1. This thread will be deleted since all you can do is incriminate yourselves.
No. You cannot cite a law that this threat is in violation of.
. Alan Dershowitz
Tony Robbins
Harvey Weinstein
Donald Trump
Donald Trump Jr
Will be writing me checks for the harassment
1. We do not fit the harassment definition as in 16-11-39.1 and in caselaw.
2. 16-11-39.1 (e) protects us
3. You cannot bring this case against us, as Harassment is a criminal matter that civil courts have no jurisdiction over.(Linda R. S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614 (1973) ).
3. 3-year protective orders on all of them.
Protective orders are (almost always) unconstitutional, and infamously hard to aquire (Freedman v. Maryland, 380 U.S. 51 (1965) ) due to extremely high requirments (Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305 (1982) )
The reason you'll write me chacks is that you don't want to be charged for harassment, threats, and sexual harassment.
You can't charge us with the first, we are protected under 395 U.S. 444 for the second, and the same as the first for the third. You cannot bring criminal actions against us, only the government can (Linda R. S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614 (1973) )
Didn't you say you already did?
I'll let you all post some more. I have work to do.
Sure you do. I'm sure we'll see you again soon. (Edit, I was right)
You know whal, Alan....you're absolutely right.
Not, Alan, but, of course I'm right. I back up my claims after all.
Alan, poor Alan. This isn't the United States of Alan Dershowitz who can threaten people then cry about someone's hyperbolic post.
There is a language that is legal, and language that can establish bad faith in bringing suit. It's not my fault you can't seem to understand the difference. Read Hughes v. Benjamin (1:17-cv-06493), it will help you understand.
Which post is criminal, Alan, My David and Goliath post or Tony Robbins rape post? We're all ears. Go ahead.
Where have I called your post "criminal"? I'd ask you to show me, but I haven't, so you can't.