Odpowiedzi na post #73 539

Correct, but since the judge in the case already said what Nick said was defamation per se, a trial doesn't look good for Nick.

Yup! The big reason this was an L was how much money Nick has likely thrown away (to Randazza) to pursue an esoteric (and now twice losing) legal...

Losing this appeal means that Nick will not be able to attempt anti-SLAPP in the case and the case will not be done according to Colorado law. I...

He hasn’t lost, but his statements have already been ruled defamation per se. The appeal was trying to apply Colorado Anti-SLAPP because...

Nick wanted the case dismissed. The case now goes to discovery. Nick, after referring to discovery as the most expensive part of the case, now...