Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Głosy: 104 8,6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Głosy: 631 52,1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Głosy: 9 0,7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Głosy: 112 9,2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Głosy: 37 3,1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Głosy: 309 25,5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Głosy: 9 0,7%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    1 211
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wu, being a know it all again:

[MEDIA=twitter]676176230152990720[/MEDIA]
https://archive.is/arexp

Also:

[MEDIA=twitter]676178750837403648[/MEDIA]
I'd say something snide if not for the fact that my cat does the same thing if i leave toilet paper in reach. Also, how much were those dogs collectively. Havanese are generally not a cheap breed.
 
"I like concrete, measurable reality." - John "Dullard" Flynt

OK, John.

Wyświetl załącznik 63108

http://www.beakscore.com/welcome/beakme/?u=spacekatgal

Bonus: "Your" "smartest" tweet is you quoting someone else.
My favorite part is Wu's smartest and unsmartest tweet(her smartest one is a quote)

image.png
 
John Flynt battles a "boys' club mentality" by pretending to be a game developer while pretending to be a woman.
 
So, did I miss it or do we have confirmation, if Wu came out in that panel or not?
Almost certainly not. If she did, she'd have rounded up everyone who still listens to her, for the patented broad-spectrum media blast.
Speaking of, if she ever wanted to get a real (well, real-ish) job she'd probably be decent at Natalie's supposed job. She lives on social media and has that special lamprey-sense of just the right people to suck up to.
 
Almost certainly not. If she did, she'd have rounded up everyone who still listens to her, for the patented broad-spectrum media blast.
Speaking of, if she ever wanted to get a real (well, real-ish) job she'd probably be decent at Natalie's supposed job. She lives on social media and has that special lamprey-sense of just the right people to suck up to.
Too bad she doesn't have enough sense to be an effective filter. Plus, whoever hires her still has to deal with her toxic personality.
 
Almost certainly not. If she did, she'd have rounded up everyone who still listens to her, for the patented broad-spectrum media blast.
Speaking of, if she ever wanted to get a real (well, real-ish) job she'd probably be decent at Natalie's supposed job. She lives on social media and has that special lamprey-sense of just the right people to suck up to.
She'd argue with everyone on the company twitter instead of filtering.
 
Almost certainly not. If she did, she'd have rounded up everyone who still listens to her, for the patented broad-spectrum media blast.
Speaking of, if she ever wanted to get a real (well, real-ish) job she'd probably be decent at Natalie's supposed job. She lives on social media and has that special lamprey-sense of just the right people to suck up to.
I've said it before, but if Wu ever got a real office job, the H.R. rep would almost certainly be driven suicidal after the fiftieth or sixtieth complaint she filed.
 
Powerleveling - You just went full Wu.
"I like concrete, measurable reality." - John "Dullard" Flynt

OK, John.

Wyświetl załącznik 63108

http://www.beakscore.com/welcome/beakme/?u=spacekatgal

Bonus: "Your" "smartest" tweet is you quoting someone else.
IsUVVi2.png

LOL. Penguinz0/Cr1tikal is smarter than Wu.
Yes, the same LPer who tweets stuff like this:
xJbbwAs.png

is smarter than someone who calls themselves and engineer.
What's even funnier is this:
DGwRgGJ.png

Wu's dumber than a pedophile!!
 
The beakscore algorithm just doesn't recognize finely crafted snark. Rest assured, GSX's new project will recognize the FULL emotional spectrum, as showcased in Revolution 60.
 
The beakscore algorithm just doesn't recognize finely crafted snark. Rest assured, GSX's new project will recognize the FULL emotional spectrum, as showcased in Revolution 60.
Even if Wu could pull this off:
Considering that Wu would most likely use her own face as a basis to train her new software how to read human emotion, users would need to leave their mouth hanging open so it works.

User: *snarls*
Program: You are happy!
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole