paganism because they think that's more based?

The alt right have two flavors. Franssen came from Viking larp to trad cath in the af sphere.

Is this just a western thing? I am also unsure but are all Christians just inherently a bit retarded when it comes to hearing someone else say they're a Christian and then auto believing them? (The god alogging comes later if someone disagrees) I've found this to be true in my personal experience. It takes a lot of religious people too fucking long to figure out someone in their sphere isn't actually as they say they are. Then you get people mixed in who are True & Honest with the Untrue & Dishonest and it makes everyone look like shit. It's why personally I take peoples religion and politics with a grain of salt until they prove they live what they believe.

Also the louder people sperg about being religious, the less I believe it.

 

[Tornado]

The fake religious e-ologians (e.g. Church Militant, InspiringPhilosophy) I hate with passion. In real life people assume Catholicism is just a cultural thing so they are confused when you say that you’re fasting and it isn’t Lent and if they stumble on you praying they act like they caught you jerking off. I don’t mind that sort of interaction as much as the many times I’ve made a comment on the Internet and I have a Protestant / Orthodox guy unburden himself of his pent up rage for Twitter accounts that subtweet him with a mitre-wearing frog avatar.

For my puzzle piece counterpart in the OP: I don’t hate Eastern Orthodoxy but the constant need to try and stunt on Thomists is transparent and stupid, because it practically always comes from a place of ignorance. It’s like if I called hesychasts liars who just want to sell Mount Athos icons. It’s not true and it’s a retarded take divorced from reality. I bet it would piss you off. Same thing happens every day not just from 2-year converts who read a blog post from Kaleb of Atlanta and now hate all things Latin. It happens from Catholics too and way more often since they get absolute basics wrong and do so arrogantly. Glad we have a tard cage to work this out.

 

[Meiwaku]

I think what bothers me the most is the sexism, as Christianity is arguably the one of the nicest moralfagging religion to women. Retarded men have just ruined it or created false morality around purity culture that doesn't have biblical basis.

Genesis 1:27 says god created mankind and womankind in his own image. By virtue of creation they have equal worth and dignity, when Adam and Eve fell into sin that fucked everything up. Despite this, he gave the high honor of birthing Christ to a woman because of her gender not in spite of it. No omegaverse for men, women get to host the body of christ.

Jesus taught women specifically the same as men and women were some of his biggest followers. There are laws that ensure women get fair treatment including widows and single women. He paid equal attention to women who sought him for healing and forgiveness often to the shock of men within that society who were used to a very misogynistic one. A woman saw the first resurrection and women who brought news of the resurrection to the world.

Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus”... this also means that they should probably not be racist or anti-semites as it was Christianity that is what freed the slaves and Jesus was from the long nose tribe.

I've heard one of these faggots doing Ephesians 5:22 in bad faith. "wives are to submit to their husbands “as to the Lord.” out of context this seems sexist. BUT, the very next words command husbands to love their wives “just as Christ loved the church” and to love them “as their own bodies,” providing and "just as christ loves the church" . If you take into consideration that Christ acted as a servant to. The final passage is a mutual submission to one another as partners with reverence for Christ. Jesus' disciples commanded us to do the same —even sacrificing his life for the sake of women in John 13.

The talks of rape/etc. within the bible were often because that's what happened at the time. I think Deuteronomy was the biggest one but a description of something is different from "this is what you should do".

Genesis 3:16 is another that these faggots cite (incorrectly) which is " your desire will be for your husband and he will rule over you". The Hebrew phrase in question does not include a verb and is literally "toward your husband your desire" this "will be" is added to clarify as a future statement. The ongoing clarification from Adam & Eve is that "your desire will be to control your husband but he will rule over you". However, the statement that this will take place is not a biblical command nor is it saying that it is correct, it is saying it will happen. There is no biblical command for men to dominate women nor is there for women to dominate men. There are plenty of things said in the bible that "will" happen that are not good nor are they commands for it to happen.

Only because of equality offered in Christian cultures were many rights afforded to western women. Voting was first an idea gotten from Native American tribes where men and women would equally pick their leaders. The women who lived with these native women and had them speak at their conferences for voting rights fought for equal rights of all women to vote and used the bible as proof of equality to appeal to the western sentiment. Christianity does not have a hate boner for women and it's why things that the maidenless (and ladless) AFers sneed & feed about like Women's Suffrage was supported.

Saying the bible supports misogyny is just as misguided as saying the bible is feminist. If you take the history and people they were talking to in account, it was promoting complimentary parts. Insecure moids have also attempted to bolster misogyny using science, "history", laws of various nations and other preposterous things that are often misleading or downright false (IQ anyone?).

TL;DR- Nick & Tristian & other sneed n feed sexist groys are equal to women in the eyes of their God. Die mad about it.

 

[The First Fag]

Grab your fedoras and jigsaw puzzles because we're about to get autistic.

The thing that bothers me the most about AF's morality and religion sperging is how they use it as both a crutch and as a facade. I may have mentioned this in my analysis of the Metokur vs. Fuentes "debate" but I think that AF is now some kind of gayop to discredit the right. It is painfully obvious that Fuentes is no real leader. Whatever that kept AF from devolving into a faggot cult left with Casey. The way I like to describe AF is with the character of Hannah from Until Dawn. The AF that was and the AF that is are so divorced from each other yet so conjoined at the dick that were it not for my vague understanding of AF from the time I started getting into Metokur's work straight out of high school, I wouldn't believe you if you said that they are the same thing. What was once lovable, adorable and maybe a little autistic is now this disgusting thing wearing the corpse of what was.

When any of these retards go on about moral principles and religious principles, it is so obvious that they are just using it to appear as better than other people and to justify their abhorrent ideals like hating women and looking down upon other racial groups. I'm not really a religious man but even I can tell you that the God I know would tell you that all are equal in His eyes and that all are deserving of His love. Any reasonable Christian or conservative would be able to tell you that this kind of stupid bullshit is not okay. And it is so obvious that they just want to get away with being creepy weirdos and are just looking for a crutch to use. None of these tards obviously believe what they are spouting but they seem to think that it works.

I've said this before and will probably continue saying this until either AF reforms itself (which probably won't happen without Fagentes being thrown off his throne of piss) ot AF is little more than dying embers for me to piss on, but there are some days where I feel genuinely feel ashamed in being in the same general side of the political compass as these retarded pricks claim to be. Because none of these fuckwits represent me and they make all the more sensible people look like FAGGOTS!
I'll get off my soapbox now.

 

[Jewish Porn Hoe]

I genuinely have no clue how the alt-right grift went from "fucking cuckservatives aren't hardcore enough and christcucks are just slaves to jews" to "CHRIST IS KANG, PRAISE GOD".

Because everybody with spicier opinions either got banned, lawfared, became esoteric to the point of incomprehensibility or had their reach throttled by tranny jannies at Google/Youtube/Twitter etc.

 

[Rosy Reptile]

I think what bothers me the most is the sexism, as Christianity is arguably the one of the nicest moralfagging religion to women. Retarded men have just ruined it or created false morality around purity culture that doesn't have biblical basis.

Genesis 1:27 says god created mankind and womankind in his own image. By virtue of creation they have equal worth and dignity, when Adam and Eve fell into sin that fucked everything up. Despite this, he gave the high honor of birthing Christ to a woman because of her gender not in spite of it. No omegaverse for men, women get to host the body of christ.

Jesus taught women specifically the same as men and women were some of his biggest followers. There are laws that ensure women get fair treatment including widows and single women. He paid equal attention to women who sought him for healing and forgiveness often to the shock of men within that society who were used to a very misogynistic one. A woman saw the first resurrection and women who brought news of the resurrection to the world.

Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus”... this also means that they should probably not be racist or anti-semites as it was Christianity that is what freed the slaves and Jesus was from the long nose tribe.

I've heard one of these faggots doing Ephesians 5:22 in bad faith. "wives are to submit to their husbands “as to the Lord.” out of context this seems sexist. BUT, the very next words command husbands to love their wives “just as Christ loved the church” and to love them “as their own bodies,” providing and "just as christ loves the church" . If you take into consideration that Christ acted as a servant to. The final passage is a mutual submission to one another as partners with reverence for Christ. Jesus' disciples commanded us to do the same —even sacrificing his life for the sake of women in John 13.

The talks of rape/etc. within the bible were often because that's what happened at the time. I think Deuteronomy was the biggest one but a description of something is different from "this is what you should do".

Genesis 3:16 is another that these faggots cite (incorrectly) which is " your desire will be for your husband and he will rule over you". The Hebrew phrase in question does not include a verb and is literally "toward your husband your desire" this "will be" is added to clarify as a future statement. The ongoing clarification from Adam & Eve is that "your desire will be to control your husband but he will rule over you". However, the statement that this will take place is not a biblical command nor is it saying that it is correct, it is saying it will happen. There is no biblical command for men to dominate women nor is there for women to dominate men. There are plenty of things said in the bible that "will" happen that are not good nor are they commands for it to happen.

Only because of equality offered in Christian cultures were many rights afforded to western women. Voting was first an idea gotten from Native American tribes where men and women would equally pick their leaders. The women who lived with these native women and had them speak at their conferences for voting rights fought for equal rights of all women to vote and used the bible as proof of equality to appeal to the western sentiment. Christianity does not have a hate boner for women and it's why things that the maidenless (and ladless) AFers sneed & feed about like Women's Suffrage was supported.

Saying the bible supports misogyny is just as misguided as saying the bible is feminist. If you take the history and people they were talking to in account, it was promoting complimentary parts. Insecure moids have also attempted to bolster misogyny using science, "history", laws of various nations and other preposterous things that are often misleading or downright false (IQ anyone?).

TL;DR- Nick & Tristian & other sneed n feed sexist groys are equal to women in the eyes of their God. Die mad about it.

You're right that you can't hate women, but you're taking that too far in an egalitarian direction. The whole "neither Jew nor Greek" etc thing is about Christians being children of God through adoption, not through descendance from Abraham. Making a distinction between the consequences and the punishment for the transgression in Eden is kind of hairsplitting, and you'd really have to bend the truth to make the argument that women's normative subservience to men is some sort of later corruption of the tradition, especially when St. Paul himself even forbids women from speaking and teaching in the Church.

That's just the normative case, though, and in the beginning it wasn't supposed to be that way. The division into male and female as we understand them was in anticipation of the fall, and won't exist in the eschaton. Men and women don't have separate human natures, they have the same. That's the significance of Eve's being taken from the rib of Adam. The best women, like the best men, have often become monastics and started to live the future angel-esque life even in this world, in many ways trancending the current order. There are some great books written by the nuns in the St. Xenia Skete in Northern California: one is "Letters to a Beginner" from Abbess Thaisia. It paints a much better picture of the ideal woman than the bleakness that is whatever feminism has to offer. It's especially better than anything lesbianism has to offer, since homosexuality always portrays the darkest parody of either sex (barring trans stuff). The kinds of women who become monastic saints are actual conquerors, and do so in spite of the world rather than with all of the funding of whatever men are using them politically. Not a bunch of girls dressing up in cosplay and simping for Spartan women while they buy their funko pops or whatever.

Feminism, when it isn't just a power grab for its own sake, is trying to use human means to solve a problem beyond human capabilities to fix. It's an aspect of the fallen human nature, not of politics or ideology or education. Where did you get your power from on this forum? Another woman? I don't think so. There are woman conquerors who make their own power structures, but it's very rare.

The AF hatred of women is wrong, but it's important to understand where it comes from and that it isn't the same as anti-egalitarianism. They hate women for the same reason that /r9k/ robots hate normalfags. There's an unwillingness that a lot of people have to acknowledge that there are people who, for no moral fault (there often is one, but not always), are just outside of the conventional social and romantic marketplaces; t's too disturbing of a thought to dwell on. They'd much rather have those people go and chop their balls off and play with legos in a dark room as eternal children than have to deal with the idea that those are adults with grown-up needs and feelings who are starving emotionally and, in many cases, actually going insane from loneliness.

They see women as sociopaths with no empathy, and this kind of thing is why. It's also why they love movies like Joker. It's about a guy who fell through the cracks of society and decided to get revenge on it for choosing to forget about people like him, so that they wouldn't have to face the fact that their constructed world was mostly an illusion built on top of constant suffering. That's also why a lot of people hated it and called it "nihilistic". It made them uncomfortable. It's a shame, though, that they (America First) can't take the Christian message out of those kinds of movies: this world is fallen and earthly happiness is a charade that not everyone can enjoy.

 

[Ultrapenguin]

My friend, @Rosy Reptile, what the everloving fuck are you talking about?

You realize the things you're sharing are autistic or OCD, right? You're supposed to be sharing an actual belief system people are supposed to live by, on a day to day basis.

How is what you're doing easier than accepting that the shit you're talking about is simply inapplicable to the modern day? This isn't a baseless insult, but is the (real) autism really that severe that it's easier obsessively dissecting every single element of biblical literature and pretending it has some profound meaning? You aren't even actually getting anything from the bible, you're just inserting your own interpretations and pretending you're getting it from the bible as some framework for what in reality are almost entirely your own personal opinions.

I'm serious when I say this reads like genuine clinical mental illness. Have you been checked out?

Spoiler: Groveling

(I'm am deeply ashamed of that 3200x people since 1776 number. Google mislead me. I should've known that made no sense)

I think what bothers me the most is the sexism, as Christianity is arguably the one of the nicest moralfagging religion to women. Retarded men have just ruined it or created false morality around purity culture that doesn't have biblical basis.

Genesis 1:27 says god created mankind and womankind in his own image. By virtue of creation they have equal worth and dignity, when Adam and Eve fell into sin that fucked everything up. Despite this, he gave the high honor of birthing Christ to a woman because of her gender not in spite of it. No omegaverse for men, women get to host the body of christ.

Jesus taught women specifically the same as men and women were some of his biggest followers. There are laws that ensure women get fair treatment including widows and single women. He paid equal attention to women who sought him for healing and forgiveness often to the shock of men within that society who were used to a very misogynistic one. A woman saw the first resurrection and women who brought news of the resurrection to the world.

Galatians 3:28 "There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus”... this also means that they should probably not be racist or anti-semites as it was Christianity that is what freed the slaves and Jesus was from the long nose tribe.

I've heard one of these faggots doing Ephesians 5:22 in bad faith. "wives are to submit to their husbands “as to the Lord.” out of context this seems sexist. BUT, the very next words command husbands to love their wives “just as Christ loved the church” and to love them “as their own bodies,” providing and "just as christ loves the church" . If you take into consideration that Christ acted as a servant to. The final passage is a mutual submission to one another as partners with reverence for Christ. Jesus' disciples commanded us to do the same —even sacrificing his life for the sake of women in John 13.

The talks of rape/etc. within the bible were often because that's what happened at the time. I think Deuteronomy was the biggest one but a description of something is different from "this is what you should do".

Genesis 3:16 is another that these faggots cite (incorrectly) which is " your desire will be for your husband and he will rule over you". The Hebrew phrase in question does not include a verb and is literally "toward your husband your desire" this "will be" is added to clarify as a future statement. The ongoing clarification from Adam & Eve is that "your desire will be to control your husband but he will rule over you". However, the statement that this will take place is not a biblical command nor is it saying that it is correct, it is saying it will happen. There is no biblical command for men to dominate women nor is there for women to dominate men. There are plenty of things said in the bible that "will" happen that are not good nor are they commands for it to happen.

Only because of equality offered in Christian cultures were many rights afforded to western women. Voting was first an idea gotten from Native American tribes where men and women would equally pick their leaders. The women who lived with these native women and had them speak at their conferences for voting rights fought for equal rights of all women to vote and used the bible as proof of equality to appeal to the western sentiment. Christianity does not have a hate boner for women and it's why things that the maidenless (and ladless) AFers sneed & feed about like Women's Suffrage was supported.

Saying the bible supports misogyny is just as misguided as saying the bible is feminist. If you take the history and people they were talking to in account, it was promoting complimentary parts. Insecure moids have also attempted to bolster misogyny using science, "history", laws of various nations and other preposterous things that are often misleading or downright false (IQ anyone?).

TL;DR- Nick & Tristian & other sneed n feed sexist groys are equal to women in the eyes of their God. Die mad about it.

Speaking of dumb things, you're dumb Meiwaku.

Rosy is autistically obsessed with the bible, you're autistically obsessed with whatever strange hangups you have about men and women and inequality to the point of fetishizing lesbianism instead, even though I don't believe you're a lesbian. Nowadays apparently women can't have self respect and thoughts without being lesbians or tranny.

And anyways, this is the problem, the bible has been used to mean all kinds of shit, it's totally up to interpretation and cherry picking, if motherfuckers aren't willing to continue things like "If you steal something from someone you must return what you stole plus 1/5 and the strongest male goat from your herd" and "You must expel menstruating women from your house" then what does it mean?
Fucking nothing, it means nothing, this is stupid childish shit for stupid childish people who are spinning chaotically through the world and want to pretend if they only cling hard enough to the past it'll somehow restore the sense of peace they believe existed back then, even though that's also a stupid childish belief.

It's all so fucking retarded. It doesn't matter how much people pathetically mewl and grasp at the apron strings of the history books, it won't give them easy answers to a time that has no historical comparison. It's time to stop being a coward and be your own person.

 

[Tornado]

@Uberpenguin You have received everything that you are, you are an amalgam of your parents and television and your grade school teachers’ lesson plans and plenty of unknown sources from across time and space. To be your own person is to let your passions rule you which is total slavery to these influences. This is the Nietzschean problem, will to power belongs to the bestiary of philosophy because you embody nothing but the loneliest sense of regurgitation. You cannot be your own person any more than you can create your own purpose, a proposition as absurd as your liver deciding to be your lungs or you deciding to be a cucumber. Nothing exists in your mind that you didn’t observe, so how you can expect to liberate yourself from your observations requires obfuscation.

 

[Meiwaku]

@Uberpenguin i bible spergged because AF uses Christianity. I gave a Christian defense of women even though I myself am not Christian. I'm basically using their own spergging against them. I'm aware the bible was written for a bronze age society as a "how to" guide for people on how to live. Why banish a mensturating woman from the main house? Blood getting everywhere is bad for cleanliness and even ancient peoples got this as they understood those who lived by human waste got sicker more easily . Secondly, many tribes globally practiced allowing women who were mensturating to have their own hut to spiritually reflect/ hang out with other women/ sing/not labor/etc. I'm of mind to believe that this could have been the same in this region of the world. But I'm an optimist.

I'm sorry but even if I wasn't gay I wouldn't sleep with you. I have always had self respect and I know many women who are hetero who have it as well.

You should have a Snickers tho, you're getting very MATI.


@Rosy Reptile

Where did you get your power from on this forum? Another woman?

Read above.

Women make and raise every human. The voice of ones mother in the womb influences what is held within.

There was also a common practice in Roman times since women couldn't "rule" that a literal woman would be behind the curtain (usually mom or wife) telling her male mouthpiece what to say. This also happened in China as well as Japan. And if you think every grand idea can ever be attributed to a man who confided in his wife you're wrong, Einstein's wife determined his theory of relativity because she was present at every mathsperg dinner and left college to support his ass (he put her on the patent and said as much so when he later ran for deadbeat dad of the year in America she had every right to sue him and win) and Ruth Bader Ginsburg hand typed all her husband's law notes for classes/all his papers when he had cancer to ensure he passed his classes and graduate. Theodora saved Byzantium during Nika riots and Wu Zeitain had the second longest reigning dynasty which only shows that letting a woman do it directly makes more sense than having them whisper in an Emperor's ear. (her 50 year reign was second only to first Emperor of China) Asking for women to stop using their mouthpieces or to take credit for their societal influence in an egalitarian fashion isn't "unnatural" it's unironically "cutting out the middle man".

As to the main question.... Where do I get my power from on the forum? Men weren't alone in creating computing or the internet or even the kiwi of farms. There were important female coders /sitefags but even more fundamentally these men did not wipe their own arses from birth, take themselves to school, nor did they cook their own meals or learn about the world in a vacuum like many would like to pretend. Men who were "great" often had someone to worry about daily life for them so they could be "great" and the watcher of all of this was the woman. Example:

Thoreau spent his days LARPING in a cabin in the woods but failed to mention he had someone to do his laundry, cook his food, clean his shit up. He was only allowed to be "his own man" because his mother did everything for him. This is America First incarnate and basically the fundamental issue of why all men aren't all as great as they think they are.

So yes, I do get my power from a woman even if it's indirectly through the fundamental raising and care of the autistic overlord. Our dear feeder didn't just appear in a vacuum as an effigy full guns and ammo ready for saving internet bullying one forum at a time.

 

[Bioniclelover]

and Wu Zeitain had the second longest reigning dynasty which only shows that letting a woman do it directly makes more sense than having them whisper in an Emperor's ear. (her 50 year reign was second only to first Emperor of China) Asking for women to stop using their mouthpieces or to take credit for their societal influence in an egalitarian fashion isn't "unnatural" it's unironically "cutting out the middle man".

Wu Zetian? You mean that old woman who ordered her husband emperor to kill his own son from the other wife and later as a ruling monarch had her own son killed as well as her own grandson and granddaughter to commit suicide for criticizing her blatant favoritism of her lovers? I don't really see what you are trying to prove here.

I don't actually have anything else to say in regards to the rest of your post.