Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

To follow up on the attempted hit piece of Kayleigh McEnany with her Trump stuff, she addressed it today:


Wyświetl załącznik 1279270

That was a solid judo move, here's hoping she calls some of them simps in future press briefings.

Has people started going after her looks yet? Always noticed when it comes to women stepping a toe out of line that libtards like to go after their looks because they mentally and emotionally never graduated past high school to look past the skin to pick through a person's brain.
 
Has people started going after her looks yet? Always noticed when it comes to women stepping a toe out of line that libtards like to go after their looks because they mentally and emotionally never graduated past high school to look past the skin to pick through a person's brain.

How could they make fun of what she looks like and expect to be taken seriously? This bitch is a straight up Stacy.
 
How could they make fun of what she looks like and expect to be taken seriously? This bitch is a straight up Stacy.

Oh that's what they'll do. It's the entire basis of the "Blonde Republican Sex Kitten" trope that they use against real women as much as fictional ones. "Look at her, she is clearly attractive and therefore only useful for sex. How could anyone give any weight to the noises coming from the fuck toy's mouth? By the way, conservatives are very misogynist."
 
Apparently Trump is a genocidal maniac according to this guy:

https://archive.vn/LtdLR
Gregg_1.JPG
When they lose in 2020, the press will accuse him of genociding black voters.
 
Oh that's what they'll do. It's the entire basis of the "Blonde Republican Sex Kitten" trope that they use against real women as much as fictional ones. "Look at her, she is clearly attractive and therefore only useful for sex. How could anyone give any weight to the noises coming from the fuck toy's mouth? By the way, conservatives are very misogynist."

I find this trope pretty hilarious not just for the sexist angle but because they're implying they have a complex issue in that they don't ever have sex due to not being attractive enough for a mate. Potentially this may be true, but most of them are actually married/in a relationship, funnily enough, but apparently they lose that flame later on in life so they take their jealousy and anger out on someone remotely more pretty/younger than themselves to detract from the last time they had intimacy during the honeymoon, some college party, or back at Woodstock.

But then again, it's almost like living a healthy lifestyle and having positive thoughts means having a good sex life to go along with it or something like that. 🤔
 
To follow up on the attempted hit piece of Kayleigh McEnany with her Trump stuff, she addressed it today:


Wyświetl załącznik 1279270

That was a solid judo move, here's hoping she calls some of them simps in future press briefings.
Can't wait for the next hit piece they scramble together because she didn't fall for that one. It brings great satisfaction to know that the "journalists" are so incredibly upset at her calling them out for what they are, made very clear by their immediate rush to somehow discredit her.

There goes Zodiac doing what he does best: ending lives.
Wyświetl załącznik 1279654
I was really enjoying listening to Ted Cruz's podcast during the impeachment trial, haven't seen if they've done any since. It's amazing how much he's changed over the years of Trump being in office from very unlikable (outside of all the memes around him) to his current state. It's also nice to see other republicans "coming out of their shell" as it were towards the public to break away from age old stereotypes.
 
I was really enjoying listening to Ted Cruz's podcast during the impeachment trial, haven't seen if they've done any since. It's amazing how much he's changed over the years of Trump being in office from very unlikable (outside of all the memes around him) to his current state. It's also nice to see other republicans "coming out of their shell" as it were towards the public to break away from age old stereotypes.

My views on him started to shift to positive when he was still campaigning and he had that one outdoor campaign where he was talking and then all of a sudden the big Trump jet flew past his stage and he kind of looked at it and turned around half laughing and half with a "FML" look on his face. I realized this guy wasn't too bad because he could laugh at the absurdity of the whole thing rather than get mad about it. I'm happy to see he's come out of his shell and become a first class shitposter.
 
To follow up on the attempted hit piece of Kayleigh McEnany with her Trump stuff, she addressed it today:


Wyświetl załącznik 1279270

That was a solid judo move, here's hoping she calls some of them simps in future press briefings.

Is Trump teaching night classes in how to do this stuff? Cause I like this new Republican party. 10 years ago they would have had some simpering fuck apologizing for not losing the election faster.

"No, and Fuck You" should be the new GOP motto.

"We want Communism!"

"No, and Fuck You."

"Admit you're a racist!"

"No, and Fuck You."

"King Obama, Lord of the Dindus was the better president!"

"No, and Fuck You."
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Has people started going after her looks yet? Always noticed when it comes to women stepping a toe out of line that libtards like to go after their looks because they mentally and emotionally never graduated past high school to look past the skin to pick through a person's brain.
Yeah, on Twitter people call her a blow up doll and insinuate shes only there for her looks or whatever. Standard sexist hypocrisy stuff.
 
I think a lot of them are realizing that there really is no compromising or negotiating with the left; they will always demand further compromise and concession and the only alternative is total war.

The left thinks they are moral paragons, who are the only ones who have the answers to everything. From that deluded narcissism, compromise doesn't exist -- it's only capitulating to other, evil and inferior, beliefs.

This has always been a problem but social media intentionally causing epistemic closure via algorithms has amplified the issue immensely. Google even gives you news (and other search) results it thinks you'll agree with, and hides those it thinks you'll be upset at.

This is only going to get a whole lot worse before it gets better.
 
Is Trump teaching night classes in how to do this stuff? Cause I like this new Republican party. 10 years ago they would have had some simpering fuck apologizing for not losing the election faster.

"No, and Fuck You" should be the new GOP motto.

"We want Communism!"

"No, and Fuck You."

"Admit you're a racist!"

"No, and Fuck You."

"King Obama, Lord of the Dindus was the better president!"

"No, and Fuck You."

I think at this point people are tired of the "media packaged" candidate. The ones that clearly have multiple marketing companies doing several focus groups a week all to "distill" the perfect message for that region.

Problem is we can get people's voting records in the palm of our hands, which sucks when some people have been in politics for decades and we can see that they are blatently pandering to some fringe group.

People want to know our politicians are actually human. Not this shrink wrapped, designed by committee mannequin that you see once every couple of years. Social media (for better or worse) has let the mask slip from politicians and, somehow, Republicans are adapting better than Democrats.
 
Social media (for better or worse) has let the mask slip from politicians and, somehow, Republicans are adapting better than Democrats.
Because Republicans have been under the gun and scrutiny for far longer. When you've gotten use to a hostile media that is going to take everything you do in the worst possible light, social media is going to be a breeze.

The democrats meanwhile have gotten soft, being used to the media covering up their gaffes and mistakes unless something gets too big to ignore. So of course they're underprepared for the social media world.
 
Obama realizing that his legacy is about to go down in flames. Bold is mine.


A tape of the former president's private warning Friday to members of the Obama Alumni Association was obtained and reported by Yahoo News after newly released documents raised questions about the extent to which Obama was privy to the actions taken by the FBI in its investigation of Flynn.

“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said.

“And the fact that there is there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic — not just institutional norms — but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places," he added, misstating that Flynn was charged with perjury. Flynn was charged with false statements to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian envoy.

Obama highlighted the Flynn case as an urgent reason for former Obama administration officials to support Joe Biden, Obama's vice president who is now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee to take on President Trump in this year's election. An "anemic and spotty" response to the coronavirus pandemic also served as a catalyst for Obama to fully commit to backing Biden.

"It has been an absolute chaotic disaster when that mindset — of ‘what’s in it for me’ and ‘to heck with everybody else’—when that mindset is operationalized in our government," Obama said. “So that’s why, I, by the way, am going to be spending as much time as necessary and campaigning as hard as I can for Joe Biden."
That's a 180 from when Barry couldn't even be arsed to endorse him during the primaries.
 
“And the fact that there is there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free."
Oh, professor? There's ample precedent. People get charged with things and not convicted all the time. I realize you wanted another outcome in this case, but let's not distort the law.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole