Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
💤 InactiveNick Bate / Nickalaus B. Stoutzenberger (Thread 2: THE RECKONING)
Not a lawyer, but aren't trial materials public? Not in the "uploaded for all to see" kind, but in the kind where you can put in a request to see a copy of the material? I imagine the evaluation would make it into the trial somewhere.
Ordinarily, but case files involving child sexual abuse are routinely "impounded" and not made available to the public. The proceedings themselves might not be public, either. I'm not sure specifically about Pennsylvania's records policies on these, but in the state where I dealt with appeals of cases including such material, any document or other exhibit related to such content was prominently stamped as such and destroyed after the resolution of the proceedings. Victims were only identified in anything public by initials.
It may be that the only details that end up public are the statutes violated and the ultimate sentence.
Remember that the CPS report specifically mentioned that he had "confessed" to the abuse, so I'm presuming that they discovered some of his various discussions of it online. The prosecution will have access to the CPS report.
Remember that the CPS report specifically mentioned that he had "confessed" to the abuse, so I'm presuming that they discovered some of his various discussions of it online. The prosecution will have access to the CPS report.
"Confession" seems to me to indicate something more formal than online admissions that he had done something, though perhaps not something as formal as an actual signed statement. I also recall that the report indicates the abuse took place on an ongoing basis for a period of years, indicating CPS has more information and more detailed information than what Nick has said online.
You might be surprised what perps will admit to in attempts to minimize their offenses, while not realizing that what they said basically amounts to a confession.
"Confession" seems to me to indicate something more formal than online admissions that he had done something, though perhaps not something as formal as an actual signed statement. I also recall that the report indicates the abuse took place on an ongoing basis for a period of years, indicating CPS has more information and more detailed information than what Nick has said online.
You might be surprised what perps will admit to in attempts to minimize their offenses, while not realizing that what they said basically amounts to a confession.
Well, I am presuming CPS has a lower standard for what counts as a "confession" than a court. In fact they probably didn't use the word "confess", I tried to find the actual file for 5 minutes and got bored. But they definitely said that Nick's denial to the CPS officer had to be weighed against the fact that he had discussed the abuse with others, so they definitely had some records along these lines. No, this certainly wouldn't count as a "confession" in the same way an official statement to a police officer would. I just meant that CPS had some evidence involving Nick discussing the abuse, and that this evidence will be available to the prosecution.
It won't be as decisive as a formal legal confession, but it will weigh against any denial he makes that the abuse took place.
The CPS report is in a grainy couple of photos back on page 246 (originally uploaded by Nick) of the last thread. It'd be more informative if there was a better public record of it.
Also, remember when Nick was complaining about having to take care of some dogs and how miserable he was doing it?
Actually, I was thinking about the old thread and maybe thought you guys should make a place to archive all the old/closed versions of lolcow threads. So people will have context later on.
OK, I was just doing some internet archaeology and his old myspace is still up and there is a few interesting pictures. Also the second half of the LARPing video that I haven't watched before (don't bother it's 19 seconds of him farting round with sticks as if they where knifes in his garden).
I was gonna post this earlier, is it normal for prisons to bill the sentenced inmates for their stay or is that a PA thing? If Nick ever gets out of the slammer will the state hand him a bill for however many years he was there?
I've never heard of that, but I do know work details are used. In TN at least, some offenders can be put to work for a reduced sentence, but I've only heard of it done with misdemeanors.