Odpowiedzi na post #36 622

It's hilarious and sad that they are literally trying to burn Nick down, and only proving him right because they're so pathetically incompetent

The question reads as did Vic bless Nick making it without his knowledge, Vic says No. How is that contradictory to Vic supporting it after it is...

Colour me surprised. The funniest part is, this is the best they have. They wanted dirt, they've got a semantic argument about what "approved" means.

On its surface that looks somewhat bad - as the statement from the deposition appears to contradict Vic's public tweet. Did Vic approve the GFM or...

...not to be pedantic, but doesn't "approve" relate to the process of GFM getting the approval to proceed from Vic, whereas they are asking about...

Whoa, it's almost like Nick has been almost spot on with what would happen at literally every step of the way.

Right? I did not expect to find that little gem. I almost didn't bother to read the second page, since it was mostly the same kind of response all...

BHBH might be able to question her, yes. If her affidavit is relevant to the case, they have reason to bring her in. This goes for anyone with an...

Yea, I don't know how this is a lie. "Approving" something means that he finds it acceptable. No permission is talked about in Vic's February...