- Dołączono
- 15 Sie 2024
TDS at its finest.
It is the evil Orange Clown, so creating misinformation about the ENEMY is totally ok.
4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC and LOLCOW, LLC, d/b/a KIWI FARMS, Plaintiffs, v. THE UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, a/k/a OFCOM
- Twórca wątku WelperHelper99
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC v. UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS 1:25-cv-02880 — District Court, District of Columbia
-
- Docket No.
- 1:25-cv-02880
-
- Court
- District Court, District of Columbia
-
- Filed
- 26 Sie 2025
-
- Nature of Suit
- 440 Civil Rights: Other
-
- Cause
- 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
-
- Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
-
- Jury Demand
- None
-
- Last Filing
- 15 Sty 2026
Parties (3)
- Parties
- UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS, LOLCOW, LLC, 4CHAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT LLC
Recent Filings (showing 5 of 31)
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 15 Sty 2026 | REPLY to opposition to motion re 8 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 01/16/2026) | 1 2 |
| — | 1 Sty 2026 | ||
| — | 1 Sty 2026 | Set/Reset Deadlines: Replies due by 1/19/2026. (tj) | |
| — | 31 Gru 2025 | ||
| — | 31 Gru 2025 | MINUTE ORDER granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant shall file its Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before January 19, 2026. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 1/1/2026. (lcrc2) |
It is the evil Orange Clown, so creating misinformation about the ENEMY is totally ok.
woduqu
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 7 Maj 2024
I haven't watched the BBC documentary, but just at face value, it doesn't make much sense that people would waste time, let alone risk their jobs, deceptively editing a person to make them say something if there was already an unambiguous unaltered recording of them saying the very same thing, right?
- Dołączono
- 21 Lis 2020
You do know that the first B stands for "British" right?
Same "British" that houses Ofcom.
- Dołączono
- 27 Lut 2019
As long as it's somebody the media doesn't like, they could do literally everything claimed and the media would still edit it deceptively just to try and make him seem even more evil. Always assume a journalist is an arrogant malcontent with a god complex.
They know their audience pretty much only gets their news from the BBC or other liberal news. They know that if their documentary helped tip the scales and prevented Trump from becoming president that he wouldn't have the ability to challenge them on this.
Obviously they were wrong, and now they're reaping what they sowed.
- Dołączono
- 12 Gru 2022
Reakcje:
x 8 x 3 x 3
x 8 x 3 x 3
- Dołączono
- 18 Sty 2023
Not a big fan of Lunduke personally
ECF 5: NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Kelsey Kry on behalf of UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 11/18/2025)
ECF 6: MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, 3 Errata by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kry, Robert) (Entered: 11/18/2025)
ECF 5: NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Kelsey Kry on behalf of UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS (Kry, Robert) (Entered: 11/18/2025)
ECF 6: MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, 3 Errata by UK OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kry, Robert) (Entered: 11/18/2025)
- Dołączono
- 2 Sie 2021
Is this a slight against us or the court?
- Dołączono
- 11 Maj 2019
"Ofcom is a UK public regulatory authority and has substantial grounds for seeking dismissal of this lawsuit based on sovereign immunity."
Yes.
Sovereign Immunity.
Ya know. That thing that makes it so OFCOM cannot fine or punish US citizens or corporations doing business in the US....BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY!!!
Yes.
Sovereign Immunity.
Ya know. That thing that makes it so OFCOM cannot fine or punish US citizens or corporations doing business in the US....BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY!!!
- Dołączono
- 12 Gru 2022
PUSSIES! Just respond instead of asking for two weeks! Stop running you cowards!
- Dołączono
- 14 Lis 2012
do private companies usually have sovereign immunity?
- Dołączono
- 18 Lip 2017
Well, they didnt cheap out that is for sure. Mololamken Looks like a very expensive and well connected DC firm. They also apparently run a summit in London to discuss the intersection of UK and US law.
- Dołączono
- 12 Gru 2022
No sir. They don't. Ofcom is once again deciding whether it is or isn't a government org depending on outcome.
- Dołączono
- 28 Gru 2014
This bullshit operation is a private company when it wants to be and a government agency when it wants sovereign immunity.
Nuke the United Cuckdom. We have already had this war once and they lost.
Private Tag Reporter
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 7 Lip 2024
Personally, I say we re-litigate this the 1776 way, but that's just me. KIWIFARMS VS. THE UNITED KINGDOM (A WAR).
- Dołączono
- 21 Lis 2020
Just drop some leaflets "You will never be a woman."
Shortest war ever.
- Dołączono
- 22 Maj 2022
"That category" meaning "unopposed requests." It's suggesting to the Court that opposing counsel, those big meanies, should have stipulated to the extension request.
- Dołączono
- 10 Lip 2017
Hilariously OFCOM's actions if they are in fact a UK Government Agency and subject to Sovereign Immunity could well be taken as a Violation of the Treaty of Paris of 1783. Round up the Fifes and Drums! We March at Dawn!
- Dołączono
- 5 Sie 2022
- Dołączono
- 14 Lis 2022