Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[Idiot savant]

its time we show some solidarity with this little southern minority.

 

[keyboredsm4shthe2nd]

They'll be screeching about this even after the nonmutilated kids grow up to be unlike David Reimer and the future Jazz Jennings' from other states are lying in a pile of blood and brain matter.

 

[Kenya Jones]

You say that like it's a bad thing

It is a bad thing.

 

[AltisticRight]

Only baizuo cucks will call mutilation "therapy".

 

[Fentanyl Floyd]

I generally have a loathing of making things felonies if it isn't absolutely necessary.

I'd say preventing children from getting groomed by mentally ill eunuchs is necessary these days.

 

[Penis Drager]

I'm a bit torn on this one. I generally have a loathing of making things felonies if it isn't absolutely necessary. It deprives individuals of too many fundamental rights in our broke-ass system, is a great political cudgel, and too many things that shouldn't be felonies currently are.

On the other hand, state and medical professional sanctioned destruction of children is also really fucked up and makes my goddamn blood boil.

I think I like the intent more than the law itself.

I think ruining someone's life based on dumb decisions they made as children is plenty reason to take your rights away.

 

[HarblMcDavid]

I'd say preventing children from getting groomed by mentally ill eunuchs is necessary these days.

I think ruining someone's life based on dumb decisions they made as children is plenty reason to take your rights away.

Y'all aren't wrong, that's why I'm so torn about it.

My primary counter is that I don't think this would even be an issue if trannies didn't have a near immunity from the consequences of anything they do. If people were allowed to criticize this stuff freely and it to trend organically, I don't think we'd have this issue. Obviously, this is a statement not about what is, but what should be, which is as useless as tits on a boar.

Another consideration, laws don't tend to get repealed when their usefulness has lapsed once passed, and that perpetually bugs me with this being no exception.

It's the probably libertarian in me screaming "no no no no no" but at the same time every ounce of institutional power is intent of destroying children with poison if they ever make indications when too young know anything about anything that they like "girl things".

 

[mr.moon1488]

The party of small government strikes again.
I don’t even really disagree with them other than I disagree with the government being involved in healthcare decisions. Blanket bans are never good.

In other aspects, I wonder what the text of the bill is and if some enterprising group could argue it bans other surgeries and treatments.

I don't really see how mutilating your children counts as a medical decision.

 

[NyQuilninja]

Nah I don't like the heat. Too many white people there anyways

Its darker in Alabama then you think

 

[Exigent Circumcisions]

Its darker in Alabama then you think.

Chinese people are basically white.

 

[NyQuilninja]

Chinese people are basically white.

 

[Hecate]

I have a couple of issues with this despite the fact that I agree at least something needs to be done to address this issue.
1. I don't think making this a felony is a great idea, it just comes off as the state trying to make money off of prisoners (yet again).
2. it's pretty fucked up to require the outing of "a minor's perception that his or her gender is inconsistent with his or her sex". how is this functionally any different then the retards that tell Timmy he's definitely a girl because he played with barbies as a kid?
3. this bill says that it's a felony until the age of 19. the age of sexual consent in Alabama is 16. now obviously these things are not the same (i think procreation is more important for a species than castrating kids) but it seems just a tad fucked up that a 40-something-year-old can shack up with a 16 year old.
5. ultimately this is just a waste of taxpayer dollars and a way for the politicians to get more votes, as I'm almost 100% certain this is going to be overturned at a superior or supreme court.

this article doesn't mention anything about the bill outlining if it just affects youths getting medical care without their parents knowing, or if it affects everyone under the age of 19. I'm going to assume that the article writer won't mention if it only affects minors acting without parent knowledge, but I'll have to read the bill myself to know for sure.

bottom line/ TLDR: politicians once again wasting money trying to solve a complex issue by passing a law that doesn't actually solve or address any of the actual reasons this shit is a problem in the first place.

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

Its darker in Alabama then you think

Only if you’re stupid enough to go to Birmingham.

 

[NyQuilninja]

Only if you’re stupid enough to go to Birmingham.

You're not wrong there Birmingham and the surrounding suburb cities are like little Mogadishu

 

[FEETLOAF]

Another consideration, laws don't tend to get repealed when their usefulness has lapsed once passed, and that perpetually bugs me with this being no exception.

...so? Do you want children to ever have access to self-castrating poison? The law can exist in perpetuity, who cares?
What's the downside here?

 

[Takayuki Yagami]

You're not wrong there Birmingham and the surrounding suburb cities are like little Mogadishu

So many fucking shootings...

 

[NyQuilninja]

So many fucking shootings...

I got a relative that moved there for job reasons. They fucking hate it. I've only visited a couple times but it's not called the dirty south for no reason

 

[HarblMcDavid]

...so? Do you want children to ever have access to self-castrating poison? The law can exist in perpetuity, who cares?
What's the downside here?

Call me an optimist but I can picture a world where we nobody even thinks this kind of shit is remotely acceptable, and I point to the rise and fall of the lobotomy as an analogous situation. It will come at a terrible cost for a generation or two, but eventually, trannymania too will pass.

And when it does, I don't want the law sitting around as a cudgel for some psychopath to use in a few decades when this law truly has outlived its usefulness, if it ever does.

That said, I would not describe the American inability to repeal laws after they no longer contribute to societal good as the primary reason I'm torn about this law, that's the rotten cherry on top; the "ice cream" in this terrible metaphor is that I start the day wanting the government to not pass laws in general, and really don't want the government to pass laws which turn people into felons, again in general, which heavily pre-loads the moral scales for me against this law right out of the gate.

So agree to disagree on this, I don't think we disagree about the treatments, or the people pushing them. The treatments and the people pushing them are why it's a such hard call for me.

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

Who would have thought that Alabama would be the one to try to pull out of Clown World?

 

[Auntie Fester]

Call me an optimist but I can picture a world where we nobody even thinks this kind of shit is remotely acceptable, and I point to the rise and fall of the lobotomy as an analogous situation. It will come at a terrible cost for a generation or two, but eventually, trannymania too will pass.

And when it does, I don't want the law sitting around as a cudgel for some psychopath to use in a few decades when this law truly has outlived its usefulness, if it ever does.

That said, I would not describe the American inability to repeal laws after they no longer contribute to societal good as the primary reason I'm torn about this law, that's the rotten cherry on top; the "ice cream" in this terrible metaphor is that I start the day wanting the government to not pass laws in general, and really don't want the government to pass laws which turn people into felons, again in general, which heavily pre-loads the moral scales for me against this law right out of the gate.

So agree to disagree on this, I don't think we disagree about the treatments, or the people pushing them.

The difference between the fall of the lobotomy and "trannymania" (I like that term, should use it myself) is that the lobotomy was not inherently associated with a particular political philosophy that is being promoted heavily by the economic status quo and mainstream social spaces, both online and offline. I think the best case scenario is out of our reach until we got further documentation of the psychological damage this causes from a non-ideological source.