Odpowiedzi na post #6 259

@Kipersonapiscesotter explained what the deferment line meant like 5 mins after the docs dropped. That's his big win? It was common knowledge here...

The typographical error isn't relevant. Everybody understands it means "if". But Nick appears to be replacing "may" with "will" and a "regardless"...

That's a pretty significant error. Dani didn't even notice the complaint/compliant part. How does this work exactly? He's currently on probation...

Nick's ITT.

Lets hope he goes on Youtube saying there are typographical errors and the judgement doesn't really means what the words say. The judge will...

One small detail is different than the original order given by the judge. He's crying about watermarks again.