Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)
- Twórca wątku Borscht
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Dołączono
- 24 Paź 2020
Dark Edea
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 20 Lip 2020
I don't want to pay for this. I don't even have health insurance, why the fuck should I bankroll healthcare for more foreigners? We already subsidize the European welfare state and those fucks mock us all the time. Now I have to buy a fake vaccine shot for a bunch of moisture farmers in Africa?
Fuck that.
- Dołączono
- 17 Gru 2019
Wonder how big the check those pharmafucks cut Biden for this one? How many of those doses are gonna be stolen and sold back to the people living in corrupt 3rd world governments worldwide? Even if it is legit, the pharmacunts still get to sell the next booster six months down the line if these people wanna be "protected", like all drug peddlers the first taste is free after all. Fuckin A, is this how the world really operates or am I just a pessimistic fuck?
- Dołączono
- 16 Mar 2019
The only thing I have to say to anyone using "birthing people" is YWNBAW.
- Dołączono
- 24 Paź 2020
- Dołączono
- 17 Gru 2019
Yes, in theory, it could really be Her Turn if you went through that process; as I mentioned, Ford became president in a similar way. If you want to take the process to the extreme, you could have the office of the presidency rotate constantly if you kept having the president resign, replacing them with the VP and nominating another VP in their place. Ridiculous, but possible under our succession system.
But the optics of installing Queen Hillary through such a process would be terrible. Kamala is an unlikable cunt, but Hillary is only marginally better since she can at least pretend to hide her seething contempt for the common man some of the time. To give her the presidency in a backdoor manner would cause plenty of outrage, and it's not unlikely she'd get buried in the following election. I don't think her ego could stand such a thing. There's also the fact that the new VP has to be confirmed by a majority of both chambers of Congress, and with a 50/50 split in the Senate and Kamala no longer able to act as a tiebreaker (since that's the VP's job and she'd be president at that point), Republicans could easily stand in her way, barring interference from RINOs.
Plus, if Kamala didn't actually want to be a victim of Arkancide, she'd know better than to let Hillary get within one life of the presidency.
- Dołączono
- 12 Lis 2019
- Dołączono
- 24 Paź 2020
- Dołączono
- 12 Lis 2019
- Dołączono
- 19 Lut 2018
Following election? You assume she'd survive the three way civil war that would be touched off instantly.
The histronic 'progressive' wing of the Democrats are already in a cold war with the establishment neolibs, and Kamala 'suiciding' or resigning to give Hillary the presidency over a proud POC would send them into a blood frenzy. As for the Republicans, well the writing is on the wall then, the theories of the Deep State wanting revenge for 2016 and cheating Trump out of 2020 are all true and the upper echelons of the government are proven traitors as far as they are concerned.
Take your bets on what happens first- radical Marxists assassinate some Congress critters as every major Democrat city burns to the ground in massive riots and looting or a state governor declares the Clinton administration to be illegitimate and musters their state's National Guard to forcibly expel every Fedboi in their borders.
- Dołączono
- 24 Paź 2020
Billy Beer
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 23 Kwi 2021
That's a good angle to play when Biden and Kamala have been dragged through the mud for being useless cunts.
Both sides like Surfer, so she would easily get accepted to the role. It would probably garuntee a landslide for Dems in 2024 if Trump doesn't win, or Trump endorses her.
You've got to be fucking kidding me. Three country tour...of Europe? Fuck me, there are four countries in the UK alone. Some tour
I was discussing the election with some american lefties back in october and november 2020. I said, "What happens if the guy you're voting for turns out worse than Trump?" The answer: "we don't care, he isn't Trump"
"OK", i said, "What about 6 months down the line when the TDS has left your body and you're looking for someone to blame for all of the fuck ups? You can't blame Trump, or republicans or evil nazi's, because none of them are in the white house"
"It'll be good to get a sane, rational and coherent professional president in the white house. I'm not bothered about the rest"
We're seeing buyers remorse on a mass-scale and it's awesome. These people were warned, told and explained to what was going to happen, but their ego was so great, they did it anyway.
Biden 'winning' (it was rigged) the election is the personification of cutting your nose off to spite your face.
They must have someone lined up, even for protocols sake, even if it's a well-kept secret, because i cannot see Biden making 4 years as pres, nor Kamala getting the party over the line to 2024.
That answers the age old question of who will win between muslims vs LGBTQ
Muslims.
______________________________________________________________________________________
A quick thought on election rigging: Blue anon and the like; online shills who spread the good word of Biden and Hillary, are known about. They're out in the open doing their thing and everyone knows about it.
Where's the republican equivalent? Qanon? Because we saw how that went.
Radical Cadre
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 12 Mar 2020
I also keep forgetting that he's the President.
- Dołączono
- 24 Paź 2020
- Dołączono
- 24 Mar 2019
You're not under any illusions that they are going to be treated the same, I trust?
- Dołączono
- 16 Gru 2019
Biden looks like he won't even get the 70% vaccinated rate in the US by July, and he's just going to throw vaccines out to everyone in the world. His handlers are absolutely stupid in trying to make him shift to the world's president when he's failed so much at home already.
And with Hydroxochloroquin being proven right again, and the protestors in Lafeyeete Square being removed by the DC Mayor in order for a fence to be constructed, Trump keeps getting W's. So much is being written for his 2024 campaign already Biden better hope all he does in meeting with other leaders is just fall down and not just completely cave to China and Russia, if he's even allowed to do open meetings with the time zones affecting his sundowning.
And with Hydroxochloroquin being proven right again, and the protestors in Lafeyeete Square being removed by the DC Mayor in order for a fence to be constructed, Trump keeps getting W's. So much is being written for his 2024 campaign already Biden better hope all he does in meeting with other leaders is just fall down and not just completely cave to China and Russia, if he's even allowed to do open meetings with the time zones affecting his sundowning.
- Dołączono
- 26 Lis 2018
Democrat voters are absolutely fucking retarded and deserve to get everything they vote for. I just wish I didn't have to live with it as well.
Garm
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 5 Cze 2019
Bahahahaha.
Fuck, I can't move this quote around. Anyway, for a man with so much experience in government, Biden seems dead set on isolating us from our allies.
Ukraine's Zelensky "confused," "disappointed" by Biden not trying to block Russia pipeline
The Ukrainian president says Nord Stream 2 will hurt Kyiv.www.axios.com
Looks like the Biden regime threw yet another "ally" under the bus. Astrologists predict two weeks of Zelensky crying about "muh Russian pipeline" and possibly more leaks of Joe's Ukrainian affairs.
At the end, looks like Joe ended up being in bed with Putin a lot more than Trump ever did. Hey Joe, what does Russian dick taste like?
I'm going to be honest, the bar I set for this administration was pretty much "buried beneath the frost line in the ground." And some how they keep screwing that up. So I can only be impressed by the dogged tenacity to fuck up.
Eventually they'll just be Axlotl Tanks.
Axlotl Tanks
The Axlotl tanks or Axolotl tanks were living organisms within the Original Dune series. Axlotl technology is also mentioned, but not elaborated upon, in Frank Herbert's novels Destination: Void and the The Jesus Incident. Axlotl tanks are the means by which the Bene Tleilax reproduce a living...
- Dołączono
- 13 Wrz 2018
Democrats: "We love our muslims, oh they're so cool, oh they're so sweet"
- Dołączono
- 12 Lis 2019
WASHINGTON – According to a new watchdog report, police didn’t clear Lafayette Park of protesters on June 1, 2020 so President Donald Trump could have a “photo op,” as the mainstream media reported at the time — police had already planned to clear the area to install new fencing.
Read the report from The Interior Department’s inspector general:
At the request of then Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior David Bernhardt and Members of Congress, we reviewed the actions the U.S. Park Police (USPP) took to disperse protesters in and around Lafayette Park in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2020. Our review focused on events that occurred in and around the park from May 29 through June 3 amid the ongoing Black Lives Matter protests. We sought to describe what occurred primarily from an operational perspective, including how and when the USPP, in coordination with its law enforcement partners, developed and executed its plan to clear the park and the USPP’s reasons for dispersing protesters from the area. We also sought to determine whether the warnings the USPP provided to protesters before it executed the plan complied with applicable guidance. We did not review as part of this project individual uses of force by USPP officers; these actions are the subject of separate inquiries or ongoing lawsuits.
Protests began in and around Lafayette Park on May 29, 2020. On May 30, the USPP and U.S. Secret Service established a unified command to coordinate the law enforcement response to the protests. From May 30 to 31, at least 49 USPP officers were injured while policing the protests, and Federal and private property was vandalized.
On the morning of June 1, the Secret Service procured antiscale fencing to establish a more secure perimeter around Lafayette Park that was to be delivered and installed that same day. The USPP, in coordination with the Secret Service, determined that it was necessary to clear protesters from the area in and around the park to enable the contractor’s employees to safely install the fence. The USPP planned to implement the operation as soon as the fencing materials and sufficient law enforcement officers arrived at the park. Six other law enforcement agencies assisted the USPP and the Secret Service in the operation to clear and secure areas near the park.
The operation began at 6:23 p.m. and was completed by 6:50 p.m. Shortly thereafter, at 7:01 p.m., President Trump walked from the White House through Lafayette Park to St. John’s Church. At 7:30 p.m., the contractor began assembling and installing the antiscale fence and completed the work by approximately 12:30 a.m. on June 2.
We found that the USPP had the authority and discretion to clear Lafayette Park and the surrounding areas on June 1. The evidence we obtained did not support a finding that the USPP cleared the park to allow the President to survey the damage and walk to St. John’s Church. Instead, the evidence we reviewed showed that the USPP cleared the park to allow the contractor to safely install the antiscale fencing in response to destruction of property and injury to officers occurring on May 30 and 31. Further, the evidence showed that the USPP did not know about the President’s potential movement until mid- to late afternoon on June 1—hours after it had begun developing its operational plan and the fencing contractor had arrived in the park.
We also found that although the USPP used a sound-amplifying long-range acoustic device to issue three dispersal warnings to the crowd on June 1, not everyone could hear the warnings. Furthermore, we found that the USPP does not have a detailed dispersal warning policy applicable to operations like the one that occurred on June 1 and that this may have led to the ineffective warnings issued to the crowd that day.
Finally, we found that the USPP and the Secret Service did not use a shared radio channel to communicate, that the USPP primarily conveyed information orally to assisting law enforcement entities, that an assisting law enforcement entity arrived late and may not have received a full briefing on the rules of engagement, and that several law enforcement officers could not clearly hear the incident commander’s dispersal warnings. These weaknesses in communication and coordination may have contributed to confusion during the operation and the use of tactics that appeared inconsistent with the incident commander’s operational plan.
Given the lack of a specific policy, we recommend that the USPP develop a detailed policy for protests and other events of the type that occurred on June 1 and improve its field communication procedures to better manage multiagency operations.
Read the report from The Interior Department’s inspector general:
At the request of then Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior David Bernhardt and Members of Congress, we reviewed the actions the U.S. Park Police (USPP) took to disperse protesters in and around Lafayette Park in Washington, DC, on June 1, 2020. Our review focused on events that occurred in and around the park from May 29 through June 3 amid the ongoing Black Lives Matter protests. We sought to describe what occurred primarily from an operational perspective, including how and when the USPP, in coordination with its law enforcement partners, developed and executed its plan to clear the park and the USPP’s reasons for dispersing protesters from the area. We also sought to determine whether the warnings the USPP provided to protesters before it executed the plan complied with applicable guidance. We did not review as part of this project individual uses of force by USPP officers; these actions are the subject of separate inquiries or ongoing lawsuits.
Protests began in and around Lafayette Park on May 29, 2020. On May 30, the USPP and U.S. Secret Service established a unified command to coordinate the law enforcement response to the protests. From May 30 to 31, at least 49 USPP officers were injured while policing the protests, and Federal and private property was vandalized.
On the morning of June 1, the Secret Service procured antiscale fencing to establish a more secure perimeter around Lafayette Park that was to be delivered and installed that same day. The USPP, in coordination with the Secret Service, determined that it was necessary to clear protesters from the area in and around the park to enable the contractor’s employees to safely install the fence. The USPP planned to implement the operation as soon as the fencing materials and sufficient law enforcement officers arrived at the park. Six other law enforcement agencies assisted the USPP and the Secret Service in the operation to clear and secure areas near the park.
The operation began at 6:23 p.m. and was completed by 6:50 p.m. Shortly thereafter, at 7:01 p.m., President Trump walked from the White House through Lafayette Park to St. John’s Church. At 7:30 p.m., the contractor began assembling and installing the antiscale fence and completed the work by approximately 12:30 a.m. on June 2.
We found that the USPP had the authority and discretion to clear Lafayette Park and the surrounding areas on June 1. The evidence we obtained did not support a finding that the USPP cleared the park to allow the President to survey the damage and walk to St. John’s Church. Instead, the evidence we reviewed showed that the USPP cleared the park to allow the contractor to safely install the antiscale fencing in response to destruction of property and injury to officers occurring on May 30 and 31. Further, the evidence showed that the USPP did not know about the President’s potential movement until mid- to late afternoon on June 1—hours after it had begun developing its operational plan and the fencing contractor had arrived in the park.
We also found that although the USPP used a sound-amplifying long-range acoustic device to issue three dispersal warnings to the crowd on June 1, not everyone could hear the warnings. Furthermore, we found that the USPP does not have a detailed dispersal warning policy applicable to operations like the one that occurred on June 1 and that this may have led to the ineffective warnings issued to the crowd that day.
Finally, we found that the USPP and the Secret Service did not use a shared radio channel to communicate, that the USPP primarily conveyed information orally to assisting law enforcement entities, that an assisting law enforcement entity arrived late and may not have received a full briefing on the rules of engagement, and that several law enforcement officers could not clearly hear the incident commander’s dispersal warnings. These weaknesses in communication and coordination may have contributed to confusion during the operation and the use of tactics that appeared inconsistent with the incident commander’s operational plan.
Given the lack of a specific policy, we recommend that the USPP develop a detailed policy for protests and other events of the type that occurred on June 1 and improve its field communication procedures to better manage multiagency operations.
- Status