- Dołączono
- 17 Sie 2018
At least we know America's stance on women based on these two allegations alone.
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
At least we know America's stance on women based on these two allegations alone.
The MSM - not even once, people. Meth is better for you.
| Meth | MSM | |
| Causes Irrational Behavior? | Yes | Yes |
| Increases Anxiety and Aggression? | Yes | Yes |
| Causes Paranoia? | Yes | Yes |
| Causes Premature Aging? | Yes | Yes |
| Drives people away from you? | Yes | Yes |
| Supports the local economy? | Yes | No |
| Makes you feel good for a while? | Yes | No |
Yep, Don Lemon dick licks for Obama to bash Trump.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=C8imLPAU47g
This is something I'd got quite curious about myself. So far as I know, there is a handful which meet your loose criteria, but I decided to check. Though I'd add one critiera of my own: "Has literally any backing evidence whatsoever". With this, we have four possible results; That they pass the critieria and can be considered at the very least to be 'credible' in that there is some reason to believe they might be true (The kavanaugh standard), they fail in that they fail to present a reason beyond the accusation itself, they recant which means they have publically said something which gives reason to dismiss it, or they are a god damn liar and have been proven to be so or that the viewer has damn good reason to draw that conclusion.The "What about Trump???" Biden-defenders throw around all kinds of wild numbers of "Trump accusers": 22, 27, 30...
The only way to get to those numbers, is to include accusations of unwanted hugs/kisses/looks (rather than sexual assault).
Of which Biden has his fair share, too - and unlike Trump, Biden is on camera doing that kind of thing over and over again.
So the "But what about Trump? Biden has 1 accusation and Trump 30!" argument is not just exceptional Whataboutism, but also a lie.
I've also noticed that the lists of "Trump accusers" that are furiously shared on Twitter tend to include former accusers that have long since recanted.
And of course they include the alleged girl that was "enslaved by Epstein and raped by Trump when she was 13", where we don't know if the accuser even exists, because all we have is a civil lawsuit by some shady Dem lawyer "on her behalf", that had to be thrown out by the judge because it listed a fake address in the paperwork and then was never refiled properly.
If someone has a list of the actual outstanding sexual assault accusations against Trump (meaning: where an accuser has actually personally come forward, and it been has neither been recanted/withdrawn or proven false), please share. Just because we make fun of TDS, doesn't mean we should ignore Trump's shit.
Are there even any such accusations?
(Other than E. Jean Carroll, whose accusation I suppose hasn't been literally proven false, it's just that not even the Dems take her seriously after her kooky CNN interview.)
When are we going to stop funding people who fucking hate us?
At its very weakest, even if nothing truly comes from this, it still neutralizes one of the lefts favorite tactics. They now can not use 'Trump is a rapist' or any kind of 'Trumps attitude to women' style attacks without it immediately boomeranging on them.
When the best way they can spin it is "well our guy has only been accused of raping one woman" it completely kills one of their primary avenues of attack against Trump, at least on a campaign/attack ad level. Hypocritical scum on twitter will still try, but that will likely only drive even more people away from the democrats.
Likely not in our lifetime. The people doing this hate us as much as the people they’re funding. It makes me wonder if McCarthy was right back during his time. We live in strange times.When are we going to stop funding people who fucking hate us?
At least we know America's stance on women based on these two allegations alone.
Likely not in our lifetime. The people doing this hate us as much as the people they’re funding. It makes me wonder if McCarthy was right back during his time. We live in strange times.
McCarthy targeted the Army and the State Department, Roy Brewer was the one who investigated Communist Infiltration in HollywoodListen if you had feminist screeching that flirting with a girl is rape you're sympathy for the gender would dry up pretty quickly. That being said for the longest time the game has been rules for thee and not for me this is just the first time we get them to admit to it.
Considering he was targeting a hollywood union that had major ties to the USSR we have to come to the conclussion that MCARTHY DID NOTHING WORNG.
This is written by a Democrat whose party has nominated a white guy.
Wyświetl załącznik 1271157
That was basically Joseph McCarthy's 'Achilles heel'.McCarthy targeted the Army and the State Department, Roy Brewer was the one who investigated Communist Infiltration in Hollywood
Why does "minority" always waver back and forth between meaning racial minority and sexual/racial/religious minority? I suppose it is for the convenience of people using the terms to get what they want, but it seems strange to me that sexual and religious minorities only count sometimes. Oh well, intersectional politics aren't ever consistent anyways.This is written by a Democrat whose party has nominated a white guy.
Wyświetl załącznik 1271157
According to somebody I once convo'd with, this apparently isn't true:
"Actually, the decade they [Trump's casinos] were active was a thriving time for gambling, according to NYT. The reason why they went under while others did not was mostly due to several incredibly high interest loans.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/12/nyregion/donald-trump-atlantic-city.html"
He did do something wrongConsidering he was targeting a hollywood union that had major ties to the USSR we have to come to the conclussion that MCARTHY DID NOTHING WRONG.
It’ll be more like Independents realize the Democratic Party is unironically a cult and either vote for Trump or stay home come election day. What sort of good optics is shitting on a sexual assault victim that has evidence and also saying “Joe Biden may be a rapist, but at least he isn’t ORANGE MAN”. That’s political suicide in the long run and election losing autism in the short term.If democrat voters start to leave en masse out of disgust and Biden loses by a landslide, these faggots have absolutely nobody to blame but themselves.
Somebody sounds jelly they've been oppressed for a couple centuries and done fuckall about it, but then some other group stops putting up with it in a fraction of the time.This is written by a Democrat whose party has nominated a white guy.
Wyświetl załącznik 1271157
I used a bad analogy then. I believed he targeted Hollywood. Targeting the military is stupid. You’re not likely to find “American Commies” there unless they’re actual spies. The current crop of woke communists hoping for America’s downfall hate the Armed Forces and want it destroyed. Hollywood is teeming with them and I have little problem believing the State Department has it’s share of them.McCarthy targeted the Army and the State Department, Roy Brewer was the one who investigated Communist Infiltration in Hollywood