Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Kevin Gibes / Kathryn Gibes / TransSalamander / RageTreb / The Green Salamander - "Am hole:" The epitomized Twitter MtF you thought was just a myth! Donate to his Transformers toy fund today!
It's only the fantasy of doing that which he likes. Dilating is very uncomfortable and way more so for a botched Amhole like Kevin has. Also he is lazy and obviously hates the mangled mess that was once his dick.
This is why i hate when troons keep transing the dead. They were exceedingly rare, but trans people did actually exist. We know this because the historical record makes a huge deal out of the few that did. I’m thinking of a man (can’t remember the name) who lived during the 13th century, and worked as a prostitute. Prostitution was legal at the time (though stigmatized), but homosexuality was not, and when this guy was arrested, he was like “I may be a whore, but I am no man.” And people’s minds were blown—why did this guy want to be a woman?! That’s the worst thing you could be! And they ended up bringing the guy back in several times just to try and get their heads around what his deal was. In the end, they just kind of said “well, that’s weird af buddy, but you do you, i guess.”
So if the historical record doesn't make a big deal out of a person living as the opposite sex, then they weren’t trans.
That's fucking retarded and is predicated on the idea that being "trans" exists at all. Wow, a faggot living in a time when you couldn't be a faggot would have preferred to be a woman -- how revolutionary. You think this man magically had a "female" brain or something? How the fuck does being trans exist in any meaningful way? And there's certainly no historical equivalent to what we're seeing nowadays. I guess Joan of Arc wearing armor so she wouldn't be raped must have secretly been a trans man all along as well.
That's fucking retarded and is predicated on the idea that being "trans" exists at all. Wow, a faggot living in a time when you couldn't be a faggot would have preferred to be a woman -- how revolutionary. You think this man magically had a "female" brain or something? How the fuck does being trans exist in any meaningful way? And there's certainly no historical equivalent to what we're seeing nowadays. I guess Joan of Arc wearing armor so she wouldn't be raped must have secretly been a trans man all along as well.
Yeah I don't really think there is such a thing as a tranny. If there's a 'Y' you're a guy. Gender is not on a spectrum. Full stop.
Gender expression is certainly on a spectrum. No one's debating that, obviously.
This confusion is what happens when you have a current-year mob mentality that crucifies anyone that dares bring up painful basic truths about sex and biology. You have biology professors across academia afraid of losing their jobs so they keep quiet or kick the can down the road.
This is why I'm thankful for people like Kevin, Jon Yaniv, Tombomb and other troon faggots. They have the troon Midas touch - they create TERFs (or better yet, just TEs) out of everyone they come in contact with. I take comfort knowing that nobody really likes trannies the same way no open-borders liberal really wants his neighborhood filled with ICE escapees and hoodrats.
Jesus Christ his toobs are placed on his body like a horses eyes. Those niggers have different zip codes. Like, when you wanna do close-up photos, you shouldn’t have to take two separate photos of them the way he had to. It’s like he took 2 party hats and strapped them to either side of a fucking barrel.
Yeah I don't really think there is such a thing as a tranny. If there's a 'Y' you're a guy. Gender is not on a spectrum. Full stop.
Gender expression is certainly on a spectrum. No one's debating that, obviously.
This confusion is what happens when you have a current-year mob mentality that crucifies anyone that dares bring up painful basic truths about sex and biology. You have biology professors across academia afraid of losing their jobs so they keep quiet or kick the can down the road.
I mean I don't wanna sperg too much about trannies because it's really beside the point, but even under their own logic it's quite meaningless. The current bullshit they're forcing people to spout is that some people magically develop a different "brain sex" than their physical sex and act like this is some biological reality and medical consensus that anyone who isn't retarded believes in. As if it's some gotcha that means transwomen are totally women all along.
Like, okay, let's pretend that nonsense is true. Then trannies STILL would not be women because it means all this time we've been using woman to refer to a person with a female brain and female body (even though that's retarded). We'd need some magical new word to describe these centaur people with female brains and male bodies -- oh wait, we already have one and it's tranny lol. Like it goes right back to square one.
I see a lot of parallels between trannies and deathfats when it comes to their thoughts on "the surgery." For deathfats it's gastric bypass which they think is a magic pill that will instantly cure all their problems, when in reality it's an operation that requires a permanent and significant lifestyle change to be successful. You have to change who you are as a person to make it work, and a lot of fatties simply won't do that. You see it with trannies and amholes too, they think having a neovagina carved into them is going to magically end their mental anguish and once they have had "the surgery" they won't have to do anything more. See Kevin's refusal to dilate. Dilation is a necessary part of his life now but he's simply too lazy and stupid to do it, just like fatties who are too lazy and stupid to change their eating habits after they've had gastric bypass, who go right to being fat again and in certain circumstances, die when their stomach basically explodes from them eating too much relative to its reduced capacity post-surgery.
You think this man magically had a "female" brain or something? How the fuck does being trans exist in any meaningful way? And there's certainly no historical equivalent to what we're seeing nowadays. I guess Joan of Arc wearing armor so she wouldn't be raped must have secretly been a trans man all along as well.
I wasn’t saying that the dude wasn’t mentally ill, i was just just pointing out that this type mental illness has always been extremely rare, and that the historical record refutes TRAs’ attempts to make any GNC figure “trans” in an effort to justify the increasing number of troons we see today (a point i agree with you on: there are definitely more trans-identified people today than there ever were throughout history). This also refutes TRAs’ claim that trans people were so persecuted, that they were just “afraid to come out”. Because most people who insisted on living as the opposite sex were given cart blanche to do so (see: women who pretended to be men so they could join monasteries—when they were found out, it was actually considered a level-up for them. “Wow, this woman managed to overcome her lustful female nature and become a monk—good on her!”)
This is why i hate when troons keep transing the dead. They were exceedingly rare, but trans people did actually exist. We know this because the historical record makes a huge deal out of the few that did. I’m thinking of a man (can’t remember the name) who lived during the 13th century, and worked as a prostitute. Prostitution was legal at the time (though stigmatized), but homosexuality was not, and when this guy was arrested, he was like “I may be a whore, but I am no man.” And people’s minds were blown—why did this guy want to be a woman?! That’s the worst thing you could be! And they ended up bringing the guy back in several times just to try and get their heads around what his deal was. In the end, they just kind of said “well, that’s weird af buddy, but you do you, i guess.”
So if the historical record doesn't make a big deal out of a person living as the opposite sex, then they weren’t trans.
I have to wonder where this man lived, if he somehow got away with his life, despite claiming to be a woman. As even something like transvestitism was seen as abhorrent and immoral (which it rightfully is). So how could a man claiming to be a woman have gotten off scot-free?
I have to wonder where this man lived, if he somehow got away with his life, despite claiming to be a woman. As even something like transvestitism was seen as abhorrent and immoral (which it rightfully is). So how could a man claiming to be a woman have gotten off scot-free?
Eh… medieval anti-sodomy laws were… interesting. “Sodomy” was simply an umbrella term that meant “any kind of sex that couldn’t result in pregnancy”, and homosexuality fell under this umbrella. Occasionally whomever was running the church would start a push to denounce the sinfulness of sodomy (usually just amounting to making people confess and pay penance), but peoples’ reactions to this were mixed. They also weren't supposed to have sex during Lent, but the number of babies born nine months after sometime during Lent proves that they still did.
Medieval medical knowledge built upon the ancient Roman four humors theory, where men were considered hot, dry, and “rational”, and women were considered cold, wet, and “lustful”. Male homosexuality was looked down upon because it was considered something that made men more feminine and less “rational” (interestingly, having too much straight sex was considered to have the same effect). So a homosexual would have had a bad reputation, but people largely didn’t care about punishing him if he kept to himself (“oh you know, he’s a lost soul” and all that). Lesbians were given more of a pass because the current thinking was “well, you know ladies… so lustful. Can’t leave ‘em alone for ten minutes without them trying to hump eachother…”
Lack of specific terminology for sex crimes also confuses the record a bit. Take the case of a man in the 14th century being executed for “sodomy”, three months after another man convicted of sodomy was fined, told to stop being gay, and sent on his way. Turns out that the man who was merely fined was having consensual sex with other grown men, whereas the man who was executed had raped an eight-year-old boy. There was no specific legal terminology for child rape, so it went under the “sodomy” umbrella, even though it was considered much worse than simply being gay.
Jean de Arc was an interesting case because the whole “cross dressing” thing was pulled out of thin air so they could have a reason for executing her. The real reason they wanted to execute her, of course, was because she was a skilled military strategist who claimed to receive visions from God, and fought for the other side. If she had been on their side, they would have paraded her through the streets as a devout luminary, but since she wasn’t, they had to keep her from gaining followers from their own side. So they tried to trick her into committing heresy, and when that didn’t work, they used sheer mental gymnastics to say “well… she wore armor, and armor is men’s clothes, innit? So that means she’s a cross-dresser, and there’s one obscure Bible verse that says you ain’t supposed to do that. So that means we can execute her!”
Bottom line is, people didn't really care what you were up to if you weren’t causing a disturbance, the Crown wasn’t concerned if you were upper class, and the Church griped about it, but it didn't have as much power as people imagine it did.
Male homosexuality was looked down upon because it was considered something that made men more feminine and less “rational” (interestingly, having too much straight sex was considered to have the same effect).
I suppose I can see the logic there, since rationality isn't the basis for why someone has sex. At least when the intent isn't mere procreation. And having too much would mean one's lustful proclivities are too great a focus, and thus best avoided. Though I personally find it unfortunate more wasn't done to go against that kind of thing, in those days. Though I'm sure it was more than what's done now, considering what efforts are being made to accept things like bestiality and pedophilia. However ineffective those efforts might be.
Something tells me it’s because they’re not sure you’ll make it another 90 days without offing yourself, Kevin.
Well, even though the founder of AVEN himself doesn't think it makes sense to include Aces with the LGB (cue reddit asexuals crying about acephobia), I will agree that it makes more sense to lump aces in with gays than it does to let trannies be part of the alphabet.
That alpaca looks like it’s contemplating going carnivore and wondering how easy Kevin would be to subdue.
It could be a good adjacent grift for a private practice doctor: Well...that's a bit...concerning. ((taps several times on ipad)) ((hands him paper)) On your way out, pass this to the receptionist and wait. I'm going to need some labwork today. And we'll need to schedule you for a biopsy. There are several...concerning areas in the vestibule of your...vaginal canal. We just want to rule out anything serious, like cancer...
Imagine having a really shitty day and having to rely on twitter asspats from the likes of Kevvie for moral support. This tweet almost makes me feel bad for Neck. Then I remember that he's a deadbeat dad who left his wife and children to go fingerbang the amhole, and my sympathy suddenly evaporates. Link | Archive
"Going outside alone & visibly trans makes you truly braver than the marines." Link | Archive
would anyone care if some dudes were like "yeah, I like to wear skinny jeans and makeup, and sometimes I even wear skirts, but I'm still a dude" and like, didn't try to use the women's room or demand people call him a girl? I know most people wouldn't cause anyone who remembers the mid-2000's emo craze where dudes wearing eyeliner and dressing flamboyantly was trendy remembers that this wasn't a big deal. this is why I can't accept it when people say "troons just want to live their lives in peace" cause for a bunch of people who just want to live their lives, they sure love making a lot of demands of everyone else.
Well, even though the founder of AVEN himself doesn't think it makes sense to include Aces with the LGB (cue reddit asexuals crying about acephobia), I will agree that it makes more sense to lump aces in with gays than it does to let trannies be part of the alphabet.
Isn't AIDS now a heckin valid identity that's on the new Buttsex pride flag? Why not include awkward 12 year olds and castrated transsexuals on there as well? make it extra silly.
He's still tracing I see. It looks this time like he's combining multiple references and then tracing the jigsaw puzzle of the pieces. I can tell its traced because all the parts from the different photographs have different perspectives which clash as opposed to all being conformed to the same perspective planes. Besides the boring technical reasons, we know his art isn't complete potato quality only when he traces. He's a novice and has not yet studied art trying to improve
The nerve of this cunt telling off a bartender for not acknowledging his specialness. If it were not for the fact that i’m 100% certain this conversation didn’t happen (or at least the ending didn’t happen), i’d be pissed off
I lose a bit of sympathy, purely due to the fact that he took the time to blot-out the fire emotes in his name. If it was just the profile picture, then it wouldn't have mattered to me. But going one extra step to express your supposed grief and anguish by blotting out your username makes me think this is all a performative farce.