US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Borscht
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I don't know why someone in the campaign thought it was a good idea to release these images, but...

Wyświetl załącznik 1514162
link / archive
Wyświetl załącznik 1514164Wyświetl załącznik 1514167

Edit: lol scared
Wyświetl załącznik 1514177
link / archive

Wyświetl załącznik 1514178
Looks more cropped than "doctored", but still looks like a deliberate attempt.
They're starting their "Unbiased, not covering up that Biden is a senile script-zombie" coverage early on CNN, I see.
 
The squad have won all their primaries, which makes me wonder that Biden and Kamala are still strong threats to GEOTUS.

The BLM riots and looting and Antifa has not hurt them at all but only gotten them even greater shares of the vote than last time.
 
The squad have won all their primaries, which makes me wonder that Biden and Kamala are still strong threats to GEOTUS.

The BLM riots and looting and Antifa has not hurt them at all but only gotten them even greater shares of the vote than last time.
The Squad are candidates in ethnic districts where their voters hate white people and the politicians are loved because they also hate white people. It's a niche scenario that frightened the Dems so much they're going to gerrymander away AOC's district when NYC is up for redistricting next. As long as they maintain a hostile ethnic enclave they can be in power as long as they like. It's the same for most blacks in congress too.
 
I don't know why someone in the campaign thought it was a good idea to release these images, but...

Wyświetl załącznik 1514162
link / archive
Wyświetl załącznik 1514164Wyświetl załącznik 1514167

Edit: lol scared
Wyświetl załącznik 1514177
link / archive

Wyświetl załącznik 1514178
Looks more cropped than "doctored", but still looks like a deliberate attempt.
I like how he's also holding his phone upside down when calling as well.
 
Shitlibs: #DefundThePolice
Also shitlibs: Vote for the woman who let thousands of innocent black men languish for the sake of cheap labour!

I've been saying this for the last 3 years, but the Democrats are gonna fucking lose miserably this time around and the fallout will be cataclysmic because they still choose to ignore the writing on the walls.
 
script 1.jpeg

What's with the Hagar the Horrible strip framed on his desk

1597222541000.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I pretty much only like Trump's foreign policy of raising two middle fingers to the rest of the world while gyrating his hips.

But lukewarm though I am to Neocon Don, the Democrats have gotten so bad I may actually vote for Trump this November. I've only voted in the 2004 and 2012 elections until now, and both times just for a write-in I thought would be funny.

The "silent majority" is people like me, who have never been enthusiastic about *ANY* political candidate. We will vote out of disgust, however.
 
And there's plenty of shit to hit her on. Gabbard was actually going easy on her. Her record is abysmal. She tried to keep a man who was declared innocent and ordered released in prison for the rest of his life because he missed a filing deadline. It took him 4 more years of fighting to get out. She's power-hungry trash and her record reflects it.
Where's the Rage rating?
 
What is with the Democrats wanting to get women, who everyone hates, as the leader of the free world?
 
That's a good ad.

Another perfect example of Kamala being a bad choice: it highlights Joe's problematic racial past. She put him on blast for it. Yeah you can look at Kamala for being power hungry to suck up to the man after calling him out but it still hurts Joe. All you have to do is play what she said in the debates on repeat and Joe's damaged by his own running mates words.

She has the veneer of being establishment which the far lefties will hate and any one who looks into her purported beliefs will find out she's a commie and most people will hate that. Ignoring the corruption and sleeping your way to the top, that contradiction alone would sink a ticket.

There is no benefit to picking Kamala.
 
There is technically precedent of it being counted a term.

As Theodore Roosevelt only ran for 1 additional term.

That said there isn't any actual supreme court ruling on it.
Youd need to check the (EDIT: 22nd) Amendment, but its possible. LBJ had the opportunity to run in 1968, but chose not to. Roosevelt was president before term limits were created, so he doesnt count
 
None of what you're saying here is "wrong," but this doesn't matter. The people you're talking about are either sure-fire Biden voters, or at best, people who might not vote. The thing is that this will not make those of them who might not vote decide to vote, but much more importantly, these are not the people who are largely affected here. The issue with Presidential elections is the swing states. It's not about twitter liberals, but moderates in swing states. Biden wins by doing two things:

1) getting more support from the base (more of the base comes out to vote)
2) more independents/normies vote Dem rather than Rep

From that perspective, it doesn't seem to make a ton of sense. Biden's not exactly the darling of much of the base, sure, but he's proved significantly more popular than Harris. The same is true with independents/normies. With all that said, I'm still not confident in the Trump campaign strictly due to his negative popularity with a large proportion of the voter base. Still and all, I find it hard to view Harris as anything but a net-negative for Biden. I am and live among midwestern whites, and I definitely get the impression that the prospect of a Harris Presidency is worrying to a large portion of them.
What I was pointing out was there isn't going to be a mass revolt from the base. These people may be less enthusiastic about Kamala but they're still going to make sappy posts on Facebook and tag dozens of people begging them to vote D this November. With the way Kamala was spoken off before yesterday, you'd think a couple of them would stick to their guns, but the Democratic party quite clearly called their bluff.

Its jarring to me because when Trump won the nomination, a small but passionate crowd of NeverTrumpers dug their heels in, and to this day concern troll him over shit that does not matter in any meaningful way. Meanwhile a much larger cohort fell in line and kissed the ring, but the likes of Rubio, Cruz and Huckabee didn't bullshit you into thinking they loved Trump. They respected his mandate, that's it. Whereas these pro-Bernie, pro-Warren, pro-Butt fans? They've spent the guts of a year saying how much they hate Kamala and want nothing to do with her. They've almost unanimously accepted her as the candidate-- however reluctantly-- but this won't be enough in their circles. I'm anticipating thousands of them to gaslight themselves into loving Kamala now (see: Shawn King) and doing ill-conceived headgames to make others love her too. Because they realise passion is the only thing that's gonna oust Trump so willing it into being is the only way forward absent a genuinely compelling candidate
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole