behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 17 Maj 2021
The ‘genocide’ rhetoric is incredibly offensive AND stupid. When people think about genocide they picture the Holocaust, or thousands of dead bodies - men, women, and children - slaughtered and lying in the streets in Rawanda. The tranny rhetoric is not only hysterical and disingenuous - it is used specifically to try and shame people for any flicker of resistance to the trans narrative. If gender dysphoria is so genuinely terrible, then most parents are going to want their child to suffer as little as possible. TRAs love to talk about how much they suffer each day - so why would any loving parent want that outcome for their child? There’s no real evidence that transition actually helps in the long-term, and having your child mutilated and made medically dependent is something no sane parents want. My point is that if there are other good options to cure/treat gender dysphoria that don’t involve the radical modifications and toxic culture that goes part and parcel with transitioning, then that is what any sane person would choose. It’s one thing for an adult to make stupid and harmful decisions about their body, but training/grooming kids to do the same thing is a whole other ball of nope. Then once you factor in the absolute batshit-crazy trans bullshit so prevalent in social media, along with the overt MAPs/pedophilia presence, it becomes just one big mob of predatory degenerates - yeah, no.
They are taking advantage of the definition of “genocide” that refers to the deliberate practice of removing entire generations of children from their culture by force so that the culture will die out. Practices like forcing indigenous children into residential schools in Canada (where they were forbidden to speak their native languages, forced to practice Christianity, etc). Never mind that that is not what the average person thinks of when they hear “genocide.” Or that (more importantly) they are comparing the threat of removing children from parents who are actively pursuing cutting off healthy organs to fucking residential schools.
(Note: not that I’m at all in favor of "removal from the home" as a first line of action. The focus should be on pursuing the ghouls making money off this and outlawing the propaganda.)
No, most men here in the US are circumcised at birth. It's somewhat less common today when babies are born, but still probably close to 80-90% of babies.
It’s no longer that high; it’s below 60% now and varies a lot by region (rates are very low on the west coast I believe). Still stupidly high though.
Circumcision is a good example of how the US healthcare system is terrible at weeding out unnecessary treatments, though, which is relevant to the subject of this thread. Like, in the UK where your healthcare is paid for by the government, that same government had an incentive to say “wait, is circumcision actually doing anything positive? Why are we paying for this?” and then stopped funding it (unless it's done for medical reasons like phimosis). But the US just sucks at doing shit like that. Technically insurance companies should rein in bogus treatments that don't do much except make people money, but they don’t. I guess for whatever reason they don’t have the same power behind them as a country's government saying “hold on a second, why exactly are we giving doctors money for this?”
And it's the same with the troon stuff. Which is why the countries we are seeing start to pull back on fast-tracked unproven treatments are the ones with government-funded healthcare, like the UK and Nordic countries. My prediction is we will continue to see the more sensible European countries gradually shut this shit down, while it will continue to rampage through the American system for a few decades, and any pushback that does happen will come from outside of healthcare.

