US House committee advances kids’ online safety and privacy proposals

(Original| (Archive.is didn't work)
The House Energy and Commerce Committee advanced a package of bills Thursday that would establish national age verification requirements and create new online safety and privacy protections for children.

Lawmakers voted 28-24, along party lines, to send the Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act to the House floor for a full vote.

Republicans brushed aside Democratic opposition during the markup. Democrats argued the bill was too lenient on tech companies and would preempt any state regulations.

Senate versions of the Kids Online Safety Act and the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act, known as COPPA 2.0, have bipartisan support, in contrast with the Republican-led House effort.

The committee spent more than two hours debating amendments that Democrats said were needed to strengthen the bill, none of which passed.

“In the past, we have shown that when the stakes are high enough, we can put politics aside and work together, and that is why it is unfortunate the slate of bills today before us is not bipartisan,” Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) said in his opening remarks. “But at the end of the day, members of Congress, our responsibility is to our constituents, especially our children.”

Guthrie’s KIDS Act combines about a dozen bills focused on product design standards intended to protect children online, as well as requiring age verification for adult content. It includes the latest version of KOSA.

Democrats and kids’ safety advocates argue the House version of KOSA is weaker than its Senate counterpart because it omits “duty of care” language that would require companies to design products with kids’ safety in mind.

“We want something better, stronger, something that is really relevant to the children that have been lost,” said Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.).

The package would create new safety settings for children’s accounts, mandatory disclosure for AI chatbots, age verification requirements for sexual material, and directs federal agencies to study social media’s mental health impact.
 
6:30pm i guess is the vote they are at resscess right now.


1782770587053.png 1782771030110.png
dems say day one 2029 agena is kosa
Democrats trying to lay policy groundwork for the 2028 presidential race are rolling out their first major policy proposal: a framework for online child safety.

Known as “Project 2029,” the liberal group was formed as a counterweight to the conservative Project 2025 to write a policy agenda for the next Democratic presidential nominee. The group reckons starting with online internet safety — which has widespread Democratic support — will help galvanize the party to address what it calls this generation’s “tobacco moment.”

The “Kids Over Clicks” proposal calls for narrowing protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act that shield platforms from some liability. Among other items, the group wants to clarify that companies aren’t protected from lawsuits stemming from AI-generated content, paid ads, illegal content or activity, and platforms that promote stalking or other nonconsensual behavior.

The group is hoping the plans will pick up traction among what is expected to be a crowded field of Democratic presidential candidates heading into 2028.


“We’re going to see many people running for president … and we want to set the standard in terms of the type of ambition that we want to see when it comes to solving these problems,” said Chad Maisel, a former adviser to President Joe Biden and Democratic Sen. Cory Booker who now serves as Project 2029’s executive director.

The proposal also advocates for banning social media accounts for kids under 16 years old, adopting stronger default privacy protections, designing safer internet platforms, banning cell phones in schools (with exceptions), pushing for a smartphone-free childhood until age 14, banning surveillance advertising, and limiting data collection on children.

Project 2029 wanted to start with kids safety because it’s among the least politically polarizing topics, but plans to release policy agendas centered on issues including healthcare, housing, AI, and the border.

“Most high-profile political issues are already coded and claimed by one party or the other. Kids’ online safety is the exception,” said Rishi Bharwani, US Director for Reset Tech and a contributor to Project 2029 who helped prepare the framework. “The next president has the ability to run on these issues and enter the White House with a clear mandate for action and a day-one policy blueprint that they can coalesce congressional leaders around.”

Title iconKnow More
US lawmakers from both parties have had little success in reining in tech companies over the last few decades, whether on data privacy, monopolistic behavior, social media, or child controls. Current internet safety proposals in front of Congress are limping along, while countries from Australia to China implement online child safety laws.

With that in mind, a number of the Project 2029 proposals are designed to be enacted without congressional approval, using the presidential bully pulpit to do things like call for a phone-free childhood.


“We are at the ‘tobacco moment’ for social media. The science is in, the lawsuits are succeeding, and public support is overwhelming. This agenda gives policymakers no excuse not to act,” said social psychologist Jonathan Haidt.

Haidt is among a number of prominent supporters of the framework, including New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill, President of the American Federation of Teachers Randi Weingarten, and Booker, a potential 2028 presidential candidate.

“This blueprint offers several serious ideas for how to rein in these harmful practices, promote more responsible technology, and better protect kids online,” Booker told Semafor in a statement.

For its part, one of the ways the teacher’s union will be assessing which candidates to throw its support behind will be internet safety. “It’s really important that Democratic candidates embrace kids’ safety, because I think that is the vehicle by which you can gauge support for presidential candidates,” Weingarten told Semafor.


Project 2029 proposals are likely to go down in Washington like a lead balloon — at least right now, as the party focuses on the midterms. Along with an extended slate of Democratic presidential candidates, there’s also likely to be a deluge of policy proposals from outside groups as campaigns ramp up and candidates jockey for ideological lanes to differentiate themselves from the rest of the pack.

But right now one of the knocks on Democrats (and former Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris) is the lack of policy heft to signal to voters what they actually stand for.

What made Project 2025 stand out among the many conservative policy proposals circulating before the 2024 election was its breadth and ambition on policies that even some Republicans thought went too far. But many of its authors ended up in top positions in the Trump administration anyway and ended up implementing many of its provisions.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
If the dems ban under 16 y/os online, how will the groomers get their victims?

I assume this is either virtue signaling or there will be carveouts for discord and roblox.

Or the ban won't fucking work. Like in Aussie land.
 
I know it has nothing to do with protecting kids but what are they actually using your ID's for? Do they just want to sell your info? AI data training? Government spying? All the above?
Imagine you click ‘post’ on a comment saying: “We need to get rid of the niggers, they commit hugely disproportionate amounts of crime, mostly against White people, and are a net loss for the country”

Then in real time you watch the comment appear in the thread as: “We need to protect and provide more resources for our marginalised friends of colour, without them this country would be far worse off”

This happens to every other comment in the thread that is like yours, coming from other people, until you think that you are totally alone in your beliefs and everyone else thinks the same as each other, so you ultimately fall in line with the manufactured consensus.

Then you hear a buzz from the intercom of your bugpod and it’s the local ‘community relations enforcers’, because your I.D was linked to your post, informing you never to try to post anything like that again and as a warning your monthly bug protein quotient has been halved and your government-issued self-driving transportation vehicle will have its range and available destinations restricted for the next eight weeks.

You thank them and close the hatch to your pod, as you lay down on your government-issued rest facilitator and gaze out of the A4-sized window - a benefit afforded to you by local management for strong Q2 productivity quotas - you see the facade of the adjacent bughive, a huge 3D image of Mamdami (President for Life) beams down, grinning, eyes vacant, always grinning…
IMG_1214.jpeg
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole