Odpowiedzi na post #3 769

Being against sexual depictions of children (real or fictional) should be the kind of thing people stand for on basic moral principle. It's wrong...

even autists have the self-awareness to know how immoral loli/shota is, but the ones that are really deep in the spectrum are typically too far...

For as much as people bang on this drum, I've never seen anyone make "Libertarian" arguments for CSAM before. You can't call it a victimless crime...