- Dołączono
- 9 Sie 2022
The Body Keeps The Score, Atomic Habits, and The Road.
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
I've been reading Crime & Punishment by Dostoevsky. I kept failing out of college because of drinking so I never read a lot of classics. I'm surprised at how similar our current speech patterns relate to Russians in the 1860's. I'm in ACT 4 and still have no idea why he killed them.
Currently reading The Brothers Karamazov. I started it to coincide with a Lent challenge on the Hallow app however I didn’t care much for what they were doing. I’m still reading and enjoying the work but no longer paying attention to their daily videos. I’m coming to The Brothers after having read Poor Folk and The Gambler last summer. I bounced off of it a few years ago when I attempted it directly following Crime and Punishment, probably that was just too much Dostoyevsky at once. This time I thought I’d start with a few bite sized Dostoyevsky works before diving in.
It’s been a while but if I recall correctly Raskolnikov rationalizes killing his land lady in a few ways all stemming from his belief that he is an exceptional person and the rules simply don’t apply to such people as he. He can flout conventional morality just like a Napoleonic figure would. From this belief in his superiority he is able to rationalize the killing of Alyona through a utilitarian lens. Essentially that he, as an exceptional person but also a broken boi, would do much more good with the money than his “louse” of a land lady.
Of course that’s just how he rationalizes it to himself. The reader must also consider his financial desperation and general depression as motivations for such a violent outburst.
What translation are you using? I read the Constance Garnett translation and found it a bit Victorian. Especially when compared to the translation of The Brothers Karamazov I’m reading, done by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky.
I started Hyperion a while back, and found the concepts intriguing but the prose, characters and story telling structure were so flat and lifeless I gave up. Does it get any better?Hyperion by Dan Simmons. This one has been on my list for a while and I finally decided to read it following the author’s recent death. Finished Hyperion and am about 25% of the way through The Fall of Hyperion.
Without giving too much away, the first book is structured like a sci-fi version of The Canterbury Tales, with a group of pilgrims sharing their stories as they set out on their (rather morbid) pilgrimage to the planet Hyperion. Their stories & motivations for undertaking the pilgrimage are all very different, but often intersect in interesting ways. Hyperion is the site of an ancient spacetime anomaly called the Time Tombs, which are believed by some to be inhabited by a creature called the Shrike. The premise didn’t really spark my interest much when I read the back cover, but it’s more interesting than it sounds imo
Overall I’ve enjoyed the series a lot so far. There’s a lot of technobabble that gets easier to decipher over time, but if you don’t like sci fi you probably won’t like this one.
I read Hyperion waaaaaaay back in grade school but never went to the rest of the series. You think the rest is worth picking up again?Hyperion by Dan Simmons. This one has been on my list for a while and I finally decided to read it following the author’s recent death. Finished Hyperion and am about 25% of the way through The Fall of Hyperion.
Without giving too much away, the first book is structured like a sci-fi version of The Canterbury Tales, with a group of pilgrims sharing their stories as they set out on their (rather morbid) pilgrimage to the planet Hyperion. Their stories & motivations for undertaking the pilgrimage are all very different, but often intersect in interesting ways. Hyperion is the site of an ancient spacetime anomaly called the Time Tombs, which are believed by some to be inhabited by a creature called the Shrike. The premise didn’t really spark my interest much when I read the back cover, but it’s more interesting than it sounds imo
Overall I’ve enjoyed the series a lot so far. There’s a lot of technobabble that gets easier to decipher over time, but if you don’t like sci fi you probably won’t like this one.
If you interested in unique historical interpretations of the Odyssey and Iliad, might I humbly suggest The Origin of Consciousness In the Break Down of the Bicameral Mind by Julian Jaynes. It's a personal favorite of mine, and it's nothing if not unique.If you find some good ones, be sure to share them, I intend to re-read the two Greek and read the one Roman work at some point in my life, and I'm frankly more interested in the historical analysis that can be drawn from them than in anything else.
Admirable persistence. I thought I'd try it as a little popcorn read before the movie comes out but I didn't even make it all the way through the excerpt meetnewbooks has:Still working through Project Hail Mary, which I told myself I was going to finish before my IRL book club's meeting about it last week. Oops. Anyway, it's a quick read but given that it's Andy Weir it has its reddit moments.
I can see where you’re coming from tbh. I think it does get better, maybe around the midpoint, but perhaps not enough to warrant revisiting it if you were turned off before. There are some parts that felt ridiculous to me even after I was fully invested in the story.I started Hyperion a while back, and found the concepts intriguing but the prose, characters and story telling structure were so flat and lifeless I gave up. Does it get any better?
I’m not far enough into the sequel to reach a firm conclusion, but it’s solid. There are some interesting twists in terms of character motivation, and the shorter chapters make it feel more readable in bursts. While I liked the first one and have enjoyed the sequel so far, I’d say it’s still a tier or two beneath my favorites in the genre (Wolfe, Vance, Herbert, and to a lesser extent Asimov).I read Hyperion waaaaaaay back in grade school but never went to the rest of the series. You think the rest is worth picking up again?
The sex scenes in that book scarred me as a young lad
I liked Gravity's Rainbow but Finnegans Wake did the whole "circular structure" thing better. Everyone thinks they're too good for Joyce now, but everyone used to rip all of his best ideas off for decades.I disagree and put them on the same level, but whatever you can about Delany personally, this is a top-tier novel. It is not easy, it is weird, crazy and perverse, but its prose style is absolutely magnificent.
And a couple of quotes from Dionysius and Plutarhch about Aristodemus the Queen:It was Rome’s great good fortune that soon afterward the king of Clusium, continuing his aggression against neighbors, suffered a decisive (and historical) defeat near the Latin town of Aricia at the hands of the Latin League, a federation of Latin city-states, with help from the powerful Greek foundation of Cumae, then under the eccentric but highly effective rule of an effeminate despot who first made his name as a male prostitute, Aristodemus the Queen. Porsenna was killed in the battle, and any threat he posed vanished with him.
he ordered the boys to wear their hair long like the girls, to adorn it with flowers, to keep it curled and to bind up the tresses with hair-nets, to wear embroidered robes that reached down to their feet, and, over these, thin and soft mantles, and to pass their lives in the shade.
Following upon this, he made himself despot, and in the ways in which he misconducted himself towards women and free-born youth he surpassed his former record for viciousness. In fact it is recorded in history that he imposed on boys the custom of wearing long hair and golden ornaments, and the girls he compelled to bob their hair and to wear boy's clothes and the short undergarment.