Odpowiedzi na post #52 105

As an alternative, sure. But since we are arguing the motion was granted improperly, then Lolcow LLC would have to be served under Rule 4 (h) (b)...

Just to reiterate, Lolcow LLC is NOT a party to Russell's proceeding. Thus there is no need to serve that entity as they are not being sued. He is...

Well, maybe. But it would have to be a defendant first. No. Otherwise you could never contest service of process because just doing so would be...