Odpowiedzi na post #922

Very low. The short layman version is "Enough evidence that a reasonable person would believe something illegal is happening".

It's not a high bar. Higher than reasonable suspicion but that's not saying much. One issue here is that it's just not as sharp a standard as...

It's low enough and the standard of review is deferential enough that there basically has to be either a serious and obvious procedural defect in...

the bar is "the totality of the circumstances" would lead a reasonable person to believe X, according to Illinois vs. Gates (1983). much less than...