The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Głosy: 75 7,6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Głosy: 397 40,0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Głosy: 221 22,3%
  • Mistrial

    Głosy: 299 30,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    992
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Yeah but 9 minutes and 29 seconds, did we mention he can't sneed? 9 minutes and 29 seconds.
EXHIBIT 17.
Exhibit 17.gif
 
I was really hoping Nelson would bring one hell of a closing argument, and so far I have not been disappointed. I'm still behind, but I'm still pretty impressed. Much better reasoned than Prosecution's strategy of disingenuously appealing to emotion that comes off with the authenticity of a da Vinci photocopy. I can see the argument being built up piece by piece, and the mad lad is front-loading his argument with state witness testimony. This is quite a show.
 
1618859223242.png

If DOGE has taught me anything, it's that retard strats are the most viable ones in Clown World. I'm going all in, baby.
 
Does longer answer go "no, he can't" or "no, that would be bad idea"?

TL;DR - It's basically the reason why you can almost never sue someone for defamation. Chauvin would have to prove that the prosecution was illegal and not just political or incompetent.

One of the biggest challenges in malicious prosecution cases based on the filing of criminal charges is prosecutor immunity. State and federal laws give prosecutors and other law enforcement employees immunity from liability for malicious prosecution. This immunity is meant to protect prosecutors and law enforcement so they can do their job without constantly having to defend against accusations of malicious prosecution. The concern is that every person who claims innocence might try to sue the prosecutor for wrongful prosecution.
 
I was really hoping Nelson would bring one hell of a closing argument, and so far I have not been disappointed. I'm still behind, but I'm still pretty impressed. Much better reasoned than Prosecution's strategy of disingenuously appealing to emotion that comes off with the authenticity of a da Vinci photocopy. I can see the argument being built up piece by piece, and the mad lad is front-loading his argument with state witness testimony. This is quite a show.
We may get the full desired yield of wailing and gnashing of teeth from ReddiTwittroons after all.
maxresdefault-3.jpg
 
>this thing started wars and dictatoships
>fucked south america so bad they still havent recovered
>was the cause of the riots last year
Banana? More like CHADnana banana.jpg
 
From what I gather, Mr. Nelson is a somewhat prominent lawyer in the Minneapolis area. Does anybody know who's paying his fee? and about how much he's getting paid to represent Chauvin?
The police union or something is paying for this. I'm not sure what the rate is.

I'm wondering if the union would cover appeals as well?

 
Rebuttal: "Yea just to reiterate, none of that shit matters, just remember how you felt the first time you saw the worst part of the vid and sentence this nigga to fry"
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole