DarksydePhil / TheyCallMeDSP / Phil Burnell - General Discussion

Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
If I'm not mistaken, I believe his parents live in a townhome.
It's a actual house, over 100 years old, that they apparently own. It has also been converted into a duplex. This is pure speculation, but if Phil's parents own the property and turned their house into a duplex, they are getting rent from the people in the other half of the house, right?

Again, I don't know if this is accurate information.

But if Phil's parents are renting out the other half of the duplex, Dave must have some experience at being a landlord. Phil specifically said he couldn't rent out the Connecticut condo because his dad couldn't handle being a landlord.

I believe the tax records or property records showed that the Burnells own their home. They have lived there approximately from the late 70's or early 80's. Unless they specifically only bought and own one half of the building, which is retarded, I would assume they own the duplex.

Phil mentioned in the parent's house tour that Dave demolished the porch and turned it into another bathroom or something. You don't get to do that type of thing unless you own the property. You can't just tell your landlord that you are going to knock down a few walls and build another room.

So I don't think it's a townhouse. It is an old house they cut in half and rent out. Dave is ten times the businessman that Phil will ever be.
 
The duplex in question. The one on the left is theirs. Dave turned the front porch into a bathroom.
 

Załączniki

  • Screenshot_20201108-164857.jpg
    Screenshot_20201108-164857.jpg
    165,5 KB · Wyświetlenia: 117
The duplex in question. The one on the left is theirs. Dave turned the front porch into a bathroom.
So shitty choices in buying property run in the family huh.

You mean at one point Phils parents thought they wanted to buy a home, a big deal and investment because you're going to spend a lot of money and time living there. And they bought something that resembles a shitty crack den in detroit?
 
A month ago an obvious troll tipped 100$ with the clear intention of doing a charge back, I kept the money and decided to fight it, and now I lost. Otherwise the only 100$ he made since is Battleduck9000 a known a recuurent retarded whale.
So as some speculated, at least since October, Phil was pointing out troll tips, not counting them, insinuating that he was going to refund them... and then contesting them.
But because he was not counting the troll tips, then that wasn't even money that we thought he had, this was hidden money that he didn't get, not counted money that he lost.
To say nothing of the troll tips that he probably challenged and won but said were 'chargebacks' while they were pending. This $100 was probably complained about twice, once when the person charged it back, and again now when he lost it, with both times being framed as money that he lost, despite the fact that it was never part of a tips total to begin with.

To that end, he's right, we don't know what he is making. But the semantic twist there is that between the troll tips that he didn't count on stream and subsequently won, he probably ended up with more money than what could be tallied up based on tips totals. So there was, according to him, one month of actual chargebacks (September) where he didn't know it was happening, and then by October, Phil was trying to game the system and mitigate their negative impact while trying to keep the money.

Once again, this would be the textbook definition of a scam.
 
So as some speculated, at least since October, Phil was pointing out troll tips, not counting them, insinuating that he was going to refund them... and then contesting them.
But because he was not counting the troll tips, then that wasn't even money that we thought he had, this was hidden money that he didn't get, not counted money that he lost.
To say nothing of the troll tips that he probably challenged and won but said were 'chargebacks' while they were pending. This $100 was probably complained about twice, once when the person charged it back, and again now when he lost it, with both times being framed as money that he lost, despite the fact that it was never part of a tips total to begin with.

To that end, he's right, we don't know what he is making. But the semantic twist there is that between the troll tips that he didn't count on stream and subsequently won, he probably ended up with more money than what could be tallied up based on tips totals. So there was, according to him, one month of actual chargebacks (September) where he didn't know it was happening, and then by October, Phil was trying to game the system and mitigate their negative impact while trying to keep the money.

Once again, this would be the textbook definition of a scam.
Have you seen this video? https://youtu.be/OIHgyCyXS9I

It's "The dark side of Twitch's donations".

In it, it's shown a streamer who had thousands of dollars charged back, and he had to pay hundreds of dollars to PayPal for a fee related to chargebacks.

I'm mentioning this because, after I saw that video, I started to believe that absolutely everything in this chargeback saga is a lie. Phil is not getting charged back. He may be refunding troll tips, but I am sure that he's not getting charged back.

And why do I think that? Because, AFAIK, not once has Phil ever complained about the fees that he'd be paying if chargebacks were actually happening. Can you believe that Phil would be spending hundreds of dollars with fees and not complaining about it? No way in hell.

This whole chargeback narrative is a massive scam. Phil shows no proof, and it can be used whenever he needs to up his begging. And retards like Ripley gladly oblige.
 
I'm not sure how that works since I've never bought a duplex. Can you just buy 1/2 of a house?
Yes. I guess people do it as a first home purchase for the credit. I thought it absurd when I first heard someone do it too.

Mr. 100% Real Italian pigsplaining how he makes homemade pizza. Lists some pretty expensive things to put it all together and complains about how hard it is to make dough from scratch. "I can't do thayat, you kidding me?"

Anyone who's really as poor as they claim to be would be perfectly fine with 2 dollar frozen pizzas
If he's actually making pizza at home, he's doing what everyone else does and buys dough from the local pizza joint. He is such a poser that my money is on him having the local joint throwing the pie together then he's just throwing it in his oven.
 
If he's actually making pizza at home, he's doing what everyone else does and buys dough from the local pizza joint. He is such a poser that my money is on him having the local joint throwing the pie together then he's just throwing it in his oven.

I'd highly doubt Phil has made a pizza in the last decade, let alone cooked himself a meal that wasn't pre-cooked and he had to warm it up in the oven. Not forgetting the authentic tomato slurry which he pencils a whole day off to make, if he actually used his kitchen aside from the microwave and the occasional firing up of the oven you'd bet he'd be huffing and puffing about all the hassle he has to go through to prepare, cook, time, stir, drain, etc.

Not to mention he can barely follow simple instructions, the back of a sauce packet is about as complex as he can manage without burning anything.
 
I'm mentioning this because, after I saw that video, I started to believe that absolutely everything in this chargeback saga is a lie. Phil is not getting charged back. He may be refunding troll tips, but I am sure that he's not getting charged back.
I can confirm along with a few others that Phil does not refund. He lets chargebacks sit there forever and does nothing. Maybe he's changed on this recently due to Paypal fees and that's why he admits these chargebacks now, who knows.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole