Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

1619053177704.png
 
I just... men have to go to big and tall stores too, you stuck up bitch. Hell, I have to shop at one for some clothing.
Not just a you problem. There are women out there who have to wear size 16 girls clothes as they are sized out of being able to wear clothes made for women because of lardbeasts like the women in the tweet.
 

A similar statistic came up in the UK. It might even be true - it’s just that three times more than a very small number is still a very small number.

Our based black equalities minister Kemi Badenoch said as much when she mentioned that efforts in hospitals to stop these deaths from happening end up running into difficulty because the deaths they are trying so hard to prevent are already so rare.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Google has some bad words:


black-boxAvoid using black-box, blackbox, or black box to describe monitoring and testing.

Black FridayAvoid unless explicitly referring to an event in the US. Instead use peak scale event.

blackhat, black hat, black-hatDon't use. Instead, use precise terms for the kind of violation or practice, such as illegal, unethical, or in violation of rules.

blackhole (verb), blackholed (adjective)Don't use. Instead, use a more descriptive term or phrase, such as dropped without notification.

blacklist, black list, black-listDon't use blacklist, whitelist, and graylist.

Avoid using blind writes. Instead, use a more precise phrase, such as a write operation without a read operation.

build cop, build sheriffDon't use. Instead, use a more precise term like build monitor.

chubbyDon't use. Instead, use a word that clearly explains what you mean, such as unused or overextended.

crazy, bonkers, mad, lunatic, insane, loonyDon't use. Instead, use complicated, complex, baffling, strange, or unexpected, and only for inanimate objects.crippleDon't use. Instead, use more precise language. For example, instead of it crippled the server, write it slowed the server down.When referring to people, use terms that specifically describe a physical impairment, such as person with a motor disability; person with a mobility impairment (refers to walking or moving about); person with dexterity impairment (refers to using a standard mouse or keyboard); person who uses a wheelchair, walker, or cane; wheelchair user; person with restricted or limited mobility.

demilitarized zone (DMZ)Don't use. Instead, use a more precise term like perimeter network.

disableDon't use disabled to describe something that's broken.

dumb downDon't use. Instead, use a word or phrase what's happening, such as simplify or remove technical jargon.

easy, easilyWhat might be easy for you might not be easy for others. Try eliminating this word from the sentence because usually the same meaning can be conveyed without it.

fatDon't use. Instead, use a precise modifier that conveys the appropriate meaning. For example, use high-capacity network connection instead of fat connection or full-featured client instead of fat client.Instead of using fat in a negative sense, such as trim the fat, refer in a more concrete manner to the removal of unused items.

female adapterDon't use. Instead, use a genderless word like socket.

first-class, first-class citizen, first classDon't use socially-charged terms for technical concepts where possible. Instead, consider terms such as core feature, built-in, top-level.

gender-neutral he, him, or his (or she or her)Don't use. Instead, use the singular they (see Jane Austen and other famous authors violate what everyone learned in their English class).

ghettoDon't use. Instead use more precise terms like clumsy, workaround, or inelegant to refer to code that isn't in a production-ready state.

gimp, gimpyDon't use. Use precise, non-figurative language to refer to a deficiency in a component.

grandfatheredDon't use

guys, you guysWhen referring to a group of people use non-gendered language, such as everyone or folks.

gypsyDon't use. To refer to the people, use Romani, Roma, or Traveller, as appropriate for the specific group you're referring to.

hang, hungDon't use to refer to a computer or system that is not responding. Instead, use stop responding or not responding. For more information, see Avoid unnecessarily violent language.

hitDon't use as a synonym for click, press, or type.

killAvoid when possible. Instead, use words like stop, exit, cancel, or end.

lameDon't use. Use precise, non-figurative language to refer a deficiency in a component.

male-adapterDon't use. Instead, use a genderless word like plug.man hours, manhours, man-hoursAvoid using gendered terms. Instead use terms like person hours.man-in-the-middle (MITM)Avoid using gendered terms. Instead use terms like on-path attacker, person-in-the-middle (PITM).

manmade, man madeAvoid using gendered terms. Instead use a word like artificial, manufactured, or synthetic.mannedAvoid using gendered terms. Instead use terms like staffed or crewed.manpower, man power, man-powerAvoid using gendered terms. Instead use terms like staff or workforce.

masterUse with caution. Never use in conjunction with slave.

monkey, monkey testDon't use monkey to refer to people. When referring to tests, refer to the specific function, for example, automated, random tests.

nativeAvoid using native to refer to people. When referring to software products, try to use a more precise term—for example, use built-in to describe a feature that's part of a product.

ninjaDon't use to refer to a person. Instead, use a term such as expert.

nukeDon't use. Instead use remove or attack.

postmortemAvoid in general usage. Instead, use retrospective.

preferred pronounsDon't use. Use pronouns instead.

primitiveUse with caution. Don't use primitive in a disparaging sense.

quick, quicklyWhat might be quick for you might not be quick for others.

retardedDon't use. If you are referring to a system or component being slowed, use the word slowed.

saneDon't use. Instead use a word like valid or sensible.sanity checkDon't use. Instead, use a term like quick check, confidence check, preliminary check or coherence check.

sexyDon't use. Instead, use precise, positive words, such as fast, powerful, or elegant.

slice and diceAvoid the phrase slice and dice.

STONITH, STOMITHAvoid using graphically violent terms. This acronym's letters stand for an extremely graphic and violent act. Instead, explain the relevant feature, such as fence failed nodes.

tarballDon't use.

tribal knowledge, tribal wisdomDon't use. Instead, use a less figurative term to indicate knowledge held by a group of people.

voodooDon't use. Instead, use a term like mysterious, complicated, or nondeterministic.

war room, warroom, war-roomDon't use.

white glove, white-glove, whitegloveAvoid using.

whitehat, white hat, white-hatDon't use. Instead, use precise terms for the kind of compliance, such as legal, ethical, or following the rules.
Where's that 4chan post about using things like "Google" and "Skype" to replace banned words?
 
A similar statistic came up in the UK. It might even be true - it’s just that three times more than a very small number is still a very small number.

Our based black equalities minister Keri Badenocb said as much when she mentioned that efforts in hospitals to stop such a these deaths from happening end up running into difficulty because the deaths they are trying so hard to prevent are already so rare.
The people that make these kind of posts have no interest in doing anything about it, nor in the details. So UK SJWs happily use US stats and vice versa, with no regard to relevance. So probably they stole that.

As far as the UK stats go, they are caused by an insane level of geriatric pregnancy in African (as in born in Africa) women. The risk of maternal death for say a 30 year old woman is tiny, but at 45 many times higher

Also the African women might well have had previous shitty pregnancies where they get some kind of back-street c-section, had female circumcision and so on.

If you compare actual born-in-Britain black women with white women on an age-adjusted basis there's no difference, but these dickheads are more interested in saying 'doctors racist reeeeeeee' then noticing that the doctors and nurses are mostly not white themselves....
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I mean its so fucking weird this shit happen now
Lots of radfems have had issues with BDSM for a long while, at least since the 90s, probably since inception. It's their whole sex-negative thing where they shit on libfems for thinking being violently gangbanged in front of your parents is empowering, but as usual radfems always end up taking it further and you'll usually end up down a rabbit hole with a lot of them where ultimately all sex with a penis is rape or something. They always bring up good points about some issues with abuse in the BDSM community and yadayada yada, but they end up with the stories like "My dad rented me out as a BDSM prostitute for all his friends since I was 11 and convinced me it was feminism, therefore I am betrayed by liberal feminism and know that radical feminism is the only way." I'm not exagerrating about that one - it's a shame I didn't know about the farms while Gendercritical reddit was still up, because there were some hilariously insane posts I saw. Gotta dig through Ovarit for the terf thread, they've been getting nuttier since that Atlantic article brought in more members.
 
Have any you guys heard wind of radfems going after bsdm?
They always bring up good points about some issues with abuse in the BDSM community and yadayada yada, but they end up with the stories like "My dad rented me out as a BDSM prostitute for all his friends since I was 11 and convinced me it was feminism, therefore I am betrayed by liberal feminism and know that radical feminism is the only way." I'm not exagerrating about that one
Holy fuck, is it that hard for them to understand some people like it rough? I managed to explain that shit to my sex-repulsed sister, but arguing with radfems is like yelling at socks to gather.

The ONLY upside 50 shades popularity had is that radfems probably had to admit that women would do that willingly. And even then I doubt they believe, because holy crap, that story is worse than any I heard.
 
Holy fuck, is it that hard for them to understand some people like it rough? I managed to explain that shit to my sex-repulsed sister, but arguing with radfems is like yelling at socks to gather.

The ONLY upside 50 shades popularity had is that radfems probably had to admit that women would do that willingly. And even then I doubt they believe, because holy crap, that story is worse than any I heard.
It's more that radfems think all forms of BDSM has the woman as the sub and that BDSM is nothing but an excuse for men to brutalize/dominate women sexually.

These types freeze up and sputter like a computer hit with a logic bomb when you remind them that shit like DOMINATRIXES exist and that women domming men is a big thing in the BDSM community. Let alone the rather large gay male element of the BDSM community, which is so large that it is it's own separate ecosystem parallel to the straight version of the BDSM community.
 
A similar statistic came up in the UK. It might even be true - it’s just that three times more than a very small number is still a very small number.

Our based black equalities minister Keri Badenoch said as much when she mentioned that efforts in hospitals to stop these deaths from happening end up running into difficulty because the deaths they are trying so hard to prevent are already so rare.
Kemi.

For those who are mildly curious about the stuff behind it here's the Guardian article I suspect being referenced;


As someone already posted up thread some of the stuff behind it I won't add that. I will note for anyone who did not bother watching video she claimed 1 in 4 black women die in childbirth in the UK. Despite allegedly recanting the video where she says it is still up on her Twitter (about a minute before the end of the video);


As Kemi corrected her it's not 1 in 4. It's 0.034%. I notice the Labour MP has also made other tweets talking about different 1 in 4 numbers since, almost like she's trying to hide that muck up.
 
It's more that radfems think all forms of BDSM has the woman as the sub and that BDSM is nothing but an excuse for men to brutalize/dominate women sexually.

These types freeze up and sputter like a computer hit with a logic bomb when you remind them that shit like DOMINATRIXES exist and that women domming men is a big thing in the BDSM community. Let alone the rather large gay male element of the BDSM community, which is so large that it is it's own separate ecosystem parallel to the straight version of the BDSM community.
They'll tell you that ANY form of BDSM "upholds Patriarchy", because society views submission as a feminine trait, and dominance as a masculine trait, and therefore the "standard Patriarchal norms are still being upheld when a woman tops a man, reeeeee!"

No, I'm not kidding, I've been told that at least twice, by different idiot feminists.

Speaking of idiot feminists, crosspost from the tranny sideshows thread -
Wyświetl załącznik 2108943

The American Humanist Association is rescinding an award they gave to Dawkins in 1996, because he dared to question trans orthodoxy. Someone post that "You have 10 seconds to give her a reason why she's not transracial, that I can't use against you." comic.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
A similar statistic came up in the UK. It might even be true - it’s just that three times more than a very small number is still a very small number.

Our based black equalities minister Kemi Badenoch said as much when she mentioned that efforts in hospitals to stop these deaths from happening end up running into difficulty because the deaths they are trying so hard to prevent are already so rare.
If you actually read the study it finds that black women are more likely to die than white women who are more likely to die than hispanic women.

The later part never gets mentioned.
 
If you actually read the study it finds that black women are more likely to die than white women who are more likely to die than hispanic women.

The later part never gets mentioned.

They only care about a statistic when it enforces their narrative. White men are ten times more likely to get killed by the police than black women. But no one’s brave enough to take the mic from BLM and say this is a men’s issue.
 
They'll tell you that ANY form of BDSM "upholds Patriarchy", because society views submission as a feminine trait, and dominance as a masculine trait, and therefore the "standard Patriarchal norms are still being upheld when a woman tops a man, reeeeee!"

No, I'm not kidding, I've been told that at least twice, by different idiot feminists.
Then it is good old liberal crap of "natural things ars actually all result of propaganda" that should be disregarded immediately.
 
Wyświetl załącznik 2107701
From my Alma Mater, apparently blacks are connected to a hive mind that causes them to be traumatised whenever something terrible happens to a black person anywhere on Earth and the university is racist for not acknowledging and proactively supporting their special needs.

Must be nice to have had the tribalism beaten (sometimes literally) out of us Whites, so we aren't cursed with the same level of in-group empathy. We'd be perpetually stunlocked by the trauma of all of the anti-white bullshit that fills the news we see, like /pol/ tards but even whinier.
Hate to say it as a student myself, but that's on them. Trust me, I've been there. Professors want their assignments rain, sleet or shine.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole