💥 Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Maw]

So, it's been established.
@Useful_Mistake is Alan Dershowitz.
He is using a hate thread on a hate website to harass a Harvey accuser.
He continues to hack and search out personal information on a Harvey accuser.
He suffers from the appearance of narcissistic personality disorder.
And he continues to catfish as other people to hide his identity
He is "advocating for Donald Trump who is @Maw account.

I bet you wish your dick was as large, huh?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

No you just informed the court that you have money to pay in the event of losing a lawsuit. You're also stupid.

1. I am not Alan.
2. I did not inform the court of anything.
3. You do not know my financial situation (but I do know yours).
4. Woman that is unable to answer simple basic questions is accusing someone else of stupidity. Pot Kettle?
5. You have no case against me, nor do you have one against Alan.

So, it's been established.
@Useful_Mistake is Alan Dershowitz.

News to me given that I denied being Alan pretty much every single time.

He is using a hate thread on a hate website to harass a Harvey accuser.

Factually false.

He continues to hack

Factually false

and search out personal information

All your information is on public records. And despite you thinking it's illegal, looking up information, private or no, is not illegal as long as you aquire that information lawfully.

on a Harvey accuser.

You keep mentioning that, as if it means something.

He suffers from the appearance of narcissistic personality disorder.

Factually false.

And he continues to catfish as other people to hide his identity

Factually false. I have never catfished anyone.

He is "advocating for Donald Trump who is @Maw account.

Is that supposed to be illegal(it's not)? But, no, Maw is not Trump, As for the "advocating for Trump" citation, I'd like to see you back that up. I don't believe I made my political opinions on Trump known on this thread.

Wyświetl załącznik 2120772

What the fuck is that supposed to be?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

1. I am not Alan.
2. I did not inform the court of anything.
3. You do not know my financial situation (but I do know yours).
4. Woman that is unable to answer simple basic questions is accusing someone else of stupidity. Pot Kettle?
5. You have no case against me, nor do you have one against Alan.

News to me given that I denied being Alan pretty much every single time.

Factually false.

Factually false

All your information is on public records. And despite you thinking it's illegal, looking up information, private or no, is not illegal as long as you aquire that information lawfully.

You keep mentioning that, as if it means something.

Factually false.

Factually false. I have never catfished anyone.

Is that supposed to be illegal(it's not)? But, no, Maw is not Trump, As for the "advocating for Trump" citation, I'd like to see you back that up. I don't believe I made my political opinions on Trump known on this thread.

What the fuck is that supposed to be?

Tucker Carlson stick with whining on Faux News.. Thanks for taking over though, Dershowitz was about admit to kidnapping the Limburgh baby.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Tucker Carlson stick with whining on Faux News.. Thanks for taking over though, Dershowitz was about admit to kidnapping the Limburgh baby.

Oh, I'm Tucker now? Tucker's cool, I guess.
So, anyway, who the fuck is the "limburgh baby" and why do you think Alan had kidnapped it? Oh, btw, that's defamation per se in Georgia (Grayson v. Savannah News-Press, Inc., 139 S.E.2d 347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964) ), so you just gave Alan a cause of action against you.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Oh, I'm Tucker now? Tucker's cool, I guess.
So, anyway, who the fuck is the "limburgh baby" and why do you think Alan had kidnapped it? Oh, btw, that's defamation per se in Georgia (Grayson v. Savannah News-Press, Inc., 139 S.E.2d 347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964) ), so you just gave Alan a cause of action against you.

Ok. I'll be waiting.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Ok. I'll be waiting.

So, since we are talking about lawsuits, when are you suing me as you promised?

 

[DocHoliday1977]

So, since we are talking about lawsuits, when are you suing me as you promised?Wyświetl załącznik 2120939

Are you wanting a lawsuit? You sound like you want one. Only the most unprofessional lawyer sicko would get on a website like this and harass Harvey accusers.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Are you wanting a lawsuit? You sound like you want one.

You said you are suing me. I'm just asking the details.

Only the most unprofessional lawyer sicko would get on a website like this and harass Harvey accusers.

Again, you keep throwing around "harvey accusers" as if it's some magical word that will win you everything in life. It's meaningless. It won't help you in your lawsuit against alan, and it won't help you in general

 

[DocHoliday1977]

You said you are suing me. I'm just asking the details.

Again, you keep throwing around "harvey accusers" as if it's some magical word that will win you everything in life. It's meaningless. It won't help you in your lawsuit against alan, and it won't help you in general

The Harvey name is in the thread title.


Excuse me, in the first post of this thread.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Excuse me, in the first post of this thread.

True, but only as far as it relates to you. This thread is not about Harvey, it's about you. And constantly mentioning that you are accusing him doesn't help you win against us here, nor has it helped you win in court.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Really.

 

[Cup Noodle]

Oh, I'm Tucker now? Tucker's cool, I guess.
So, anyway, who the fuck is the "limburgh baby" and why do you think Alan had kidnapped it? Oh, btw, that's defamation per se in Georgia (Grayson v. Savannah News-Press, Inc., 139 S.E.2d 347 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964) ), so you just gave Alan a cause of action against you.

She is referring to Charles Lindbergh Jr. the infant son of Charles Lindbergh who was the first person to make a solo flight across the Atlantic. The baby was kidnapped and a ransom note sent. The baby was later found dead in the woods near the Lindbergh home. The child was kidnapped six years before Alan was born and the kidnapper was eventually found and took a ride on 'ol sparkey so Pam is patently wrong.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Jesus please, what the hell.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Really.
Wyświetl załącznik 2121133

Yes, thank you for proving me right.

The child was kidnapped six years before Alan was born and the kidnapper was eventually found and took a ride on 'ol sparkey so Pam is patently wrong.

Clearly Alan used a Weinstein-funded time machine.

Jesus please, what the hell.
Wyświetl załącznik 2121148
Wyświetl załącznik 2121149

Why are you posting emails from 2019 by a poster that can't even write well? Also, why did you tag it as "business emails"?

 

[Cup Noodle]

I just came across some great advice from a catgirl that applies to Pam.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Yes, thank you for proving me right.

Clearly Alan used a Weinstein-funded time machine.

Why are you posting emails from 2019 by a poster that can't even write well? Also, why did you tag it as "business emails"?

I am not going to respond to you again except to say the more you can't stop harassing that looks bad on you.

Have a great day.

 

[Kurple Pecleon]

I am not going to respond to you again

Promises, promises.

except to say the more you can't stop harassing that looks bad on you.

Parnalia, this how English no works. Parnalia write no English know. Parnalia learn English how speak.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

harassing

This is not harassment by the legal definition. Harassment is intended to cause fear not annoyance or anything else (United States v. Robert Eckhardt, 05-12211 (11th Cir. 2006)

You continue to talk to us, and even attempt to mock us. No court would hold that as you being "in fear" due to "harassing communications"

If we are using you as an example, harassment requires installation of fear, and fear cannot be presumed (reasonably) where the 'victim' has stated to be not only enjoying herself, but also attempts to attack the 'attackers'

Not one that is for the purpose of "harassing, molesting, threatening, or intimidating" (16-11-39.1 (a) (1)). This also does not apply to "constitutionally protected speech" (16-11-39.1 (e)). Harassment also requires intent to instill fear (United States v. Robert Eckhardt, 05-12211 (11th Cir. 2006)), which there is none, and you have multiple times pointed out that you are not afraid of us, even going as far as claiming you fear nothing.
Based on my analysis I can conclude that this is not harassment.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

I just came across some great advice from a catgirl that applies to Pam.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=kJoQkV4opp4

I don't care what disgusting thing you do.

 

[LoverofPi]

Alan. You really don't know how bad you suck at all this. You crave the spotlight. And you do the same thing over and over and over. I'm going to take your blatant retarded patterns of behavior and weaknesses and pop them like a blood cyst.

Pam, that's a description of you.

Does this look like a courtroom and am I on a damn witness stand? Are that delusional and demented in your daily life you think kiwifarms is a courtroom....and on top of that, you're questioning gon DETAILS OF MY WEBSITE. Something not in any way affiliated with anything pertinent to the Harvey discussion? What is your problem? Are you forgetting to take your dementia medicine? You have no authority over me at all. You don't and you never will.

Thank you for confirming your new twitter account, Pam.

This thread hasn't been about Harvey for the last 20 or so pages. This thread is about you, and therefore, all information about you is relevant, including your website.

This is not and has never been a thread about Weinstein, even. He's only relevant to the thread because Pam is obsessed with him.