Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Głosy: 104 8,6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Głosy: 631 52,1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Głosy: 9 0,7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Głosy: 112 9,2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Głosy: 37 3,1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Głosy: 309 25,5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Głosy: 9 0,7%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    1 211
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
"Your top five words: rt, women, think, people, game"
She's making about $2-3 per tweet

upload_2015-11-30_1-2-39.png


It looks like she does put in an 8 hour workday, who knows what shes's doing but she clearly sits in front of her computer most of the day. Not really exactly what I expected. But of course this means she obviously fucks off constantly. After she gets her business in order for the day and fires off a few tweets she should at least block off part of her morning to work undistracted. Looks like she stops working after lunch on fridays and has to go somewhere thursdays.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Keep in mind the the only thing Stoya has been confirmed to do is run to Twitter. As far as we know, she did not contact the police nor submit evidence of a crime yet, but look at all the mindless assholes already convicting the accused in the court of public opinion:

Everyone mindlessly believes Stoya.png



Even Glenn, one of Wu's friends, he even tries to be a voice of sanity, but even he crumbles and winds up telling Wu what he wants to hear:

Even Glenn Fleischman has no spine.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I can't believe Flynt really is trying to call out another conman.
Look, I know Flynt isn't bright, but even he has to realize that's a bad idea.
I really hope the person he attacks turns it around. Wait until Flynt does his podcast then announce that the woman is actually a transgender domestic abuse and rape survivor that was using a pseudonym to avoid her ex boyfriend.
 
What does Stoya have to lose by making a rape accusation? Someone inform me because I'm pretty sure the answer is nothing.

If the accusation is false, the accused has a case against them.

If it's true, she still loses, because instead of denying the defense an attempt to attack her character and give them a chance to take apart her arguments in advance, she has instead tainted her credibility and made it very hard for the accused to receive a fair trial. Even if she wins, she'll have a very uphill battle to get there. Also, rape is one of the hardest crimes to convict based simply on hearsay, so if she hasn't submitted evidence of the rape ASAP while most of the physical evidence is fresh, it boils down to her word against his, one of the worst situations to ever prove anything.
 
I guess she should possibly get black-listed from some of the porn industry.

Considering how much support she will get for this move, I doubt that Stoya will in any way care about potential blacklists.
If the accusation is false, the accused has a case against them.

If it's true, she still loses, because instead of denying the defense an attempt to attack her character and give them a chance to take apart her arguments in advance, she has instead tainted her credibility and made it very hard for the accused to receive a fair trial. Even if she wins, she'll have a very uphill battle to get there. Also, rape is one of the hardest crimes to convict based simply on hearsay, so if she hasn't submitted evidence of the rape ASAP while most of the physical evidence is fresh, it boils down to her word against his, one of the worst situations to ever prove anything.

For the sake of argument I'm going to pretend the accusation is true: I agree that it will be a hard battle to convince anything if she takes it to court, but in the eyes of the public, she's already a hero for daring to speak up. Public pressure can be quite powerful too, especially in a case that involves plenty of emotions.

That's all assuming she'll actually take it to court, mind you.
 
Why the fuck are feminists just so dead set on trying to just magically make rape prosecutions happen without reporting or even evidence? It's retardedly counterproductive.
Because a lot of deeds which SJWs deem to be rape do not constitute rape from a legal or moral viewpoint -- like, the girl has had a glass of wine or two and the guy did not ask explicitly whether it was okay that he put his hand on her knee: BOOM, RAPE! from a SJW standpoint.

Under no jurisdiction would someone get jailed for rape because he put his hand on a slightly buzzed girl's knee after they have been flirting for an hour. The SJWs know the police and courts won't help them, so instead they use twitter lynchmobs as attack squads against men who have not followed SJW protocol in every detail.

This is all the more sad because it trivializes real, brutal rape.
 
Because a lot of deeds which SJWs deem to be rape do not constitute rape from a legal or moral viewpoint -- like, the girl has had a glass of wine or two and the guy did not ask explicitly whether it was okay that he put his hand on her knee: BOOM, RAPE! from a SJW standpoint.

Under no jurisdiction would someone get jailed for rape because he put his hand on a slightly buzzed girl's knee after they have been flirting for an hour. The SJWs know the police and courts won't help them, so instead they use twitter lynchmobs as attack squads against men who have not followed SJW protocol in every detail.

This is all the more sad because it trivializes real, brutal rape.

Although this does have a silver lining, as it's causing a schism in the SJW community, with the lunatics who want to do this being called out by the SJWs that still do possess an iota of sense, which will only lead to the crazies becoming craziers, more lolcow milk for us, and for those that hate SJWs, more fracturing of their whole movement.
 
This is all the more sad because it trivializes real, brutal rape.

It also trivializes real rape of the date rape variety in more ambiguous situations. After endless repetitions of these ludicrous, bullshit accusations, people will be inclined to err against assuming guilt. First, they already should because while the world isn't a court, the presumption of innocence is, generally, a good idea. But second, when the prevailing SJW definition of rape is clearly delusional, one can assume many accusations will be similarly delusional and will include things that aren't rape by any rational definition.
 
being called out by the SJWs that still do possess an iota of sense,
At that point they stop becoming SJWs and are just people with concerns.
It also trivializes real rape of the date rape variety in more ambiguous situations. After endless repetitions of these ludicrous, bullshit accusations, people will be inclined to err against assuming guilt. First, they already should because while the world isn't a court, the presumption of innocence is, generally, a good idea. But second, when the prevailing SJW definition of rape is clearly delusional, one can assume many accusations will be similarly delusional and will include things that aren't rape by any rational definition.
They always try to push the edge of what's considered rape on the offensive... creepy stares, catcalling, drunken encounters where both parties could probably technically drive and probably make it home but they'd still get a dui if the cops blew them (it's my understanding this is rape technically since there is no consent if you know otherwise I'd like to hear).

Then when they're defensive they'll say you're condoning stubenville and talk about cases where women are brutally raped. I've seen this tactic with more than one SJW.
 
At that point they stop becoming SJWs and are just people with concerns.

They always try to push the edge of what's considered rape on the offensive... creepy stares, catcalling, drunken encounters where both parties could probably technically drive and probably make it home but they'd still get a dui if the cops blew them (it's my understanding this is rape technically since there is no consent if you know otherwise I'd like to hear).

It is rape when there is no consent. Intoxication has to be sufficient to nullify consent.

Consent is a highly circumstance-dependent thing, and there are no bright line rules about it. There isn't a specific BAC at which you legally cease to be able to consent.

There are obvious cases, where someone is incapable of even speaking or standing up, where there probably isn't consent.

Many cases aren't so obvious.

There's a difference between impaired judgment, when someone might make a decision they later regret, and actually being incapable of understanding and consenting to something.

Needless to say, it's probably a bad idea to combine alcohol with strange. . .but that's basically what singles bars are for and millions of people do it every year without it being rape.

Then when they're defensive they'll say you're condoning stubenville and talk about cases where women are brutally raped. I've seen this tactic with more than one SJW.

That's called a motte-and-bailey argument. The "motte" being a defensible fortified structure and the "bailey" being the walled town outside it. You really want to possess the whole area.

So you stake out a shit-ton of radical rhetorical ground, which is the dumb shit like a man farting is rape. Then when called out on it, you flee back to the "motte," the defensible castle, which is the position almost everyone would agree with. Stuff like the Steubenville coverup was bad. How could you support that, you bad person?

Then when nobody is looking you go back to the ridiculous, indefensible position.
 
Wu, isn't bragging about how rich you are a sign of PRIVILEGE?

Spacekatgal_status_671517324839620608.png


Also, whoop de fucking shit. Multi-core processors last a lot longer because applications like graphics programs are usually designed to multithread if and where possible for increased efficiency since they tend to be CPU whores, this is not fucking news to anyone who has actually fucked around with this shit since the Pentium 4 onwards.

This also reduces overall stress since the load is split across processors instead of forced onto one core, and so long as you have decent heatsinks and/or additional cooling, you could re do NASA level calculation jobs over a period of decades and have the PC not die on you so long as nothing else goes squirrely in the box since the processors do not incur any appreciable damage at all unless you consistently overload them and the heat starts doing damage to the motherboard/processor chips.

In short, quit bragging, white man, this shit doesn't make you special, it makes you a rich fuck bragging about your toys.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wu, isn't bragging about how rich you are a sign of PRIVILEGE?

Wyświetl załącznik 60925

Also, whoop de fucking shit. Multi-core processors last a lot longer because applications like graphics programs are usually designed to multithread if and where possible for increased efficiency since they tend to be CPU whores, this is not fucking news to anyone who has actual fucked around with this shit since the Pentium 4 onwards.

This also reduces overall stress since the load is split across processors instead of forced onto one core, and so long as you have decent heatsinks and/or additional cooling, you could re do NASA level calculation jobs over a period of decades and have the PC not die on you so long as nothing else goes squirrely in the box since the processors do not incur any appreciable damage at all unless you consistently overload them and the heat starts doing damage to the motherboard/processor chips.

In short, quit bragging, white man, this shit doesn't make you special, it's makes you a rick fuck bragging about your toys.
Well now we know what the minimum system requirements for Rev 60 PC are going to be.
 
Wu, isn't bragging about how rich you are a sign of PRIVILEGE?

Wyświetl załącznik 60925

Also, whoop de fucking shit. Multi-core processors last a lot longer because applications like graphics programs are usually designed to multithread if and where possible for increased efficiency since they tend to be CPU whores, this is not fucking news to anyone who has actual fucked around with this shit since the Pentium 4 onwards.

This also reduces overall stress since the load is split across processors instead of forced onto one core, and so long as you have decent heatsinks and/or additional cooling, you could re do NASA level calculation jobs over a period of decades and have the PC not die on you so long as nothing else goes squirrely in the box since the processors do not incur any appreciable damage at all unless you consistently overload them and the heat starts doing damage to the motherboard/processor chips.

In short, quit bragging, white man, this shit doesn't make you special, it's makes you a rick fuck bragging about your toys.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't keeping the CPU at a high-but-manageable temperature do less damage than putting the CPU under repeated thermal and load cycles?
 
I'm sure there was at least one African American driver or deliveryman that helped in bringing John one package among the thousands of dollars he's pissed away on Apple products #BlackLivesMatter
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole