Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    4 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
RUSS PAID FILING FEE

Screenshot_20250521_234015_Firefox.webp
 
It'll probably be dismissed but that doesn't mean the fun will end.
I bet that "State of Nevada vs. Russell Greer" will be the next case for our favorite Tard se.
NRS 86.263  Filing requirements; fees; notice; regulations.

10.  A person who files with the Secretary of State a list required by subsection 1 or 2 which identifies a manager or managing member with the fraudulent intent of concealing the identity of any person or persons exercising the power or authority of a manager or managing member in furtherance of any unlawful conduct is subject to the penalty set forth in NRS 225.084.

NRS 225.084  Civil liability for filing record which is forged or fraudulently altered, contains false statement of material fact or is being filed in bad faith or to harass or defraud; rights, remedies and penalties cumulative; regulations.

1.  A person shall not willfully file, promote the filing of, or cause to be filed, or attempt or conspire to file, promote the filing of, or cause to be filed, any record in the Office of the Secretary of State if the person has actual knowledge that the record:

(a) Is forged or fraudulently altered;

(b) Contains a false statement of material fact; or

(c) Is being filed in bad faith or for the purpose of harassing or defrauding any person.

2.  Any person who violates this section is liable in a civil action brought pursuant to this section for:

(a) Actual damages caused by each separate violation of this section or $10,000 for each separate violation of this section, whichever is greater;

(b) All costs of bringing and maintaining the action, including investigative expenses and fees for expert witnesses;

(c) Reasonable attorney’s fees; and

(d) Any punitive damages that the facts may warrant.

3.  A civil action may be brought pursuant to this section by:

(a) Any person who is damaged by a violation of this section, including, without limitation, any person who is damaged as the result of an action taken in reliance on a record filed in violation of this section; or

(b) The Attorney General, in the name of the State of Nevada, if the matter is referred to the Attorney General by the Secretary of State and if the Attorney General, after due inquiry, determines that a civil action should be brought pursuant to this section. Any money recovered by the Attorney General pursuant to this paragraph, after deducting all costs and expenses incurred by the Attorney General and the Secretary of State to investigate and act upon the violation, must be deposited in the State General Fund.

4.  For the purposes of this section, each filing of a single record that constitutes a violation of this section shall be deemed to be a separate violation.

5.  The rights, remedies and penalties provided pursuant to this section are cumulative and do not abrogate and are in addition to any other rights, remedies and penalties that may exist at law or in equity, including, without limitation, any criminal penalty that may be imposed pursuant to NRS 205.397 or 239.330.

NRS 205.397  False representation concerning lien against property of public officer or employee, candidate for public office or participant in official proceeding or member of immediate family of such persons; penalties; civil action.

1.  A person shall not file, register or record, or present for filing, registration or recording, in any public office, a lien or other encumbrance against the real or personal property of a public officer, candidate for public office, public employee or participant in an official proceeding, or a member of the immediate family of a public officer, candidate for public office, public employee or participant, which is based on the performance of or failure to perform a duty relating to the office, employment or participation by the public officer, candidate for public office, public employee or participant if the person knows or has reason to know that the lien or encumbrance:

(a) Is forged or fraudulently altered;

(b) Contains a false statement of material fact;

NRS 239.300  Stealing, altering or defacing records, documents or instruments.  A person who:

1.  Steals, embezzles, corrupts, alters, withdraws, falsifies or avoids any record, process, charter, gift, grant, conveyance, bond or contract;

is guilty of a category C felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.

NRS 193.130  Categories and punishment of felonies.

1.  Except when a person is convicted of a category A felony, and except as otherwise provided by specific statute, a person convicted of a felony shall be sentenced to a minimum term and a maximum term of imprisonment which must be within the limits prescribed by the applicable statute, unless the statute in force at the time of commission of the felony prescribed a different penalty. The minimum term of imprisonment that may be imposed must not exceed 40 percent of the maximum term imposed.

(c) A category C felony is a felony for which a court shall sentence a convicted person to imprisonment in the state prison for a minimum term of not less than 1 year and a maximum term of not more than 5 years. In addition to any other penalty, the court may impose a fine of not more than $10,000, unless a greater fine is authorized or required by statute.
 
I just grabbed the Nevada Secretary Of State form for an LLC application. It does not require the signature of every named individual just the one at the top.

But there is this fun little note:
Wyświetl załącznik 7392288
I'm a little curious why it hit the system with an obvious lie like "W. H." I expect Mr. Hardin or someone has requested the actual filing documents.

I'm almost certain you're not allowed to use initials when listing managing members, which would put the business out of compliance with requirements.

Hopefully Hardin or someone that can bring him information, reading this thread, there is a ton of new information from just one weekend that he should probably review.

Ha, I was right. Crusty Rusty could be facing a felony charge for what he did.
 
So now the case continues....if he hadn't paid the fee, would the case have been dropped entirely, giving Greer an easy out? IS there even a way for Greer to make a smooth exit from here? Surely given his behavior and the surmounting evidence against him, a smooth exit would be his best strategy now. My question is, is he continuing this case out of his own pocket out of fear of it being dropped will all fees falling on his head, or is he continuing it believing he may actually get what he wants?
 
So now the case continues....if he hadn't paid the fee, would the case have been dropped entirely, giving Greer an easy out? IS there even a way for Greer to make a smooth exit from here? Sure given his behavior and the surmounting evidence against him, a smooth exit would be his best strategy now. My question is, is he continuing this case out of his own pocket out of fear of it being dropped will all fees falling on his head, or is he continuing it believing he may actually get what he wants?
There are still a number of motions to dismiss and sanctions on the table. Hardin has I think another week or two to respond regarding one of them. The Judge or Judges are probably waiting for those before ruling on all of them.

But here's the kicker. Paying the fee prevents an immediate automatic dismissal. On the question is the Plaintiff currently IFP. But since that ruling it has come out that he has been paying Filing Fees to other courts in other cases going back 3-4 years. While claiming IFP status in this one. That should be a statutorially required dismissal. The Judges don't actually have a choice there. The law is "Shall be Dismissed". And there really is no valid argument for claiming IFP in the Federal Court, while paying fees at the same time to State Courts for Hooker related lawsuits.
 
That should be a statutorially required dismissal. The Judges don't actually have a choice there. The law is "Shall be Dismissed".

We can keep saying that here, but at some point Hardin needs to put this in a very short motion, with no other distractions or considerations or clever words, and say, "It's time."

My favorite part is that he went out of his way to add a footnote to make it clear how he was doing Russ a massive favor by making it only 1000 to begin with. Sounds like he realizes he fucked up.

Speaking of which, new poll request: Will Greer make a new filing of some sort, probably a Supplemental Authority, informing District Judge Barlow that ACKCHUALLY, he only has to pay $774.24 or whatever retarded math number he came up with to Null?
* Yes
* No
* IRRELEVANT TO COPYRIGHT
 
So now the case continues....if he hadn't paid the fee, would the case have been dropped entirely, giving Greer an easy out? IS there even a way for Greer to make a smooth exit from here? Surely given his behavior and the surmounting evidence against him, a smooth exit would be his best strategy now. My question is, is he continuing this case out of his own pocket out of fear of it being dropped will all fees falling on his head, or is he continuing it believing he may actually get what he wants?
Whether he stayed or left, he still has to pay sanctions.
Null got the biggest tip he's ever handed to someone
This money goes to the court
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole