The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

[TLEN]

how is the defense supposed to rebut potato nigger without him

Challenge him to a sneeding contest.

 

[Special Agent Punchy]

Let’s get this show on the road, I got my sneed pants on and everything.

 

[brap_connoiseur_420]

Mistrial hasn't been declared yet, but Tobin mentioned some forbidden evidence, and within 2 minutes rebuttal was finished and Cahill started a 3 hour break.

It's absolutely fucking happening lads! Cahill stated that even a HINT to the new evidence would result in a mistrial.

 

[CharlesBarkley]

Starting to think the order came from the very top that this guy cant walk

The biden admin already has to deal with still putting kids on cages while even more mexicans pour into the border because thats what fucking happens when you elect an open borders geriatric, imagine if they also have to deal with chauvin walking free

Its been clear for a while that the whole thing was blown out of proportion to fuck trump over, not that I care but that leaves some nasty side-effects like the fact that now the cop that you branded "worst than hitler" will be proven not guilty under your government, not trump's, and now biden and cop-mala have to deal with it........or take a massive shit on their country's legal system which would create even more consequences

Guess again. Biden doesn't give a fuck either way and the riots are going to happen regardless of what occurs due to the media storm not having Trump anymore and resorting to hate crime clicks. Daunte Wright is enough for them.

Either way, the blue liberal cities are fucked regardless of this trial outcome. It doesn't even matter and every single fucking person knows it. If anything, a win for the defense would possibly distract from other Biden issues (Such as the border crisis) because people nonstop will just be posting about BLM instead of focusing on real important government policy.

 

[Banditotron]

From my own experience his O2 saturation was probably literally like 10% initially from not breathing for so long. With the standard "lifesaving measures" you can get an essentially corpse's O2 sat up while everything else is fucked.

Doesn't the heart need to beat in order to distribute that O2, though?

 

[itskaon]

Mistrial hasn't been declared yet, but Tobin mentioned some forbidden evidence, and within 2 minutes rebuttal was finished and Cahill started a 3 hour break.

so if you present "forbidden evidence" that automatically makes it a mistrial? but what if it was a mistake?

 

[Ruin]

Mistrial doesn't guarantee he walks though, can't they just retry him?

 

[Dan Abrams]

Doesn't the heart need to beat in order to distribute that O2, though?

Yes, iirc in the ambulance they had the lucas device on him (auto CPR) and then he got more CPR in the hospital. Saying that well look his O2 was 98% and that's good is like how the cardiologist said look his blood pressure was 200 so his heart was strong and cardiomegaly in response to said high blood pressure and drug abuse is normal.

 

[MoeChotto]

so if you present "forbidden evidence" that automatically makes it a mistrial? but what if it was a mistake?

Cahill stated in this morning hearing that any hint to this particular evidence that the jury would not be seeing would result in a mistrial. Period.

No mistrial. They're going forward. Damn.

 

[itskaon]

Cahill stated in this morning hearing that any hint to this particular evidence that the jury would not be seeing would result in a mistrial. Period.

im retarded pls be slow but Tobin said that GF had "98% oxygen saturation" what does that mean?

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

Pretty sure that's exactly what the Judge told them NOT to do.. HOLY SHIT!!

What did he say?

 

[CharlesBarkley]

so if you present "forbidden evidence" that automatically makes it a mistrial? but what if it was a mistake?

If you are making mistakes like that in a trial of this magnitude, you might be the biggest retard on the planet.

 

[Dr. Ricearoni]

so if you present "forbidden evidence" that automatically makes it a mistrial? but what if it was a mistake?

Well I think that's part of what makes it a mistrial. That wasn't supposed to happen and now its tainted. Also it looks like we're back and we haven't mistrialed? So there's that answered.

 

[Top Skink]

BACK IN SESSION BAYBEE

(RIP the break)

 

[ShapelyMutton]

It was "quarter to" not "quarter to two" when he called a break. You retards got me hyped

 

[DumDum Did Nothing Wrong]

Mistrial doesn't guarantee he walks though, can't they just retry him?

Only on a hung jury I think

 

[briantheblessed]

If you are making mistakes like that in a trial of this magnitude, you might be the biggest retard on the planet.

already confirmed when he said sticking cigarettes' up your butt is the only guaranteed way to live to 115

 

[brap_connoiseur_420]

so if you present "forbidden evidence" that automatically makes it a mistrial? but what if it was a mistake?

Willingly or unwillingly, the jury being exposed to the 'new evidence' would still be grounds for a mistrial because you can't erase the jury's memory.

 

[Aldeland]

If you are making mistakes like that in a trial of this magnitude, you might be the biggest retard on the planet.

Imagine fucking a trial up like this when you're the attorney general.

 

[DiabeticSP]

Cahill stated in this morning hearing that any hint to this particular evidence that the jury would not be seeing would result in a mistrial. Period.

No mistrial. They're going forward. Damn.

But he mentioned it what the fuck.
"Mention this its a mistrial"
"You mentioned it but its not a mistrial"