🐱 Why Men Are Left Out of the Sex Positivity Movement

CatParty

I want everyone to be included in the sex positivity movement. I know this may be difficult for some cis-hetero men to believe, particularly those who complain of feeling “attacked” by women and queer folx, but I think there should be space in sex positivity for one and all. Unfortunately, while the sex positivity movement is theoretically for everyone, it has been predominantly populated by women and sexual minorities. This, according to Dr. Justin Lehmiller, an expert for adult retailer Lovehoney and author of the book Tell Me What You Want, is largely due to the fact that sex positivity is rooted in anti-patriarchy. As Lehmiller explains, “Any time there is a re-centering of power, those who previously held the most power are often resistant to change.”

Both the sex positivity movement and culture as a whole suffer from this rift. But first, we should begin by defining what sex positivity actually is — and what it isn’t. Being sex positive doesn’t mean you need to go out and bang every person you see (though it can, if you want). Sex positivity is an attitude. It means viewing sex as a natural part of human existence and choosing not to judge others on their own sexual preferences, no matter what those might be. Basically, it means being down with sex, in all its forms, as long as everyone is a consenting adult. As a movement, it aims to instill these values in society as a whole. In a sex-positive world, everyone would be able to express themselves sexually, sex education would be comprehensive and inclusive, and all people (women, sexual minorities, and yes, even men) would be safe from sexually predatory behavior.

We need straight men to participate in sex positivity in an active and meaningful way. But before that can happen, we need to address one major, glaring issue — one that has a tendency to rub many of those straight, cis men the wrong way. We need to talk about toxic masculinity.

Toxic masculinity is the very reason it often feels like there is so little space for cis men among sex-positive folx. Heterosexual men have a reputation for crossing boundaries, which has conditioned women and queer folx to always be on guard in their presence, ready to fight or flee at a moment’s notice. We feel on edge.

Cis-heterosexual men don’t know what this feels like, leaving them unaware of — or perhaps simply unwilling to address or acknowledge — the inherent and often destructive power they wield over those not born into the privilege of maleness. Those people, in turn, feel the effects of that power, even when it’s not actively weaponized.

“Many men don’t feel comfortable talking about their emotions or any sexual insecurities. And because of this, they don’t want to have hard talks that address how the ways they’re behaving towards women are both harmful to women and [to] themselves,” says Zachary Zane, sex columnist and sexpert for Lovehoney. And because those men have always felt in control and safe, they don’t have to.

However, it’s harmful to men themselves to be left out of sex positivity. It alienates them and only feeds the dangerous notion that sexual minority groups and women are “against” straight men. That said, I understand why men feel this way. There is a lot of anger, resentment and fear projected onto men — not without reason, of course, but it’s pretty obvious why men feel left out of sex positivity: they are left out.

“Over the years, I’ve heard many sex-positive people say things about straight men that essentially treat them as a monolith and characterize them in pretty negative ways, such as being lazy and selfish in bed or being inherently predatory,” Lehmiller says.

I want cis-het men in the sex-positivity movement. Guys, I want you here. I want you all here. I applaud those cis men who stand up against sexist, heteronormative bullshit and fight for equality. I just wish there were more of you.

“The sex positivity movement is built on great intentions and has the potential to help all of us improve our sex lives by eliminating sexual shame, breaking barriers to sexual communication, enhancing sex education and empowering people to take control over their sexuality,” Lehmiller says. This means not leaving men out.

But how? We need avenues that may be available to men who are interested in entering the sex-positive safe space and we must do the work, collectively, to create those avenues. We need to find real, tangible ways to get men into this movement because leaving them out is causing serious damage. “Listening to women and trusting our perspectives is the best place to start. The beauty of sex positivity is there’s no one way to experience sexuality, so naturally it calls for diverse perspectives,” says Kristin Fretz, Co-founder and CMO of Emojibator, a shame-free, accessible pleasure-tech brand.

This means men need to be willing and able to work on themselves. “I think women are more open to working through their emotions, while men push them down. I think therapy is a great avenue to undo toxic masculinity,” explains Joe Vela, CEO of Emojibator.

Kenneth Play, an international sex educator and creator of the Sex Hacker Pro Series, says the easiest way into the sex positivity movement is to attend sex-positive social events, of which there are many. For instance, Play runs the sex-positive collective Hacienda House, which throws a bunch of events that all are welcome to attend. He does offer a cautious reminder to newcomers, however: “If you’ve never been to a sex-positive event and you’re a single guy, don’t go and hit on all the girls.” Instead, Play recommends making friends with the men, who will then probably be more than willing to provide introductions — and maybe even put in a good word — to the women there. Basically, be genuine and chill and you can come party with us, literally. Honestly, intentions are everything. If you’re there with good intentions and no ulterior motives, they will shine through.

As long as patriarchry prevails and toxic masculinity turns men into predators, sex positivity cannot become fully realized. Toxic masculinity is real, it’s dangerous, and the only way folks in the sex-positive community are going to be able to let our collective guards down and invite straight men to engage with us in a way that allows us to feel safe (and to be safe) is if we stop teaching men that they have a right to women’s bodies: that women are objects, that we are there to feed their desire, that they have the power and deserve to keep it.

It’s going to take a full reframing of our cultural understanding of what it is to “be a man” before change can happen. It may seem daunting, but that change can (and must) begin on a personal level. Zane says that men must be vigilant and dare to challenge the status quo. “Recognize where you can change your behavior and do better,” he says. “Call out other men who engage in shitty, toxically masculine and sex-negative behavior.” It’s the bravery to stand out in a world that praises these poisonous character traits that will shift the tides of understanding.

Men, we want you here, but some serious things need to change first.
 
It's fascinating how the only way for men to be included into the sex positivity movement is for them to behave exactly like women, and talk about their vaginal emotions and how much their feelings matter.

And how about instead of turning all of society into a female slumber party where we all sit around talking about our feelings and our periods and our male celebrity crushes, women learn to man the fuck up once in a while and stop turning into useless blubbering blobs of emotions the second a coworker doesn't sufficiently compliment their new haircut?

How about instead of turning on the womanly waterworks about the picture of the Honduran child at the border being smuggled into the country to become a sex slave and using the crying as a justification to open the border, we turn on some masculine objectivity and cost out how many these tens of millions of illegals are directly costing the country, and how much they're negatively impacting housing prices and wages.

Women, we want you in governance, but some serious things need to change first.
 
Because feminists and sjws portray any display of male sexuality as predatory and negative?

At least until they, on an individual level, realize that if enough men believe that or react to it by staying away from them, there isn't anyone left to just thrill them, the hero protagonist of the movement and only one that matters.

Rules for thee and not for me, thrills for me but not for thee.

That kind of selfish, and in most cases, militantly selfish, thinking can only end one possible way.... with the "sex positive" feminists left with nobody but each other to bone in abusive and unfulfilling ways as they try to fruitlessly convince each other that fat, sloppy, middle-age lesbian sex is what they really wanted all along .
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
They claim they want non-toxic men. They talk about how cis-men have to change into weird shadows of women.

What's the old joke?

A woman goes to a divorce lawyer after being married for nearly 30 years. She admits that she spend 30 years working on him getting rid of his bad habits, making him into a better husband and man. The lawyer asks her: Then why are you divorcing him? She answers: He's not the man I married.
 
Here's a list of words and phrases that tell me the author or person speaking doesn't have opinions worth considering (all words in quotes are assumed to be used in a serious and unironic progressive, non-satirical context.):
- Folx
- Folks (not southern)
- Y'all (not southern)
- Ya'll (not southern, incorrect spelling)
- Latinx
- Xhe
- Xir
- above two in any other alternative spelling
- "problematic"
- "toxic"
- "unpack"
- "unlearn"
- "cis"
- "non-binary" or "enby"
- "educate" (used in the sense of "you need to educate yourself" kind of context)
- "patriarchy"
- "white supremacy/supremacist" (when not referring to actual supremacists or supremacy)
- heteronormative or hetero-normative
With that out of the way...
destructive power they wield over those not born into the privilege of maleness.
And they wonder why sane people don't want a damn thing to do with them. Imagine thinking being born with a dick is a privilege. Insanity.
However, it’s harmful to men themselves to be left out of sex positivity. It alienates them and only feeds the dangerous notion that sexual minority groups and women are “against” straight men.
No not "sexual minority groups" just you self-appointed would-be spokesperson freaks.
“Over the years, I’ve heard many sex-positive people say things about straight men that essentially treat them as a monolith and characterize them in pretty negative ways,
Like this very article?
I want cis-het men in the sex-positivity movement. Guys, I want you here. I want you all here.
And I want you in Baghdad, Mecca or Istanbul but we can't always get what we want.
We need to find real, tangible ways to get men into this movement because leaving them out is causing serious damage.
Clearly it hasn't done enough damage.
Kenneth Play, an international sex educator and creator of the Sex Hacker Pro Series, says the easiest way into the sex positivity movement is to attend sex-positive social events, of which there are many. For instance, Play runs the sex-positive collective Hacienda House, which throws a bunch of events that all are welcome to attend. He does offer a cautious reminder to newcomers, however: “If you’ve never been to a sex-positive event and you’re a single guy, don’t go and hit on all the girls.” Instead, Play recommends making friends with the men, who will then probably be more than willing to provide introductions — and maybe even put in a good word — to the women there. Basically, be genuine and chill and you can come party with us, literally. Honestly, intentions are everything. If you’re there with good intentions and no ulterior motives, they will shine through.
Putting aside my cynicism and general antipathy towards this disingenuous cultish bullshit, someone should tell these people that the only kind of "cis-het male" you're going to attract with this kind of advertisement are the fucking predators. Idiots.
As long as patriarchry prevails and toxic masculinity turns men into predators, sex positivity cannot become fully realized.
"Not becoming an emotional man-bitch who's willing to be subservient so he can get in between the hairy legs of people who are unfuckable and unattractive both inside and out a few times before being lit up on social media as a predator makes you toxic".
Toxic masculinity is real
You know, nothing helps me to believe something is a real problem quite like the people making money off of it feeling the incessant need to remind me that it is definitely a real problem for sure guys every waking opportunity that they can.
It’s going to take a full reframing of our cultural understanding of what it is to “be a man” before change can happen. It may seem daunting, but that change can (and must) begin on a personal level. Zane says that men must be vigilant and dare to challenge the status quo. “Recognize where you can change your behavior and do better,” he says.
Being vigilant and daring to change the status quo would mean pushing back or at least resisting your bullshit, so I suppose I'm already making great progress. Good news for me I guess.
Men, we want you here, but some serious things need to change first.
You don't want men you want drones.
 
How about those "sex positive" people do self reflection first and show those changes they want to see cis het men do? Like stop talking shit about men and immediately call out anyone who does that. Don't allow men be left out or made to feel like outsiders. Take mens input seriously and reflect how your own toxic behavior towards them.

No? Just men change, become nice and we might include you. That's what I thought and that's why I a bi sexual woman hate your movement and will do my best that it won't be included in schools so it won't hurt kids.
 
Straight men and "sex positivity" are inherently at odds with one another. And this is actually a time when the author is using the term patriarchy correctly. Sex positivity does run counter to a patriarchal system because men need to know that a child being born is theirs in order to pass down their inheritance properly. If women aren't willing to be monogamous and chaste, then men can't trust that a child is theirs, thus they can't devote themselves to that child.

If the sex positivity movement became more monogamous, then straight men would probably not mind it so much. But they aren't. They're wanton sluts. That's not useful to straight men in any capacity, so why would they want to be part of it?
 
Well, at least I managed to make it to the word "folx" before I began to remember why giving women the right to vote was the single greatest mistake men in America have ever made
 
I'm not taking toxic masculinity seriously until they encourage positive masculinity that isn't shorthand for "simpering toolbag we can manipulate".
And I won't take the idea seriously until they actually stop clamoring for it despite talking about what they think "positive masculinity" is.

Women talking about masculinity ever is a practice that needs to die, preferably by its practitioners being shouted down unrelentingly about how they don't know a damn thing about what it takes to be a man in the first place.

...but I guess that would involve adequately developed men, and I think we're going to suffer a supply shock there for a while.
 
Kenneth Play, an international sex educator and creator of the Sex Hacker Pro Series, says the easiest way into the sex positivity movement is to attend sex-positive social events, of which there are many.
"To encourage sex positivity, men should attend orgies and have polyamorous relationships!" LMAO.

The whole "sex positivity" movement says one thing, but it actually supports something else. The hand wringing about "the poor men being left out"-- but really most of this "sex positivity" is about encouraging behaviors that men find arousing in porn they consume-- coercive anal sex, violent sex, consent-non-consent rape sex, group sex, BDSM, pedophilia, sex with no strings attached, etc. All that bizarre flowery talk they peddle eradicates concepts like personal boundaries and having empathy for one's partner in terms of the pain/discomfort they are experiencing-- or at the very least, they totally pretend that sexual violence/coercion doesn't exist.

This part right here is a joke. Notice the "there's no one way to experience sexuality" talking point again-- leaving a huge open door to encourage pedophilia acceptance. Of course, this shit is all sponsored by tech that wants to sell sex toys, apps, etc..
But how? We need avenues that may be available to men who are interested in entering the sex-positive safe space and we must do the work, collectively, to create those avenues. We need to find real, tangible ways to get men into this movement because leaving them out is causing serious damage. “Listening to women and trusting our perspectives is the best place to start. The beauty of sex positivity is there’s no one way to experience sexuality, so naturally it calls for diverse perspectives,” says Kristin Fretz, Co-founder and CMO of Emojibator, a shame-free, accessible pleasure-tech brand.
Oh... and here we go again. More pushing of the whole polyamory "lifestyle", with a little "experiment with the gay!" thing thrown in. ...
“If you’ve never been to a sex-positive event and you’re a single guy, don’t go and hit on all the girls.” Instead, Play recommends making friends with the men, who will then probably be more than willing to provide introductions — and maybe even put in a good word — to the women there. Basically, be genuine and chill and you can come party with us, literally. Honestly, intentions are everything. If you’re there with good intentions and no ulterior motives, they will shine through.
 
We're just less open to the idea of being whores than you ladies. In a few years, I think you'll understand, and you'll never forget. You're going to carry it for the rest of your life, unlike the eggs you didn't abort.
 
"To encourage sex positivity, men should attend orgies and have polyamorous relationships!" LMAO.

The whole "sex positivity" movement says one thing, but it actually supports something else. The hand wringing about "the poor men being left out"-- but really most of this "sex positivity" is about encouraging behaviors that men find arousing in porn they consume-- coercive anal sex, violent sex, consent-non-consent rape sex, group sex, BDSM, pedophilia, sex with no strings attached, etc. All that bizarre flowery talk they peddle eradicates concepts like personal boundaries and having empathy for one's partner in terms of the pain/discomfort they are experiencing-- or at the very least, they totally pretend that sexual violence/coercion doesn't exist.

This part right here is a joke. Notice the "there's no one way to experience sexuality" talking point again-- leaving a huge open door to encourage pedophilia acceptance. Of course, this shit is all sponsored by tech that wants to sell sex toys, apps, etc..
If this shit isn't literally designed to destroy the Western family unit (and even the male/female couple), it has to all be a front, in my opinion, for women who want to let their freak flags fly but don't want to be judged for doing it. ("Don't slut-shame!") As if lecturing from some humorless, dour catlady is going to stop men from being revolted by promiscuous whores who want to become the mother of their children.

I really think the "double standard" (lol, get over it, evolution isn't fair) drives them crazy because they, ultimately, see things from a female perspective and demand that the rest of the world see things that way, too. Or maybe it's just that they find it threatening that men could have preferences that they don't measure up to. The ultimate, childish narcissism.
 
It means viewing sex as a natural part of human existence and choosing not to judge others on their own sexual preferences, no matter what those might be.
Found another pedo-apologist.
1617804015341.png

If there is nothing to your existence other than COOMING and CONSOOMING, then yes, you need to be judged by others, preferably with harshness and mockery.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole