Chris-Chan incest leak / Chris has been removed from 14 Branchland Court

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
BUILT FOR CWC
 

Załączniki

  • download (1).jpg
    download (1).jpg
    6,1 KB · Wyświetlenia: 94
I’ve seen a lot of stuff online but the IDEA of this is so much worse.
a mentally ill lunatic raped his elderly dementia afflicted mother. I can’t even make a joke about this in good conscious.
I really hope it’s not true
 
This shit has convinced me that all the hippy shit about past lives is correct. There is nothing that Bob could have possibly done to deserve this kind of shit outside of being Albert Fish in a past life. This kind of thing happening to a person is on the same wavelength of likelihood as some kid on Xbox Live saying he's fucking your mom and you demanding hot pockets only to see that kid teabagging both your mom and your character in Halo 3. Bob must have been a real jerk in a past life.
Alternatively Bob was saved from witnessing any of this insanity or seeing what would become of the child he tried to protect and provide for.
 
God can you imagine the poor medic who has to perform Barbs examination? I feel so bad for them.
Imagine a porter wheeling in barb to a nurses office with a public servant in tow. The porter hands the clipboard to the nurse.
The nurse asks the public servant:

"So uh, what am I doing here?"
"We need you to scrape tranny retard cum out of a haunted 80 year olds pussy because we believe a fat retard has been sexually abusing his dementia-addled mother."
this seriously made me laugh thank you also horrified… fuck you but thank you but fuck you
 
When Chris uploaded his video screaming about My Little Pony a few days ago, I remember thinking "This is classic Chris kino, can't wait to see what he does next!"
but fucking hell I didn't expect this
 
Is insanity a valid defense against incest in the State of Virginia?
According to the Code of Virginia:

"§ 19.2-303.6. Deferred disposition in a criminal case; persons with autism or intellectual disabilities.​

A. In any criminal case, except a violation of § 18.2-31, an act of violence as defined in § 19.2-297.1, or any crime for which a deferred disposition is provided for by statute, upon a plea of guilty, or after a plea of not guilty, and the facts found by the court would justify a finding of guilt, the court may, if the defendant has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist with (i) an autism spectrum disorder as defined in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association or (ii) an intellectual disability as defined in § 37.2-100 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the criminal conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the person's disorder or disability, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of the accused, after giving due consideration to the position of the attorney for the Commonwealth and the views of the victim, defer further proceedings and place the accused on probation subject to terms and conditions set by the court. Upon violation of a term or condition, the court may enter an adjudication of guilt; or upon fulfillment of the terms and conditions, the court may discharge the person and dismiss the proceedings against him without an adjudication of guilt. This section shall not limit the authority of any juvenile and domestic relations court granted to it in Title 16.1."
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole