Odpowiedzi na post #58 695

They aren’t even hiding it at this point. Holy fuck, could this be used against them in SCOTUS?

I think they mean there were multiple recounts of the votes. But yeah, this is poorly worded.

They are referencing recounts. The wording, admittedly, seems tailor-crafted to antagonize people who insist that votes have been re-used (despite...

>these insignificant attempts So they are going to ignore it like arrogant tools, cool.

Ooooooh. they're getting scared now. Actually, scratch that. They're not scared - they're PANTS-SHITTINGLY TERRIFIED. And all I can say...

I interpreted it as a clumsy attempt at friendly banter that falls flat because it's not coming from a genuine place and he's assuming familiarity...

Found this: